Scottish Ale yeast confusion - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > Scottish Ale yeast confusion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-17-2013, 03:22 PM   #1
bferullo
Recipes 
 
Feb 2009
Bel Air, MD
Posts: 519
Liked 23 Times on 20 Posts



Ok, so after reading up most people use scottish yeast. I have seen Jamil's recipe's using WLP001 and fermenting a little higher than scottish yeasts.

I don't have a fermentation chamber, so I am subject to basement temps. this time of year I can get fermentation around 65 degrees +/- a degree or so. So it would seem logical for me to go the Jamil route.

I am not necessarily looking to have the "slight smoke" flavor that seems to be attached to Wyeast 1728 and cioncerned about keeping the temp low enough for this yeast.

Any advice/thoughts appreciated.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 05:59 PM   #2
AnchorBock
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Minneapolis
Posts: 568
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by bferullo View Post
Ok, so after reading up most people use scottish yeast. I have seen Jamil's recipe's using WLP001 and fermenting a little higher than scottish yeasts.

I don't have a fermentation chamber, so I am subject to basement temps. this time of year I can get fermentation around 65 degrees +/- a degree or so. So it would seem logical for me to go the Jamil route.

I am not necessarily looking to have the "slight smoke" flavor that seems to be attached to Wyeast 1728 and cioncerned about keeping the temp low enough for this yeast.

Any advice/thoughts appreciated.
If you can chill the wort to like 61 or 62 and then pitch. Fermentation will take it up to 65 or so as it ramps up, but you should be ok with 001 even a little above 65 as long as you pitch lower.


__________________
Homebrewing blog: http://bagendbrewery.wordpress.com

Beer Engine Caskegerator - Hand pump/keg enclosure for Real Ale at home.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:05 PM   #3
weirdboy
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Los Angeles
Posts: 8,162
Liked 481 Times on 389 Posts


Nottingham or WLP001/US-05 works fine IMO. I don't like fermenting so high as AnchorBock is saying, even with a cleaner yeast. These beers are traditionally fermented quite low, like in the 50's. I have heard of some people fermenting in the high 40's even. You shouldn't have esters in this beer, IMO, although "low fruitiness" is OK in the lighter Scottish Ales, and "low to moderate" is OK in a wee heavy. I dunno I just think the cleaner fermentation tastes better, personally.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:08 PM   #4
cooper
Recipes 
 
Dec 2009
OFallon, IL
Posts: 467
Liked 28 Times on 25 Posts


What recipe are you looking at? I've been wanting to do a Scottish Ale so I figured I'd ask. I do agree though to keep the fermenting temps down to 60ish for Scottish Ales

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:18 PM   #5
AnchorBock
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Minneapolis
Posts: 568
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by weirdboy View Post
Nottingham or WLP001/US-05 works fine IMO. I don't like fermenting so high as AnchorBock is saying, even with a cleaner yeast. These beers are traditionally fermented quite low, like in the 50's. I have heard of some people fermenting in the high 40's even. You shouldn't have esters in this beer, IMO, although "low fruitiness" is OK in the lighter Scottish Ales, and "low to moderate" is OK in a wee heavy. I dunno I just think the cleaner fermentation tastes better, personally.
The OP was asking if it would be ok to ferment at 65* give or take, without the ability to ferment lower. Obviously the lower end of the strain he can ferment at the better, but in this case I think 65*ish would do just fine especially if pitched in 61-62* wort. I've brewed Jamil's scottish ales at 65* with WLP001 and they turn out fantastic.
__________________
Homebrewing blog: http://bagendbrewery.wordpress.com

Beer Engine Caskegerator - Hand pump/keg enclosure for Real Ale at home.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:22 PM   #6
weirdboy
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Los Angeles
Posts: 8,162
Liked 481 Times on 389 Posts


I agree that if you cannot control the temperature, going with the cleanest yeast you can find is best.

That being said, not having a fermentation chamber is no excuse for not being able to ferment colder. For the $20 purchase of a cooler you can control temps down to 40's and 50's if you fill it with water and stick the fermenter in there with some ice bottles.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:25 PM   #7
stpug
Recipes 
 
Nov 2012
Posts: 3,600
Liked 665 Times on 559 Posts


Quite honestly, I've found 1728 to be a pretty forgiving strain. I once had a high gravity ale (lightweight barleywine) get away from me badly and get into the low 80s before I quickly brought the temp down into the mid-60s, and the beer turned out splendid. I DID give it plenty of time on the cake (~4 weeks) though. This was a highly hopped beer with a few ounces of dry hops as well, so perhaps this helps mask any off flavors. I did not noticed any smoke attributes to this beer at all.

I then washed a reused a portion of this yeast (which was my first time without much thought as to gravities and alcohol) in an 80 shilling ale, however this time I made sure to keep the temp between 60-65F. This beer also turned out great considering is was a partial mash (very mild extract twang). I've really liked how this one turned out and have been wanting to redo this using all grain and with the same yeast. Again, I did not notice any smokiness.

IMO, I really like this yeast and find it pretty easy to work with. In fact, I'm planning a robust porter with this yeast in the next few days

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 08:40 PM   #8
bferullo
Recipes 
 
Feb 2009
Bel Air, MD
Posts: 519
Liked 23 Times on 20 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by cooper View Post
What recipe are you looking at? I've been wanting to do a Scottish Ale so I figured I'd ask. I do agree though to keep the fermenting temps down to 60ish for Scottish Ales
A recipe I have been toying around with. Not that complex...will do a 90 minute boil and the 1st runnings caramelization....batch size is 6 gallons with 72% eff.

6.5 lbs MO
4 lbs pale 2-row
1 lb 5 oz carapils
11 oz crisp caramel 45
4 oz roasted barley

2 oz EKG @ 45 minutes (AA% about 6.5)

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:34 PM   #9
weirdboy
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Los Angeles
Posts: 8,162
Liked 481 Times on 389 Posts


That's an awful lot of hops for a Scottish ale, and the grain bill puts the OG into a sort of weird place...probably higher gravity than an 80 shilling, but not really big enough to be a wee heavy. Maybe it's a 10 gallon recipe?

I still think even at 10 gallons and saying it's a 60/- that it's going to be too bitter.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 12:57 PM   #10
bferullo
Recipes 
 
Feb 2009
Bel Air, MD
Posts: 519
Liked 23 Times on 20 Posts


OOPS.....actually i had 1.6 oz in the recipe. it came out with a OG:BU ratio of around 0.5. Daniels suggests 0.4-0.6ish. The IBU came out to be just under 30.

According to Beersmith I am slightly out of range on ABV and OG, but I figured based on my varying efficiency I will end up with an OG closer to 1.052-1.055 and thus the ABV will then fall into range. With my latest setup I have been overestimating to compensate for lower efficiency levels.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
yeast calc confusion frostyp Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 11-04-2012 01:18 AM
Yeast terminology confusion je52rm Fermentation & Yeast 12 01-10-2012 03:41 PM
yeast starter confusion BrewAlchemy General Techniques 9 01-12-2011 02:29 PM
Yeast Starter Confusion HELP!! eon Fermentation & Yeast 15 09-25-2010 05:59 AM
3rd batch-need some help w/yeast confusion.... Beernewb Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 10-18-2008 07:40 PM


Forum Jump