Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Why use a starter?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2012, 05:06 PM   #1
caioz1jp
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: St. Clair Shores, Michigan
Posts: 166
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default Why use a starter?

Ok first of all I am at work so searching the forums is a bit tough. I have been brewing over a year now, about 10 batches, and have never made a starter. I use the Wyeast smack packs for everything. I have only had one beer, an apple ale with 1gal of cider, have trouble hitting the expected FG. I just tossed a pack of Muntons dry yeast into it. Everyone who has tasted my beers has loved them. Is there some secret Im missing out on? Besides lag periods, what are the benefits of a starter?


caioz1jp is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:21 PM   #2
mrrshotshot
Senior Member
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 7 reviews
 
mrrshotshot's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 650
Liked 44 Times on 40 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Typically, there isn't enough yeast in a standard vial or smack pack to ferment the Wort at optimum levels.

Starters help with lag phase.

The extra cells can help fight off any foreign cells that were potentially present in the Wort.

Starters ensure that the yeast is healthy and viable to begin with. Maybe one day you forget to check the expiration date on your yeast pack and accidently use old unhealthy yeast.

I'm sure there's more reasons, but these are my big ones.


mrrshotshot is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:31 PM   #3
stratslinger
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Terryville, CT
Posts: 2,294
Liked 171 Times on 146 Posts
Likes Given: 112

Default

The biggest reason is to shorten the lag period. During that lag period, while the yeast are reproducing, they're also generating byproducts that can introduce off flavors into your beer. Typically those get cleaned up if you give them enough time, but not always. Anyway, with a starter, you build up a large population of yeast before they ever hit the beer, so they spend less time reproducing, thus less lag, thus less byproducts to clean up.

Some side benefits, like mrrshotshot pointed out, are that the shorter lag time gives other nasties less time to take over within your wort, and also let you know that your yeast is indeed healthy before you pitch it into your fermenter.
stratslinger is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:34 PM   #4
Sulli
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 395
Liked 35 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 11

Default

Good info here.
Sulli is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 07:58 PM   #5
caioz1jp
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: St. Clair Shores, Michigan
Posts: 166
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default

You guys are awesome. I know this has been answered before but I really apreciate it.
caioz1jp is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 08:01 PM   #6
solbes
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ramsey & Akeley, Mn
Posts: 2,957
Liked 228 Times on 209 Posts
Likes Given: 127

Default

I'd just suggest trying a beer where you make a healthy starter, say 2-3L. Compare to beer direct pitch. Then you'll have your own evidence. I've done this a couple of times and come back to the starter.


__________________
Primary #1: Empty #2: Black IPA
Secondary #1
: Blackberry Rhubarb wine #2: RIS #3: Cab MerMarqeNac Wine
Kegged
: Pumpkin Ale, Pre-Prohibition Lager
Bottles
: Carmel Apple Cider, Big 50 Barleywine, Framboise Lambic, Barolo Wine, Berry Rhubarb Wine, Black Currant wine
On Deck: BGSA
solbes is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



Forum Jump