Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Extra Week of Primary vs Extra Week in Bottles
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2012, 02:04 PM   #11
Jayhem
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Culpeper, VA
Posts: 2,639
Liked 277 Times on 224 Posts
Likes Given: 1252

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbrews View Post
Regarding the comments of the last two posters, I just want to address the falsity of trub flavor going into your beer if it's left in the primary for 3-5 weeks, and the poor practice of racking as soon as desired FG is reached.

The first situation will not happen unless yeast autolyzation sets in after a period of months. Furthermore, after the yeast use sugar and oxygen to create alcohol and carbon dioxide, their job is still technically not complete. Your beer may very well at target FG, but it will also contain a ton of precursor laden off flavors. These precursors should really be reabsorbed by the yeast if you want a quality beer. This takes time - usually takes 3-4 weeks total in the carboy in the 60's (F). Lastly, I've noticed 17-21 days of bottle conditioning at 72 F is ideal for my ales.
Highly agreed!

Once I started leaving my beers in primary for a minimum of 21 days they have improved greatly! Yeast need time to clean up their fermentation bi-products!


__________________
Next up: Amber Ale
Primary 1&2: 90 Min IPA clone
Primary 3&4: Belgian Wit
Keg #1: White Mosaic Pale Ale
Keg #2: Empty
Drinking: Amber Ale, White Mosaic Pale Ale
Jayhem is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 02:21 PM   #12
unionrdr
struggling author
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
unionrdr's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sheffield, Ohio
Posts: 35,156
Liked 3027 Times on 2608 Posts
Likes Given: 2143

Default

Yes,definitly. I let the beer get down to FG,then let it sit another 3-7 days to clean up & settle out clear or slightly misty. Then bottle. They'll nedd time to not only carbonate,but condition as well. I've found conditioning takes about a week longer than carbonating on average. It does depend on the gravity/ABV as well.


__________________
My sci-fi & home brewing books on amazon-kindle now! New additions coming!
NEW, REVISED EDITION of book one of Time Lords 2034 series now on Amazon Kindle! http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NTA0L6G
My homebrewing book "Tippy Tippy Tappy" on Kindle! http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00PBAP6JO
unionrdr is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 02:55 PM   #13
jerrodm
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 636
Liked 121 Times on 87 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

+1 for bob's comments. There's a very strong case to be made for leaving it on the primary for longer than what is strictly needed to bring it down to FG (if Revvy were here, he'd give you many more reasons why). But if it's already been on for three weeks, I'd say extra time in the bottle is probably more beneficial than extra time on the primary, on balance. But leaving the beer on the primary for 4 weeks as opposed to 3 will almost always give you better, clearer, cleaner-tasting beer, as opposed to imparting "trub flavors", whatever that means. And autolysis generally takes WAY longer to become an issue than the time periods you're dealing with here. Don't fear the primary!
jerrodm is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 02:55 PM   #14
Golddiggie
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Golddiggie's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Between here and there, and everywhere
Posts: 12,063
Liked 483 Times on 423 Posts
Likes Given: 266

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcbrewcom View Post
Being new to this I have put together my own kit which currently doesn't include a hydrometer. I've been meaning to pick one up so maybe this will give me the kick needed to pick one up.
Get either a hydrometer or refractometer ASAP. Having a way to get gravity readings is important. I'd say its even more important (critical) for new brewers. Until you've brewed enough with the same yeast, under a range of conditions, you need a way to KNOW when its actually done. Then you can let taste tell you when its time to move the batch to next steps (bottle, etc.).
__________________
Hopping Tango Brewery

跟猴子比丟屎 ・ Gun HOE-tze bee DIO-se

On Tap: Caramel Ale, Mocha Porter II, MO SMaSH IPA
Waiting/Carbonating: 12.5% Wee Honey II, 8.9% Old Ale, English Brown Ale, Lickah ESB, Mocha Porter II
Fermenting
K1:
K2: Epic mead
K3: TripSix
On Deck: Caramel Ale
Aging:mead
Mead [bottled]:Oaked Wildflower Traditional, Mocha Madness, Blackberry Melomel, maple wine
Golddiggie is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 03:39 PM   #15
Homercidal
Licensed Sensual Massage Therapist.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Homercidal's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Reed City, MI
Posts: 27,398
Liked 3656 Times on 2487 Posts
Likes Given: 2473

Default

Check the gravity. If it's terminal, then bottle at the 4 weeks. 1 extra week or so should be good enough for any yeast clean up.

I'd rather have a better chance at proper carbonation than worry about 4 vs 5 weeks primary.
Homercidal is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:45 PM   #16
matt-tastic
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 83
Liked 12 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbrews View Post
Regarding the comments of the last two posters, I just want to address the falsity of trub flavor going into your beer if it's left in the primary for 3-5 weeks, and the poor practice of racking as soon as desired FG is reached.

The first situation will not happen unless yeast autolyzation sets in after a period of months. Furthermore, after the yeast use sugar and oxygen to create alcohol and carbon dioxide (which takes a total of 3-7 days) their job is still technically not complete. Your beer may very well at target FG, but it will also contain a ton of precursor laden off flavors. These precursors should really be reabsorbed by the yeast if you want a quality beer. This takes time - usually takes 3-4 weeks total in the carboy in the 60's (F). Lastly, I've noticed 17-21 days of bottle conditioning at 72 F is ideal for my ales.
I'm not arguing, by any means, but hadn't read anywhere about the yeast cleanup. It makes perfect sense, but i've read a couple brewing books & guides and hadn't come across it.

I also agree with your conditioning process. room temps for 2-3 weeks at a start. I usually only put beers in the fridge when i know i'm going to drink them in the next week or so.

A question. would leaving in the primary to let the yeast "clean up" be better than racking to secondary, or are the generally the same process?
matt-tastic is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:50 PM   #17
duboman
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 6,365
Liked 506 Times on 468 Posts
Likes Given: 226

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt-tastic

I'm not arguing, by any means, but hadn't read anywhere about the yeast cleanup. It makes perfect sense, but i've read a couple brewing books & guides and hadn't come across it.

I also agree with your conditioning process. room temps for 2-3 weeks at a start. I usually only put beers in the fridge when i know i'm going to drink them in the next week or so.

A question. would leaving in the primary to let the yeast "clean up" be better than racking to secondary, or are the generally the same process?
Leaving the yeast in primary is more beneficial to clean up since its the yeast that does the cleaning up. If you rack to secondary you leave the yeast behind
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
duboman is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:06 PM   #18
matt-tastic
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 83
Liked 12 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duboman View Post
Leaving the yeast in primary is more beneficial to clean up since its the yeast that does the cleaning up. If you rack to secondary you leave the yeast behind
Thanks. I would think that the yeast left in suspension would still get the job done in secondary, but i'll try leaving my next one in primary longer to see if there is a considerable difference.

matt-tastic is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:12 PM   #19
bobbrews
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sierra, Nevada
Posts: 4,020
Liked 426 Times on 343 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt-tastic View Post
A question. would leaving in the primary to let the yeast "clean up" be better than racking to secondary, or are the generally the same process?
It's not better or worse. Either way, there should still be plenty of live yeast in your beer to ensure proper clean up.

That said, if I were racking to secondary, I wouldn't do it until around week 3 (or when it was time to dryhop). Reason being, I would want as much clarity as possible. Let gravity, patience, and time do 90% of the work for you in that regard.


bobbrews is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leaving Cider in Primary an extra week or two vekzero Cider Forum 2 01-02-2012 10:14 PM
1st Mead - Extra Week In Primary albeerquerquean Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 03-03-2010 11:47 PM
Spiced ale: extra week in the fermenter, or in the bottle? uncleozzy Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 11-18-2008 03:28 PM
Extra week in secondary? schneemann Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 06-25-2008 02:41 PM
Extra, extra, extra late addition david_42 General Techniques 1 04-23-2007 01:52 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS