First AG BIAB - Would Appreciate some Feedback - Thanks - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > BIAB Brewing > First AG BIAB - Would Appreciate some Feedback - Thanks

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2012, 08:34 PM   #1
Jps101
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 90
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts



So yesterday, I am did my first AG, BIAB. Earlier in the week, I sewed up a voile cloth bag. material direct from Joanne Fabrics, even used a "serger". Who knew I could be domesticated. Nonetheless, I used a receipe that was in BYO mag, earlier this year for an Imperial Blonde Ale - 14.625# of grain. everything seemed to go pretty easy, for the most part...I think. Used 8 gallons of water for a 2.18 qt/# ratio. Raised water temp to 160*, mashed in and water hovered around 152*. had to reheat briefly at about 30 min. Tried to stip mach every 15 min to make sure i was getting good water exposure. I also double crushed my grain bill as I have read that helps with efficiency. Raised the the temp for mash out to what I thought was 170*, but it quickly dropped to 166*, left there for 10 min. Removed the grains and put in a 6.5 gallon bucket to squeeze out as much wort as possible. I ended up getting nearly 3/4 of a gallon. Added this back to the kettle for a total volume of ~6.75 gallons. Pre boil gravity was 1.057 (target 1.059). Boiled for an hour, added 2.5# of clover honey (per recipe) last 5 min. Final gravity was 1.081. Here is where I have some questions...per Beersmith, I had 90% efficiency. This does not seem realistic. I ended up with about 6 gallons in to the fermenter, plus I added about 2.5L from my starters. This is a big beer, so I made a 2.5L starter.
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0075 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	175
Size:	37.0 KB
ID:	90596   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0076 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	175
Size:	33.4 KB
ID:	90597   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0079 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	175
Size:	33.8 KB
ID:	90598   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0081 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	171
Size:	34.8 KB
ID:	90599   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0083 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	169
Size:	38.8 KB
ID:	90600  


 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 08:36 PM   #2
Jps101
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 90
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts


More Pics...
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0085 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	170
Size:	41.4 KB
ID:	90602   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0086 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	164
Size:	29.2 KB
ID:	90603   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0089 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	162
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	90604   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0094 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	164
Size:	41.7 KB
ID:	90605   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0095 (1024x680).jpg
Views:	162
Size:	18.7 KB
ID:	90606  


 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:53 PM   #3
GotPushrods
 
GotPushrods's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2012
Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Liked 147 Times on 99 Posts


You got about 74% efficiency from the mash and bag-squeeze.

57 points (1.057) * 6.75 gallons collected = 384.75 points collected pre-boil.

36 points / lb (average malt potential) * 14.625 lbs = 526.5 points possible

384.75 / 526.5 ~ 74%

I don't BIAB but that looks about right. You generally use pre-boil to judge your efficiency, not sure which number you're looking at in BS

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:56 PM   #4
Jps101
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 90
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by GotPushrods View Post
You got about 74% efficiency from the mash and bag-squeeze.

57 points (1.057) * 6.75 gallons collected = 384.75 points collected pre-boil.

36 points / lb (average malt potential) * 14.625 lbs = 526.5 points possible

384.75 / 526.5 ~ 74%

I don't BIAB but that looks about right. You generally use pre-boil to judge your efficiency, not sure which number you're looking at in BS
Thanks! Thanks feels more realistic. Funny thing, I just went back into BS to see where I got the numbers and when I opened, it now shows 75%, right in line with your numbers.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 10:08 PM   #5
GotPushrods
 
GotPushrods's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2012
Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Liked 147 Times on 99 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jps101

Thanks! Thanks feels more realistic. Funny thing, I just went back into BS to see where I got the numbers and when I opened, it now shows 75%, right in line with your numbers.
In reality, BS probably did not use 36 points/lb for every malt. Some were likely a bit lower, thus a slightly lower potential and slightly higher efficiency. If you double click on each grain in the recipe you will see a field for potential extract. This should help you understand the numbers.

Sounds spot on to me!

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BIAB Barleywine feedback kmos Recipes/Ingredients 2 11-27-2012 05:48 PM
Sparge BIAB vs. Regular BIAB Efficiency traviswalken All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 20 10-06-2012 12:56 AM
BIAB Irish Red Recipie Feedback Appriciated Tarrant Recipes/Ingredients 0 06-26-2012 12:38 PM
A nice Podcast on BIAB from one of the Pioneers of BIAB gunner65 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 0 02-26-2011 01:24 AM
First AG - BIAB - 10 gal oatmeal stout - Feedback please Richardwhittaker All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 19 01-13-2010 03:55 PM


Forum Jump