Decoction vs direct fire step mash - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Decoction vs direct fire step mash

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2013, 06:37 PM   #1
Islandboy85
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Dallas, Texas
Posts: 777
Liked 15 Times on 13 Posts



Would I be getting close to the same results, probably not quite as dark of a final product, doing direct fire step instead of decoction?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013, 10:16 PM   #2
JonK331
 
JonK331's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,100
Liked 32 Times on 32 Posts


Not really because decoction involves actually boiling part of the mash. You can use some melanoidin malt or a malt with high melanoidin content such as Munich to mimic the effects of a decoction.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:16 AM   #3
Islandboy85
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Dallas, Texas
Posts: 777
Liked 15 Times on 13 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by JonK331
Not really because decoction involves actually boiling part of the mash. You can use some melanoidin malt or a malt with high melanoidin content such as Munich to mimic the effects of a decoction.
I'll have to try that. I'd prefer that over what seems like a lot of work with a decoction.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 06:55 PM   #4
Denny
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jun 2005
Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,703
Liked 624 Times on 447 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by JonK331 View Post
Not really because decoction involves actually boiling part of the mash. You can use some melanoidin malt or a malt with high melanoidin content such as Munich to mimic the effects of a decoction.
First, you have to assume that decoction has effects those malts will mimic. I have not found that to be the case. Read this, starting on pg. 25...http://www.ahaconference.org/wp-cont.../DennyConn.pdf

Then, you should read this.....

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/deco...n-malt-345844/
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - "Homebrew All Stars" now shipping!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 07:43 PM   #5
Islandboy85
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Dallas, Texas
Posts: 777
Liked 15 Times on 13 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Denny

First, you have to assume that decoction has effects those malts will mimic. I have not found that to be the case. Read this, starting on pg. 25...http://www.ahaconference.org/wp-cont.../DennyConn.pdf

Then, you should read this.....

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/deco...n-malt-345844/
That was some interesting reading. Definitely see an obvious difference in opinions about this subject. I'll have to YouTube decoction more to see if I want to go to the trouble.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 07:58 PM   #6
Denny
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jun 2005
Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,703
Liked 624 Times on 447 Posts


While I think that anyone who's interested in decoctions should try at least one, I also don't think you should expect to see or taste major differences in the beer. It seems like most (not ALL) of the people who think decoction makes a difference haven't done side by side testing with a blind triangle test.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - "Homebrew All Stars" now shipping!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:47 PM   #7
JonK331
 
JonK331's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Fremont, CA
Posts: 2,100
Liked 32 Times on 32 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Denny View Post
First, you have to assume that decoction has effects those malts will mimic. I have not found that to be the case. Read this, starting on pg. 25...http://www.ahaconference.org/wp-cont.../DennyConn.pdf

Then, you should read this.....

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/deco...n-malt-345844/
Nice reads. We do know that decoction creates melanoidins that are not there if we don't decoct. That's where the logic comes from with using malts that have higher melanoidin content. So while adding those types of malts may not be exactly the same as decocting, it is closer than not using them at all.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 11:05 PM   #8
Denny
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jun 2005
Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,703
Liked 624 Times on 447 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by JonK331 View Post
Nice reads. We do know that decoction creates melanoidins that are not there if we don't decoct. That's where the logic comes from with using malts that have higher melanoidin content. So while adding those types of malts may not be exactly the same as decocting, it is closer than not using them at all.
Keep in mind that melanoidins are colors, not flavors. Melanoidin malt is misnamed, I feel. It has a distinct flavor as well as the color.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - "Homebrew All Stars" now shipping!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 11:58 PM   #9
VladOfTrub
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
, Pa
Posts: 717
Liked 169 Times on 114 Posts


The pdf picture of the brewing equipment: Do you use that system for decoction mashing? If you don't, can you put in a picture of your decoction equipment?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 12:09 AM   #10
VladOfTrub
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
, Pa
Posts: 717
Liked 169 Times on 114 Posts


WAHA Projects - Clinics
Written by Mark Emiley
Wednesday, 22 July 2009 19:09
A few notes and results from the decoction clinic experiment.

In January, 2009, The Washington Homebrewer's Association sponsored a decoction mashing clinic. Some 35 people showed up to learn about the process and why it is used. Three different doppelbocks were brewed using the same yeast slurry generously provided by Baron Brewing of Seattle, (Wyeast 2308), the same hops, German Hallertauer, the same fermenting temperature 48 degrees, (and the same basic malt bill. One used a single infusion mash at 150 degrees. The second used a single infusion mash at 150 degrees but also had replaced about 4% of the base malt with melanoidin malt. Finally, the third used a triple decoction mash schedule at 95, 122 and 140. Each pull was heated to 158 degrees and allowed to rest for 20 minutes, boiled for 10 minutes, and then blended back into the mash tun and allowed to rest for 20 minutes before making the next pull.

The purpose of the clinic and brewing the different beers was to get an idea whether decoction mashing makes any appreciable difference in the outcome of the beer versus an infusion mash. For comparison, melanoidin malt was added to one of the infusion mash beers to see if that resulted in an increase in that character element.

Recipe (10 Gallons) Single Infusion & Triple Decoction

Malt Bill
Vienna Malt 12 lb
Lt Munich Malt 12 lb
Dk Munich Malt 2 lb

Hop Bill
2.75 oz Hallertauer 4.1% AA 60 min
1.00 oz Hallertauer 4.1% AA 30 min

Yeast
Wyeast 2308 Munich Lager Primary Temp 48 Degrees, Diacetyl rest at 62 degrees for 3 days min.

At the National Homebrewers Conference, participants were given the three beers without knowing which was which. They were then asked the following two questions:

1. Which beer was the triple decoction mash?

2. Which beer do you like best?

The results for the first question were:

Single Infusion Mash: 13.89%
Single Infusion Mash with 4% Melanoidin Malt: 40.28%
Triple Decocted Mash: 45.83%

The results for the second question were:

1. Triple Decocted Mash
2. Single Infusion Mash with 4% Melanoidin Malt
3. Single Infusion Mash

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RIMS Step mashing- no direct fire rp5brew All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 1 01-17-2013 01:59 PM
Heated-Direct Fire Mash Tun -- How to? Bmcclure8 Equipment/Sanitation 23 10-14-2012 09:31 PM
Direct fire RIMS vs direct fire, auto-stir mash? Hex Equipment/Sanitation 16 12-21-2010 02:34 PM
Direct fire mash tun? BrewSapiens Equipment/Sanitation 8 04-27-2008 04:21 PM
Direct Heat Multi-step vs. Decoction menschmaschine All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 5 08-01-2007 07:39 PM


Forum Jump