Is "Secondary" Actually Worth It? - Page 3 - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Is "Secondary" Actually Worth It?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2012, 05:50 PM   #21
KISS Brew
 
KISS Brew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Athens, Georgia
Posts: 546
Liked 54 Times on 35 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Misplaced_Canuck View Post
It's simple: Try the same recipe with a secondary, and without. See which one you think works best.

I do secondaries as a matter of habit and because it works for me.

My usual schedule (for ales) is 2 weeks primary, 2 (or more) weeks secondary. I've done some secondary-less batches with a 3 week primary and it worked just fine too.

MC
I like this answer the best. I've decided on no primary for me by trying both methods and being perfectly happy with both beers. I decided a secondary was unnecessary, but do what works best for you!
__________________
Fermenting / Conditioning:
Beyond the Pale Ale, Cut and Dry Stout

Bottled:
Hoptoberfest IPA, Oktoberfest Ale, Blonde Ale, Scottish Ale, Oatmeal Stout, Edwort's Apfelwein, Janet's Brown Ale, Irish Red Ale, Strawberry Wheat, ESB, Belgian Pale Ale

KISS Brew Homebrewing Blog

Most recent post: Beyond the Pale Ale Recipe

chmarkham Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 02:26 AM   #22
avidhomebrewer
Recipes 
 
Sep 2007
Posts: 2,553
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts


I haven't racked a beer to secondary in probably 3 or 4 years, and I brew 2x5 gallon batches each month. I really don't see a reason to rack beer to secondary any longer for a normal batch. Now, if you are making a fruit beer, like a lambic, then definitely rack.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 03:20 AM   #23
Markd27
 
Markd27's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2011
Allen, Tx
Posts: 468
Liked 48 Times on 32 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Monkey View Post
I never do secondary but wonder why most kit instructions call for it. If the trend is to leave the beer in the primary for a little longer prior to bottling/kegging, why haven't the kit makers followed this trend ?

ETA: I get most of my kits from Austin HomeBrew.
Most of the companies that sell the kits also sell secondary fermenters. Take that for what it's worth.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2012, 12:41 PM   #24
ceannt
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 753
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts


Friends don't let friends rack to secondary .....
__________________
Piping Pig Pub

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2012, 07:03 PM   #25
BrewMeABrew
Recipes 
 
Jun 2012
Posts: 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by avidhomebrewer
I haven't racked a beer to secondary in probably 3 or 4 years, and I brew 2x5 gallon batches each month. I really don't see a reason to rack beer to secondary any longer for a normal batch. Now, if you are making a fruit beer, like a lambic, then definitely rack.
Let me add beers with extra material in the boil that is not stained out, like a pumpkin ale. Secondary is helpful here as well to let things clear without leaving bottles half full of pumpkin. I racked off p primary and left behind a little more than a gallon due to a large amount of pumpkin in the boil.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2012, 09:42 PM   #26
ColumbusAmongus
Recipes 
 
Feb 2011
, MI
Posts: 178
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


I stopped doing secondaries a long time ago and pretty much just go 3 weeks in the primary. I don't care about clarity (even though my brews are clear) because I am not a pro brewer but I do care about quality and freshness and I feel like the average home brewer doesn't have the proper equipment to transfer beer from container to container without oxidizing it. I leave my beer in the primary pretty to avoid extra work but to mainly reduce oxidation post fermentation.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 03:35 PM   #27
zmad2000
Recipes 
 
Nov 2011
Rurtherford, New Jersey
Posts: 160
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts


I do secondaries sometimes. It depends on a few different things: type of beer, empty kegs, or if i want to brew another beer. Since i only have one primary fermentor and 3 glass 2ndry's i do it out of necessity.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 10:02 PM   #28
FuzzeWuzze
I Love DIY
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
FuzzeWuzze's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2012
Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 3,109
Liked 426 Times on 312 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by ColumbusAmongus View Post
I stopped doing secondaries a long time ago and pretty much just go 3 weeks in the primary. I don't care about clarity (even though my brews are clear) because I am not a pro brewer but I do care about quality and freshness and I feel like the average home brewer doesn't have the proper equipment to transfer beer from container to container without oxidizing it. I leave my beer in the primary pretty to avoid extra work but to mainly reduce oxidation post fermentation.
Because an auto siphon is too much work? Granted im not saying your wrong about leaving in the primary, but the transferring and oxidizing scare doesnt seem warranted.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 12:44 AM   #29
duckmanco
Recipes 
 
Sep 2010
VA
Posts: 703
Liked 22 Times on 22 Posts


No, no its not worth it.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 01:06 AM   #30
govner1
Kept Man!
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
govner1's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2012
Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,590
Liked 405 Times on 338 Posts


Absolutely worth it but it requires patience!
Some don't have it but it not only clarifies your beers, i.e., Brite Tank, but let's your yeast finish its job.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apricot Beer - Year in the "Secondary" - Would you Worry? Khanbo General Techniques 7 04-12-2012 01:53 AM
"faster" and "shorter" mash and sprarge beesy General Techniques 7 02-25-2010 06:24 PM
Is bottle conditioning as good as a "secondary"? BrewOnBoard General Techniques 13 08-26-2009 09:28 AM
Giant "starter" - worth washing the yeast? cactusgarrett General Techniques 3 02-05-2009 12:15 AM
A Good "Lagering" Temp for my "HefeLagerAle"? Evan! General Techniques 0 10-26-2006 08:25 PM


Forum Jump