Considering Safale US-05 - Page 3 - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Considering Safale US-05

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-12-2012, 01:40 PM   #21
ludomonster
Recipes 
 
Feb 2012
berlin, nj
Posts: 507
Liked 33 Times on 29 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by VTrookie View Post
What was the issue?

Just curious as in the future I may do an IIPA that would call for a large addition of sugar and may ferment around 72-75F
I got lots of acetaldehyde. This was a cream ale. For US-05, you should ferment in the mid-60s. If you have to ferment that warm, consider using a different adjunct, such as rice syrup solids or honey.
__________________
Bottled: Old Freckled Men, Berlin Mart Cider, Creamer Ale II
English Mother****er, Do You Drink It Pale Ale
C4 Pale Ale (Centennial, Challenger, Cascade, Citra hopburst)

Gone: Honeybadger Wheat Ale, Bad Amba Jamma, Badder Amba Jamma, Slam Dunkelweizen, Creamer Ale I, Robust Porter

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 02:41 PM   #22
Matterpro
 
Matterpro's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2012
Austin, TX
Posts: 48
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by ludomonster View Post
I got lots of acetaldehyde. This was a cream ale. For US-05, you should ferment in the mid-60s. If you have to ferment that warm, consider using a different adjunct, such as rice syrup solids or honey.
Crazy, I've never dumped sugar on S-05 before... guess it gets a little hot for it, huh.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 05:47 PM   #23
ubenumber2
Recipes 
 
Oct 2012
Paragould, Arkansas
Posts: 43
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


I just bottled up a pale ale using S-05 , started at 1.055 and ended up at 1.006 , I taste hops and malt , no real yeast flavor to the beer , I brewed up an IPA using this yesterday so I hope it tuns out as well as my pale ale
__________________
[B]Primary CTZ/Citra IPA
Primary 2 ?????

Bottle ARPA Pale Ale
Bottle Busta Newt Barleywine

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 06:02 PM   #24
kh54s10
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
kh54s10's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2011
Tiverton, Rhode Island
Posts: 10,872
Liked 1659 Times on 1358 Posts


IMO WLP001, Wy1056 and USO5 are similarenough that the only way most, not all, people would notice much difference would be if you split a batch and fermented at the same temperatures then tasted them side by side.

I have come to keep a few packets on hand at all time so that I can quickly whip up an APA or IPA recipe and brew when I don't have time to make a starter with liquid yeast.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 07:08 PM   #25
ApothecaryBrewing
Recipes 
 
Nov 2012
Rochester, NY
Posts: 487
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts


I like what I am hearing about US-05, it may become my go to yeast. Cheaper than WLP001 and with an AA of 75-85%, that sounds like just what I need in my pale ales.
__________________
Brewpothecary

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 07:14 PM   #26
Obliviousbrew
 
Obliviousbrew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Feb 2012
Benidorm, Alicante/Spain
Posts: 1,567
Liked 229 Times on 160 Posts


Iīve used many times and itīs my back up yeast. Itīs pretty clean good attenautor. Flocculation is not very good. Good yeast overall.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 07:38 PM   #27
jkendal
Recipes 
 
Jun 2012
Burton, TX
Posts: 219
Liked 12 Times on 9 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by VTrookie View Post
So for my entire homebrewing career (9-10 batches) I have always stuck with liquid yeast. I typically use WLP001 California Ale as I tend to hover around the paler, drier ales.

Recently I have been considering trying out dry yeast and was wondering what other brewers experiences with US-05 have been. What sort of flavor, if any, does it impart on the beer? I have read it is a rather transparent yeast and works well at accentuating the malt and hops but at higher temps it can produce some fruity flavors? Has anyone experienced this?

I enjoy hops and a lot of them. IPA and DIPA are my go to styles. Does this yeast compliment that or will it sit in the background and let those hops shine.

How is the attenuation and flocculation on this strain? Can I expect a clean, clear beer at the end or am I looking at a cloudy haze of a hung up fermentation?

Liquid yeast is just plain expensive and it seems dry yeast is more reliable and cheaper. So home brewers of this great portal of knowledge, unleash your praise and criticisms of US-05.
Before I was able to ferment in a fridge with temp control, US-05 wouldn't settle out for a long time (4 weeks and even longer and it was still a bit cloudy) so I avoided it in favor of WLP001. But now that I can cold crash, it clears out just fine - I prefer it now over WLP001 simply because it's cheaper and I don't have to make a starter. Ferment between 65-68 and it comes out very clean and neutral every time. It's a great yeast.
__________________
We've got provisions and lots of beer
The key word is survival on the new frontier
~ Donald Fagen

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 10:03 PM   #28
Jayhem
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Culpeper, VA
Posts: 2,640
Liked 279 Times on 225 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by VTrookie View Post
I like what I am hearing about US-05, it may become my go to yeast. Cheaper than WLP001 and with an AA of 75-85%, that sounds like just what I need in my pale ales.
If the only yeasts you have are US-05 and Nottingham you can brew almost any style you want with those 2 choices. I always have washed Notty or US-05 in my fridge ready to pitch to a starter.
__________________
Next up: Amber Ale
Primary 1&2: 90 Min IPA clone
Primary 3&4: Belgian Wit
Keg #1: White Mosaic Pale Ale
Keg #2: Empty
Drinking: Amber Ale, White Mosaic Pale Ale

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 12:56 AM   #29
mooshimanx
Recipes 
 
Jan 2012
san diego, california
Posts: 215
Liked 20 Times on 17 Posts


I've never once been able to tell the difference between US-05 and WLP001. If I'm going to use liquid, I usually just go with WLP090 though. It tastes very similar to WLP001 to me but finishes fermenting slightly faster (which means I can go grain to glass in 2 weeks or so if I'm doing a light enough ale).

 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 03:38 AM   #30
dannypo
Recipes 
 
Jan 2007
Near Detroit
Posts: 353
Liked 42 Times on 30 Posts


I don't like US-05 in lighter styles like blonde ales or american wheat because that peach ester just doesn't taste right to me. That being said I used it today in a IIPA. In most beers I can't tell the difference.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safale T-58? squeekybobo Fermentation & Yeast 6 09-09-2012 10:34 PM
safale us-05 meadsupporter Fermentation & Yeast 6 03-18-2012 04:28 AM
Safale s-33 jonmohno Fermentation & Yeast 4 08-06-2011 01:28 AM
Safale US-04 EddieB428 Fermentation & Yeast 9 07-21-2011 03:16 PM
Fermentation stuck... Safale or not to Safale agurkas Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 14 02-28-2011 05:14 AM


Forum Jump