Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > Need help: HUGE beer stuck
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2012, 10:06 PM   #11
Mischief_Brewing
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sayreville, NJ, NJ
Posts: 1,264
Liked 13 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

1.138 to 1.042 is 12.8% by volume, 10.2% by weight.

I figure that if I blend it with a 1.070 of the same recipe, I should be at a blended 1.10# if it were at the OG of the first beer, which if I get any sort of decent attenuation, I should be able to land right around 10%.

I started this one with safale 05, racked it onto a fresh cake of 099 high gravity when it finished, and then forgot about it for 6 months. When I checked gravity before racking over to secondary for the oak cubes, I saw it was stuck in the 40s.

I added amylase and a package of 1118 and waited a month. Nothing happened. Added more amylase and another package of 1118 and ignored it for another 8 months. Tried it a few months back and it was still at 1.042

It's super delicious/complex, but cloyingly sweet. I couldn't drink more than 6 ounces at a time.

I'm crushing the grains tonight and will brew this blender batch after work Weds. I really hope this works. I want to be drinking this by my birthday in October....


Mischief_Brewing is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 10:11 PM   #12
Dan
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dan's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Makakilo, Hawaii
Posts: 6,594
Liked 2053 Times on 1275 Posts
Likes Given: 2921

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mischief_Brewing View Post
1.138 to 1.042 is 12.8% by volume, 10.2% by weight.
Geez.. I should have just stayed in bed today, can't seem to get anything right. You MB are definitely on your A game. I think I'll ride the short bus tomorrow.

Hope your beer turns out great!

BTW.. no sarcasm intended.


Dan is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 11:23 PM   #13
phoenixs4r
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hayward, California
Posts: 1,516
Liked 55 Times on 50 Posts
Likes Given: 38

Default

I heard the high gravity yeast is a super bitch to use. Did you re oxygenate?
phoenixs4r is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 11:34 PM   #14
Mischief_Brewing
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sayreville, NJ, NJ
Posts: 1,264
Liked 13 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

I splashed the hell out of it on transfer, and considering it was a fresh cake from a 1.080 beer that I moved after 6 days, it should have worked.

I think I just created a toxic environment for any yeast that I introduced. Safale 05 took it to 12% on its own...
Mischief_Brewing is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:05 AM   #15
eastoak
Senior Member
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: oakland, california
Posts: 3,269
Liked 156 Times on 146 Posts
Likes Given: 89

Default

well, after a year of tinkering....
eastoak is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:09 AM   #16
daksin
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
daksin's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,435
Liked 320 Times on 276 Posts
Likes Given: 346

Default

Dude, your beer isn't stuck, it's DONE. There is no more fermentable sugar left in that beer, even the WLP099 isn't going to help you there. A quick google search shows that various vintages of Dark Lord have had their FGs measured between 1.033 and 1.064 (!!!).
__________________
I can't be arsed to keep up this list of what's in the fermenters, but hey, check out the cool brewery I own!

twitter.com/2kidsbrewing .. facebook.com/2kidsbrewing .. 2kidsbrewing.com
daksin is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:15 AM   #17
Mischief_Brewing
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sayreville, NJ, NJ
Posts: 1,264
Liked 13 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daksin
A quick google search shows that various vintages of Dark Lord have had their FGs measured between 1.033 and 1.064 (!!!).
Whoah. 1.064 is sickeningly sweet!

This is what I thought and why I'm going for the blend. I'm going to mash pretty low and hope that the mix of the two gets me into the low thirties or high 20s final.
Mischief_Brewing is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 04:00 AM   #18
phoenixs4r
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hayward, California
Posts: 1,516
Liked 55 Times on 50 Posts
Likes Given: 38

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daksin
Dude, your beer isn't stuck, it's DONE. There is no more fermentable sugar left in that beer, even the WLP099 isn't going to help you there. A quick google search shows that various vintages of Dark Lord have had their FGs measured between 1.033 and 1.064 (!!!).
I don't agree. My barleywine went from a similar gravity to a much lower finish, and that was a single packet of safale05. I don't have notes in front of me but I recall it being 14%. This beer shouldn't have quit at 12. ESPECIALLY with a second yeast added.
phoenixs4r is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 04:57 AM   #19
pdxal
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,360
Liked 123 Times on 113 Posts
Likes Given: 209

Default

The batch is at roughly 70% attenuation, which isn't bad even though it is sweet. More yeast hasn't helped it, so I would agree that it is done. Blending is about your only option. Good luck.
pdxal is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 05:35 AM   #20
TheBeerist
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Ana, CA
Posts: 250
Liked 12 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mischief_Brewing View Post
I splashed the hell out of it on transfer, and considering it was a fresh cake from a 1.080 beer that I moved after 6 days, it should have worked.

I think I just created a toxic environment for any yeast that I introduced. Safale 05 took it to 12% on its own...
Why would you pitch from an already high gravity brew onto an even higher gravity brew? The yeast was probably stressed already fermenting that first beer out. Like others have said, 70% attenuation isn't terrible. But I'd never pitch the yeast cake from a 1.080 beer personally.


TheBeerist is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools



Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS