Is WLP002 really that fast?? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Is WLP002 really that fast??

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2012, 05:07 PM   #1
SFGiantsFan925
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
East Bay, CA
Posts: 880
Liked 391 Times on 230 Posts



Hey everyone. So I brewed up a spiced brown ale the other day. 6 days ago actually. Its an extract based recipe. I made a starter of WLP002, and pitched it at about 74 deg F, then brought the temp down into the mid 60's as White Labs website states thats the best ferm temps for this yeast.

Well, I had a LOT of activity within an hour or two of pitching. I had to use a blowoff tube as the krausen was pouring out of my tube. It was a 6 gal fermenter and was a crazy fermentation. I pitched the yeast around 1PM on Friday, and by Sunday morning there was pretty much no activity. Krausen was gone and very few if any bubbles from the airlock I replace the tube with. So, today I took a gravity reading to see where it was at since there really looks like no activity. Heres what it came out to be:

OG- 1.072
FG- 1.018 (as of yesterday)

That gives me an attuation of 75% and ehite labs states it attenuates 63-70%. I am thinking I wont be getting my gravity much lower.

Does this seem right?? Can this yeast really ferment that quickly?? That seems like a super fast ferment. Its my first time using a starter, and I was rather impressed with how quickly it started.

Recipe in case it matters:
9lb LME
1lb Belgian Candi Sugar
.5 Crystal 60
.5 lb Victory
.25lb Carapils
.25 Chocolate

1oz Perle hops for bittering at 60
.5oz Northern at 15 min



 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 05:29 PM   #2
duboman
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Glenview, IL
Posts: 6,368
Liked 508 Times on 470 Posts


Yes it can go through active fermentation that quick but most likely it's not yet done. Give it another week as it may still drop a few points as well as giving things a chance to clear up.


__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 05:56 PM   #3
deggenbe
Recipes 
 
Mar 2011
westland, michigan
Posts: 140
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


the yeast will finish up doing other things as well, even if fermentation for the most part is done. just let em do their thing.
__________________
Nothing fermenting ATM

Sons of Liberty Homebrew Member
https://sites.google.com/site/sonsof...yhomebrewclub/

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 06:16 PM   #4
WesleyS
Registered User
Recipes 
 
May 2012
Posts: 13,516
Liked 4216 Times on 2789 Posts


My experiences with 002 have been pretty much the same as yours. Strong, active fermentation for a day or two then nothing. I still let it sit for about three weeks anyways to let the yeast clean up then clear.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 06:23 PM   #5
DrinkNoH2O
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 556
Liked 33 Times on 23 Posts


WLP002 is an awesome yeast, I got like 80% attenuation using it in my FW Union Jack IPA clone. It fermented to final gravity in less than 4 days.

For your beer next time I might recommend pitching at fermenting temp rather than so warm (74). The warm temp will certainly help the fermentation get off to a rapid start however could throw some off flavors as well.

Even though your beer is almost to FG I would also recommend letting it sit in primary for another 2 weeks to let the yeast cleanup after themselves.

Looks like a tasty recipe, you'll have to let us know how it turns out!


P.S. - WLP002 Flocs like a rock, you'll have crystal clear beer in no time with it.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 09:10 PM   #6
SFGiantsFan925
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
East Bay, CA
Posts: 880
Liked 391 Times on 230 Posts


Well, I hope it didnt come across like I was going to keg it right away. I was just rather surprised that it could drop to pretty much the FG in that short of time. I am planning on letting it sit in the fermenter for about 3 more weeks. I am planning on adding orange peel and coriander after a few more days and letting it sit for another week before racking. I am rather impressed with this yeast so far. I think making my first ever starter did help also!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 10:31 PM   #7
2bluewagons
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
2bluewagons's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Taichung, TW / Portland, OR
Posts: 356
Liked 27 Times on 19 Posts


Yep, my experience with Wyeast 1968 is very similar. Love that yeast.

Although with a Mild I just finished I thought that I would skip the starter and just pitch the smacked pack into my 1.038 wort. No activity for 48 hours, then a slow krauzen for half a day or so, and then a few days of ticking off a single gravity point per day until getting to FG, all in the span of a week or so. Wasn't bad, but not what I expected for such a small beer. So, even with small beers I think I will be making starters, even if it is a small one.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 10:46 PM   #8
ModernDayNord
Recipes 
 
Sep 2012
Sparta, TN
Posts: 20


I had the same experience six months ago. Same style, same yeast, same logic...I'll be making starters for my low gravity sessions as well. Beer turned out fine, ftr.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 08:46 PM   #9
MrOH
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 175
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


I used it in a smoked mild (OG 1.036) a week and a half ago. Active ferment was over in TWO days, gave the carboy a good swirl, and again a couple of days later, and it had dropped bright in a week, and I didn't detect any diacityl, so I bottled it.
I know, I know, let it clean up. My logic is that if it has completely flocced out, then it is done working.
__________________
Peace and bacon grease

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 05:30 PM   #10
winvarin
Recipes 
 
Apr 2009
Edmond, OK
Posts: 1,136
Liked 54 Times on 49 Posts


I have an add on question about WLP002. I have not used this yeast in some time, so my memory (and notes) are a bit foggy on the subject. Has anybody had a problem with this yeast kicking off a bit slow when not making a starter?

I didn't under pitch by any means. I just found myself with ingredients and a day off yesterday so I made an English Brown. Since I didn't have time for a starter, I made a trip to the brew shop and picked up 2 vials of 002 before commencing the brew day. My particulars:

- 1.054 SG (mashed at 154 for a little residual malt sweetness)
- 5 gallons, pitched 2 vials of WLP002 that had come up to room temperature while I was chilling the wort and cleaning up my gear
- Wort was reading 66F on the fermometer on my better bottle, right in the sweet spot for this yeast.
- Best by date on both vials was Feb 10, 2013 (which means it was likely packaged just 2 or 3 weeks ago).
- Aerated with about 90 sec of pure O2 before pitching

Pitched both vials at 6 pm yesterday. When I left for work at 730 this morning, I had no krausen or signs of active ferment in the BB. I roused the yeast once last night and again this morning as I know this yeast has a temp to floc like a stone.

If memory serves, I think the last time I tried making a starter with this yeast, I had a little trouble getting it to kick off initially in the flask. Once it got going, it grew like crazy. I pitched that starter at high krausen so it had no trouble getting going. I am just wondering if this time, with mid 60s for temps and the fact that the yeast still had to wake up from a dead sleep since they were effectively dormant in the vial.

Not overly concerned. More curious than anything else.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uses for WLP002 asidrane Recipes/Ingredients 11 11-05-2011 05:36 PM
Wlp002 rambler Fermentation & Yeast 6 04-08-2011 04:04 PM
Wlp002 daveooph131 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 1 07-06-2010 07:55 PM
Fast fermentation of Winter Warmer...too fast? jim12180 Fermentation & Yeast 2 12-14-2009 08:34 PM
WLP002 - Krausen fell too fast? shawnbou General Beer Discussion 5 11-18-2009 08:54 PM


Forum Jump