Standard IPA / IIPA grain bill - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Standard IPA / IIPA grain bill

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2012, 06:08 AM   #1
FreshZ
 
FreshZ's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
St. Louis, MO
Posts: 334
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts



What is your standard IPA grain bill?
How bout your standard IIPA grain bill?
Any SMaSH IPA suggestions?

I've got tons of hops and a few recipes in the queue, but after those, I'm gonna make a couple IPA's and IIPA's. What say you on the grain bill for each?
__________________
Primary: Nothing
Primary: Nothing
Secondary: MVP (Manly Vanilla Porter),
Bottled: Cali Common, I.P.K., CTZ SMaSH yeast experiment, FUBAR IPA, Barleywine, Columbus Day Milk Stout, Narwhal ESB...
On Deck: Domaine DuPage clone, Heady Topper clone, Oaked Imp. Stout

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 06:17 AM   #2
Jebu1788
Recipes 
 
Sep 2009
Posts: 440
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


I don't know about "standard," but I've used this base a couple times with quite tasty results:

10lbs 2-row
2lbs Vienna
1lb Crystal 40 (or 60)

For 5 gallons, gets to about 1.070 figuring 75% efficiency.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 02:01 PM   #3
bobbrews
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Sierra, Nevada
Posts: 4,034
Liked 439 Times on 350 Posts


They're usually mostly 2-row pale malt of some kind (80-90%) mixed with a small portion (5% or so) of carapils and/or wheat malt and/or oats and/or rye and/or vienna and/or pilsener malt and/or sugar and/or munich and/or crystal malt and/or honey malt.

There's no huge distinction between the typical IPA vs. IIPA grain bills aside from quantity.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 02:23 PM   #4
Jebu1788
Recipes 
 
Sep 2009
Posts: 440
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


I have to disagree. There seems to be one big distinction in grain bills: how much malt/sweetness there is. Compare beers with recipes that have been circulated like Pliny the Elder and G'Knight. Pliny is dry without "malty" grains or a lot sweet crystal malts, while G'Knight has a high amount of medium colored crystal, along with Munich. Pliny uses simple sugars to dry it out even further, G'Knight doesn't. And the taste is quite evident.

Of course, I do agree that the hops are the main focus of an IPA, but the grain bill sets the tone.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 02:32 PM   #5
RC0032
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
Chicago
Posts: 1,133
Liked 16 Times on 13 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by jeburgdo View Post
I don't know about "standard," but I've used this base a couple times with quite tasty results:

10lbs 2-row
2lbs Vienna
1lb Crystal 40 (or 60)

For 5 gallons, gets to about 1.070 figuring 75% efficiency.
I use almost the same grain bill but .5lb C60. I dont like them too sweet.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 02:38 PM   #6
bobbrews
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Sierra, Nevada
Posts: 4,034
Liked 439 Times on 350 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by jeburgdo View Post
I have to disagree. There seems to be one big distinction in grain bills: how much malt/sweetness there is.
You can make a dry IIPA with very, very low malt sweetness. There are many commercial examples of this, and those examples are usually top rated whereas the sweeter examples are fall by the wayside.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeburgdo View Post
Compare beers with recipes that have been circulated like Pliny the Elder and G'Knight. Pliny is dry without "malty" grains or a lot sweet crystal malts, while G'Knight has a high amount of medium colored crystal, along with Munich. Pliny uses simple sugars to dry it out even further, G'Knight doesn't. And the taste is quite evident.
Not sure what you meant by this. Pliny is a dry Double IIPA, GKnight is more of a sweet Imperial Red. Green Flash WCIPA uses 15% cara malts, and it is quite dry. And many breweries use 4-12% Munich to create dry IPAs.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 05:53 PM   #7
FreshZ
 
FreshZ's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
St. Louis, MO
Posts: 334
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by jeburgdo
I don't know about "standard," but I've used this base a couple times with quite tasty results:

10lbs 2-row
2lbs Vienna
1lb Crystal 40 (or 60)

For 5 gallons, gets to about 1.070 figuring 75% efficiency.
This is perfect. If I were to use Munich, it replaces the Vienna? What is the difference? Color? Fermentables?
__________________
Primary: Nothing
Primary: Nothing
Secondary: MVP (Manly Vanilla Porter),
Bottled: Cali Common, I.P.K., CTZ SMaSH yeast experiment, FUBAR IPA, Barleywine, Columbus Day Milk Stout, Narwhal ESB...
On Deck: Domaine DuPage clone, Heady Topper clone, Oaked Imp. Stout

rammit Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 06:14 PM   #8
Jebu1788
Recipes 
 
Sep 2009
Posts: 440
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


You get similar flavors from both, but some differences. Here's a good (and brief) summary: http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/muni...a-malt-152405/

I bet a swap of 1 lb Munich and 1 lb 2-row for the 2 lbs Vienna would be pretty similar.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 06:25 PM   #9
bobbrews
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Sierra, Nevada
Posts: 4,034
Liked 439 Times on 350 Posts


The difference is flavor. Munich is more malty. For IPAs, I find the sweet spot to be about 4-8%. As a comparison, Vienna is said to provide more body, but less flavor. Color depends on the maltster and the grade of the product. The supplier should be able to tell you the Lovibond.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2012, 05:58 AM   #10
Brewitt
Senior Member
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
Brewitt's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Encinitas, CA
Posts: 861
Liked 79 Times on 69 Posts


IIPA
15 lbs 2row
1 lb caramel 20
0.75lb aromatic
1 lb carapilis
__________________
______________________________________
"Here's to brewers yeast, that humblest of all beasts
"
Adam Cole (aka cadamole) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6dzUOYTQtQ)

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump