Secondary fermenter myth - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Secondary fermenter myth

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2012, 01:03 AM   #1
Woodyswoodchuck
Recipes 
 
Jul 2012
Posts: 25
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts



So after talking with some local professional brewers, all of whom used to be/still are home brewers, told me that there is actually no real benefit to home brewers to using a secondary fermenter. Does anyone have any info to the contrary?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 01:17 AM   #2
duboman
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Glenview, IL
Posts: 6,368
Liked 508 Times on 470 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodyswoodchuck
So after talking with some local professional brewers, all of whom used to be/still are home brewers, told me that there is actually no real benefit to home brewers to using a secondary fermenter. Does anyone have any info to the contrary?
First off, in the true sense of the term it is really a secondary vessel or bright tank. Meaning there shod be no further fermentation occurring. It is used for oaking, racking fruit clearing the beer or dry hopping( although many do this in the primary as well)

There are countless threads on this forum discussing pros and cons to using one and a very simple search will yield you days of reading material if not a life time

Secondary fermentation is a process that actually creates a second round of fermentation such as priming your bottles. The suspended yeast consumes the priming sugar producing CO 2 and carbonating the bottles. This is an example of secondary fermentation.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 01:23 AM   #3
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,884
Liked 8089 Times on 5645 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodyswoodchuck View Post
So after talking with some local professional brewers, all of whom used to be/still are home brewers, told me that there is actually no real benefit to home brewers to using a secondary fermenter. Does anyone have any info to the contrary?
No, I don't think most homebrewers would argue that a "secondary" would be necessary. I haven't used one in years, except when oaking.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 01:41 AM   #4
inhousebrew
Recipes 
 
Aug 2012
minneapolis, minnesota
Posts: 1,486
Liked 130 Times on 117 Posts


Skip it for anything you don't want to bulk age or add fruit/oak/hops to.
__________________
I hate Walder Frey...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 02:01 AM   #5
tedclev
Recipes 
 
Sep 2010
Asheville, NC
Posts: 144
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


It used to be more beneficial when yeast quality was far worse than it is now.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 02:05 AM   #6
fbold1
Brew Nut
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
fbold1's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
North Coast, Ohio
Posts: 255
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodyswoodchuck
So after talking with some local professional brewers, all of whom used to be/still are home brewers, told me that there is actually no real benefit to home brewers to using a secondary fermenter. Does anyone have any info to the contrary?
Almost every home brewing book that i have read says that it helps the flavor and clarity to use a secondary. Brewer's best kits all recommend it. It's up to you, if you're happy with your results, that's all that counts.
__________________
"Whoever makes a poor beer is transferred to the dung-hill." Edict in the City of Danzig, 11th Century.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 03:06 AM   #7
Misplaced_Canuck
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Misplaced_Canuck's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
NE Columbia SC - Formerly, Montreal Canada
Posts: 2,888
Liked 166 Times on 134 Posts


Meh... Use it if it works for you. I do. I get about a 1/4" layer of residue (yeast/etc) in the SECONDARY, about 3/4"-1" or so in the primary.

Do whatever works and/or you prefer.

MC
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misplaced_Canuck
Carbonic bite? Is that like the bubonic plague?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebstauffer
Needless to say after more than a few drams my mental efficiency matched my mashing efficiency.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 03:12 AM   #8
lumpher
Recipes 
 
Jul 2009
texas
Posts: 5,070
Liked 268 Times on 229 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
No, I don't think most homebrewers would argue that a "secondary" would be necessary. I haven't used one in years, except when oaking.
+1. a secondary wastes a good primary. also, like is said previously in this thread, there's years of reading on this argument in this forum alone
__________________
There is no "i" in denial.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 05:13 PM   #9
logan3825
Recipes 
 
Sep 2010
Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,031
Liked 51 Times on 37 Posts


Some good reading on secondary fermentation. Jamil and John Palmer being 2 of the most recognized homebrewers in the US. I believe Jamil went pro last year.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 07:57 PM   #10
Misplaced_Canuck
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Misplaced_Canuck's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
NE Columbia SC - Formerly, Montreal Canada
Posts: 2,888
Liked 166 Times on 134 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by logan3825 View Post
Some good reading on secondary fermentation. Jamil and John Palmer being 2 of the most recognized homebrewers in the US. I believe Jamil went pro last year.
It is. However they only address the issue of autolysis. In my case I secondary to help clarify, and leave even more yeast behind. Just a personal preference.

MC
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misplaced_Canuck
Carbonic bite? Is that like the bubonic plague?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebstauffer
Needless to say after more than a few drams my mental efficiency matched my mashing efficiency.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump