Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > My First BIAB Experience *PICS*
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2012, 04:33 AM   #21
Brulosopher
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Brulosopher's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,870
Liked 296 Times on 226 Posts
Likes Given: 200

Default

I raised the temp in my fermentation freezer from 63 to 69... and my airlock was bubbling like crazy when I got home for work. Ahh, finally.


__________________
Brulosophy is a place to experiment with home brews. If you've had a crazy idea or wondered how something worked please visit us at Brulosophy.com!

List of exBEERiments

How To Easily Harvest Clean Yeast from Starters

Make Good Lager in Less Time!

Marshall "Brulosopher" Schott
Brulosopher is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 07:38 PM   #22
Brulosopher
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Brulosopher's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,870
Liked 296 Times on 226 Posts
Likes Given: 200

Default

Just dumped it... BIAB is great. That beer? Not so much... ugh!


__________________
Brulosophy is a place to experiment with home brews. If you've had a crazy idea or wondered how something worked please visit us at Brulosophy.com!

List of exBEERiments

How To Easily Harvest Clean Yeast from Starters

Make Good Lager in Less Time!

Marshall "Brulosopher" Schott
Brulosopher is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 07:44 PM   #23
dbsmith
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 413
Liked 27 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 24

Default

Well if the whole point of this post was to make us jealous of your brewery setup..it worked!! grr.
dbsmith is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 07:46 PM   #24
Brulosopher
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Brulosopher's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,870
Liked 296 Times on 226 Posts
Likes Given: 200

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbsmith
Well if the whole point of this post was to make us jealous of your brewery setup..it worked!! grr.
Hahaha... or to embarrass myself I'm currently using the setup now, brewing two 5 gal batches side by side- Stout and Sticke
__________________
Brulosophy is a place to experiment with home brews. If you've had a crazy idea or wondered how something worked please visit us at Brulosophy.com!

List of exBEERiments

How To Easily Harvest Clean Yeast from Starters

Make Good Lager in Less Time!

Marshall "Brulosopher" Schott
Brulosopher is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 12:04 AM   #25
BrotherGrim
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrotherGrim's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: , Mississippi
Posts: 346
Liked 70 Times on 49 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Glad you enjoyed your BIAB experience. Regarding your low efficiency, remember you won't stick a mash with BIAB so grind the crap out of your grain. Check out the pictures. I get my grain bills milled when I order them, then I run them through my corona mill again on brewday. Note how much finer it is after the second grind. I use Irish Moss at the end of the boil, and my beers are crystal clear.
Click image for larger version

Name:	Milled from HBS.jpg
Views:	175
Size:	48.1 KB
ID:	79420   Click image for larger version

Name:	Re-Milled.jpg
Views:	176
Size:	52.6 KB
ID:	79421  
__________________
AHA Member, Mississippi Brewer's Guild, Hattiesburg Beer Club, Raise Your Pints, and Outlaw Homebrewer

Eschew obfuscation
BrotherGrim is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 09:24 PM   #26
AnchorBock
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 578
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brulosopher
Just read this, and sighed... from BYO:

The problem with thin mashes is enzyme stability. Enzymes are less stable in a thin mash and denaturation can become a real problem. The enzyme of concern is beta-amylase, since there is a limiting supply of beta-amylase in comparison to alpha-amylase. If beta-amylase denatures too quickly, then the resulting wort will have a decreased fermentability.

Sh!t
I mash pretty thin and have never had any issues with fermentability, or lack thereof at least. I shoot for 6.5 gallons of wort post boil and usually start with around 8-9 gallons depending on grist and boil time.
__________________
Homebrewing blog: http://bagendbrewery.wordpress.com

Beer Engine Caskegerator - Hand pump/keg enclosure for Real Ale at home.
AnchorBock is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 01:13 AM   #27
ArcLight
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Millburn, NJ
Posts: 1,285
Liked 103 Times on 82 Posts
Likes Given: 101

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnchorBock View Post
I mash pretty thin and have never had any issues with fermentability, or lack thereof at least. I shoot for 6.5 gallons of wort post boil and usually start with around 8-9 gallons depending on grist and boil time.
Define "thin". It means different things in different contexts.
For traditional mashing, 2- may be considered thin.
For BIAB I am wondering if 3-1 is ok. 4-1?
For "thin" BIAB mashes, call it 4-1, I think you need to mash longer, and ad lower temperatures. I think a 4-1 thickness (thinness) at 156 would not work as well, due to the Beta Amylase being denatured.


The only problem with grinding too fine is you may end up with flour (and husk bits) in your ferementor.
ArcLight is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 01:49 AM   #28
AnchorBock
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 578
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcLight View Post
Define "thin". It means different things in different contexts.
For traditional mashing, 2- may be considered thin.
For BIAB I am wondering if 3-1 is ok. 4-1?
For "thin" BIAB mashes, call it 4-1, I think you need to mash longer, and ad lower temperatures. I think a 4-1 thickness (thinness) at 156 would not work as well, due to the Beta Amylase being denatured.


The only problem with grinding too fine is you may end up with flour (and husk bits) in your ferementor.
Last few batches ranged from 2.5 qt/lb (mash at 151, 16 lbs grist) up to 3.95 qt/lb (mash at 158, 8 lbs grist). I do full volume mashes always and haven't found the water-grist ratio to be too important for my process. I've been experimenting with 60 minute mashes for some batches lately and have definitely found that to produce a less fermentable wort than a 90 minute mash(which is what I was targeting) and my efficiency has dropped a couple % as well, but this isn't real definitive data yet.

I agree about grinding too fine - I use the standard setting at the LHBS and don't mind if there's a hit to efficiency to avoid grinding to a pulp and ending up with even more trub than I already do (I leave 1.25-1.5 gallons of wort/trub behind every batch).
__________________
Homebrewing blog: http://bagendbrewery.wordpress.com

Beer Engine Caskegerator - Hand pump/keg enclosure for Real Ale at home.
AnchorBock is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 11:41 AM   #29
ArcLight
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Millburn, NJ
Posts: 1,285
Liked 103 Times on 82 Posts
Likes Given: 101

Default

>.up to 3.95 qt/lb (mash at 158, 8 lbs grist).

I am interested in the mash thinness vs conversion curve. At what point is the mash too thin, with respect to OG and FG? At some point I would like to experiment. Maybe 3 experiments 2-1, 3-1, 4-1, at 150F. I suspect the thinner mashes need more time (90+ minutes instead of 60). Then repeat at 155F, see if the Beta Amylase is denatured before it can do its job.
On the other hand, a tight crush may partially offset the thinness, so it would require quite a few experiments, especially if one wants to repeat them, though I could do them on my stove with small quantities of grain and water.

>.up to 3.95 qt/lb (mash at 158, 8 lbs grist).
At that temperature it just seems "too thin", as the Beta Amylase gets denatured quickly.
I think this will be noticeably less fermentable.
But without an experiment, there is no proof as to what is too thin.

When I BIAB mash I aim for full volume + grain, but its never thinner than 3-1.
The bigger gain bills are a problem, as I mash thicker, and then soak the bag in 2 gallons to rinse out the extra sugar.
ArcLight is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2012, 12:06 PM   #30
AnchorBock
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 578
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcLight View Post
>.up to 3.95 qt/lb (mash at 158, 8 lbs grist).

I am interested in the mash thinness vs conversion curve. At what point is the mash too thin, with respect to OG and FG? At some point I would like to experiment. Maybe 3 experiments 2-1, 3-1, 4-1, at 150F. I suspect the thinner mashes need more time (90+ minutes instead of 60). Then repeat at 155F, see if the Beta Amylase is denatured before it can do its job.
On the other hand, a tight crush may partially offset the thinness, so it would require quite a few experiments, especially if one wants to repeat them, though I could do them on my stove with small quantities of grain and water.

>.up to 3.95 qt/lb (mash at 158, 8 lbs grist).
At that temperature it just seems "too thin", as the Beta Amylase gets denatured quickly.
I think this will be noticeably less fermentable.
But without an experiment, there is no proof as to what is too thin.

When I BIAB mash I aim for full volume + grain, but its never thinner than 3-1.
The bigger gain bills are a problem, as I mash thicker, and then soak the bag in 2 gallons to rinse out the extra sugar.
Have you read this - http://braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php...fusion_mashing ?

"water to grist ratio: the enzymatic activity of the amylases is effected by the thickness of the mash. Thinner mashes enhance the maltose production and therefore increase the fermentability."

The 158 mash with 8 lbs of grist was only a 60 minute mash and went from 1.042 to 1.016 (Scottish 70/-) with WLP001 - I really haven't seen a change in attenuation based on mash thickness, only on the sach rest temp. Thinner mashes with BIAB seem to increase mash efficiency though - hard to say if that's only from using less grain though as opposed to the thin mash.


__________________
Homebrewing blog: http://bagendbrewery.wordpress.com

Beer Engine Caskegerator - Hand pump/keg enclosure for Real Ale at home.
AnchorBock is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my first BIAB and All Grain experience ArcLight All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 07-10-2012 07:00 PM
Planning My First All-Grain BIAB Experience... mavandeh All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 13 06-23-2012 04:46 AM
Discrepency in gravity with BIAB, not enough experience to know why Geordan All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 7 03-15-2012 09:57 PM
First BIAB went... OK. (with pics) dooman333 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 22 01-31-2012 02:01 AM
Obligatory first AG experience-BIAB Daddymem All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 15 05-13-2009 07:17 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS