Is "borrowing" wireless wrong? - Page 18 - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Community > General Chit Chat > Is "borrowing" wireless wrong?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-04-2013, 06:30 PM   #171
Airborneguy
Adjunct of the Law
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Airborneguy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2009
Isle of Staten
Posts: 10,886
Liked 855 Times on 626 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99 View Post
If the owness is on me to implement security to protect myself from your piggybacking, if I'm concerned about it, does it not follow that the owness is on you to seek refuge in a Faraday cage to protect yourself from my EMI/RFI, if you are concerned about that?
I don't have any opinion on hiding from rampant wi-fi at all. My point was that you see question as obviously and clearly a black and white issue as if those of us who question the matter further are immoral society destroyers.
__________________
Fermentor(s):
Lagering:
Bottled: Atonement Brown Porter

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 06:32 PM   #172
Airborneguy
Adjunct of the Law
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Airborneguy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2009
Isle of Staten
Posts: 10,886
Liked 855 Times on 626 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by CreamyGoodness View Post
Should I even bring up the fact that on my old laptop my device would roam and reconnect to the network with the most bars and least restrictions. Sometimes it would hop off my password protected network to jump on some local linksys network and then jump back. That wasnt my choice, it was the way the device was set up to work.
I mentioned that already. It was ignored I believe.
__________________
Fermentor(s):
Lagering:
Bottled: Atonement Brown Porter

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 08:14 PM   #173
maxamuus
 
maxamuus's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Utah
Posts: 868
Liked 66 Times on 54 Posts


You all will be happy to know Comcrap has restored my Internet. Only took them 2 days to do it. So now i am "legal" again.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 08:46 PM   #174
Jukas
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 974
Liked 104 Times on 79 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99
If the owness is on me to implement security to protect myself from your piggybacking, if I'm concerned about it, does it not follow that the owness is on you to seek refuge in a Faraday cage to protect yourself from my EMI/RFI, if you are concerned about that?
Oh good lord..

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 10:48 PM   #175
zeg
Recipes 
 
Jan 2012
West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,216
Liked 129 Times on 111 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Airborneguy View Post
I mentioned that already. It was ignored I believe.
I think I commented on it, at least in a draft of something at some point.

Accidental/incidental connection to a wireless network is a very different scenario. That is probably true legally, and certainly true ethically.

In fact, I'd go so far as to say that in that case, it is an open and shut ethical question. It's not "wrong" any more than any other accidental act is "wrong." To me, that means it's not wrong at all, but you are responsible for any injuries that result from it.

As a practical matter, that sort of automatic connecting behavior is a terrible configuration, for numerous reasons, but it's not exactly unethical if you're not doing it intentionally.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2013, 02:14 AM   #176
whoaru99
Recipes 
 
Oct 2012
Posts: 1,760
Liked 140 Times on 117 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukas View Post
Oh good lord..

Really? I think it's a better rebuttal than Airborneguy was expecting.
__________________
Drinking: Store Bought
Kegged: Cream Ale

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2013, 02:16 AM   #177
whoaru99
Recipes 
 
Oct 2012
Posts: 1,760
Liked 140 Times on 117 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by zeg View Post

As a practical matter, that sort of automatic connecting behavior is a terrible configuration, for numerous reasons, but it's not exactly unethical if you're not doing it intentionally.
When does it stop becoming unintentional if you know it's happening and can prevent it from happening? If one expects people to be smart enough to secure their wireless I think it's reasonable to expect they're smart enough to turn off the automatic connection function.
__________________
Drinking: Store Bought
Kegged: Cream Ale

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2013, 02:29 AM   #178
Jukas
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 974
Liked 104 Times on 79 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99 View Post
Really? I think it's a better rebuttal than Airborneguy was expecting.
It wasn't. One is an active decision (or lack of) on your part in terms of securing your network. The other is a passive action that is subjected upon someone else, possibly without their awareness.

Of course you could always provide the rebuttal that if they were concerned about the radiation/rf signal saturation it it's responsibility to do the due diligence to see what they're being subjected to. That would beg the natural rebuttal that if you were concerned about people using your wireless it's your responsibility to do the due diligence to make sure your network has at least minimal security preventing random and unauthorized use.

Your basal argument is flawed, it would be like me playing HBO on a street facing tv in my garage and then expecting passerby's to make the moral decision not to look at it because it's my cable subscription, not theirs.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2013, 02:38 AM   #179
whoaru99
Recipes 
 
Oct 2012
Posts: 1,760
Liked 140 Times on 117 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukas View Post
Of course you could always provide the rebuttal that if they were concerned about the radiation/rf signal saturation it it's responsibility to do the due diligence to see what they're being subjected to. That would beg the natural rebuttal that if you were concerned about people using your wireless it's your responsibility to do the due diligence to make sure your network has at least minimal security preventing random and unauthorized use.
Which is exactly what I said.

As far as my base argument, that is unchanged; don't take what isn't yours. Simple.
__________________
Drinking: Store Bought
Kegged: Cream Ale

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2013, 02:42 AM   #180
CreamyGoodness
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
CreamyGoodness's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Ossining, NY
Posts: 7,491
Liked 2134 Times on 1409 Posts


Before I continue, let me ask... is this an actual debate (discussion of opinions and facts to support a thesis) or has it become an invitation for an argument? Because frankly, I dont give a flying arse-buggery against a rolling doughnut about the actual "crime"...
__________________
See, that's where the real story is.
In the competition for the attention of the space aliens.
Everyone's equal in the eyes of God, but the space aliens, you've got to figure they would play favorites.




YES, WE HAVE TRIED OTHER YEASTS! USE BREAD YEAST FOR JAOM!


 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BIAB "Experiment" Gone Wrong JohnnySardonic Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 15 07-05-2012 05:37 PM
Another "I think I ruined my first batch" thread. What went wrong? MTB Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 19 03-03-2011 08:19 PM
Another "something is wrong with my hops" question PSmurf78 Hops Growing 2 07-24-2009 07:05 PM
Northern Brewer's Cream ale "Something had to go wrong". BillTheSlink Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 13 05-07-2009 09:27 PM
Why is "Commercial" spelled wrong? McCall St. Brewer Commercial Brew Discussion 3 03-23-2007 10:43 PM


Forum Jump