Software to control brewing process - Page 2 - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Automated Brewing Forum > Software to control brewing process

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-20-2012, 10:03 PM   #11
carlisle_bob
Recipes 
 
Apr 2012
Carlisle, PA
Posts: 1,205
Liked 29 Times on 28 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by btbonser View Post
I'm in no rush, my local HBS has a complete, all manual, single tier HERMS system for $1500 (Keggels, pumps, valves chiller, etc.) that I am going to get. I am planning on taking this system and automating it as much as the budget (aka wife) will allow.

Say good bye to batch sparging in the Coleman Extreme
Hi

Spend some time understanding and working with the setup before you try to automate it....

Bob



 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 12:24 PM   #12
btbonser
Recipes 
 
Dec 2010
Jasper, Missouri
Posts: 45
Liked 6 Times on 1 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by carlisle_bob

Hi

Spend some time understanding and working with the setup before you try to automate it....

Bob
Good advice Bob! I brewed my first batch on Saturday and using the new setup left me thinking about many things.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 12:26 PM   #13
carlisle_bob
Recipes 
 
Apr 2012
Carlisle, PA
Posts: 1,205
Liked 29 Times on 28 Posts


Hi

If you are like most of us around here, a given configuration of "stuff" will last about six months before there's a "need to modify".

Bob

Rbeckett Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 01:02 PM   #14
Rbeckett
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Bronson, Fl
Posts: 995
Liked 70 Times on 49 Posts


CB,
six months? I havent been able to finish my system without modifying it already.... Seems every time I get close I find a glitch or hang up and when I address that I end up changing a component or sensor to eliminate the stumbling block completely. I think brew controls evolve over time... I would strongly recomend any new brewer building a control system to insure that you build a very robust base system with lots of room for expansion, because inevatably things will get changed, adjusted and improved over time. Mine sure has changed from where I originally started. Just a thought or two from a tinkerer builder.
Wheelchair Bob
__________________
What do you mean "no Kidneys"???, WTF now I gotta drink less beer...
Join the Automation sub forum in Electric brewing for a discussion of components and control systems. I did!!!!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 01:37 PM   #15
btbonser
Recipes 
 
Dec 2010
Jasper, Missouri
Posts: 45
Liked 6 Times on 1 Posts


So true! I think I spend as much time modifying and building new stuff as I do actually brewing, I'm never satisfied. But that's half the fun!!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 04:54 AM   #16
BrotherGrim
Recipes 
 
Jun 2012
, Mississippi
Posts: 346
Liked 70 Times on 49 Posts


You could try a phidget board. It is a simple usb IO system for PC. I have used them in the past with Visual Basic interfaces that work great and simple to do. You can even use a VB set in excel to really ramp up your control options. Much cheaper than a PLC.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 02:25 PM   #17
ruralbrew
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Strum, WI
Posts: 278
Liked 99 Times on 56 Posts


Is there a reason why it wouldn't be possible to control an SSR with the control signal through either a parallel or serial interface? Much like CNC systems use the same signals to control a driver board? Use a one wire interface for temperature monitoring and something as simple as a Bash or Perl script to control the temperature.

There has to be a reason it hasn't been done, but I can't think of one. Then again my thinker seems to be working slowly these days.
__________________

I may be ignorant but that doesn't stop me from having an opinion

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 07:16 PM   #18
carlisle_bob
Recipes 
 
Apr 2012
Carlisle, PA
Posts: 1,205
Liked 29 Times on 28 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by ruralbrew View Post
Is there a reason why it wouldn't be possible to control an SSR with the control signal through either a parallel or serial interface? Much like CNC systems use the same signals to control a driver board? Use a one wire interface for temperature monitoring and something as simple as a Bash or Perl script to control the temperature.

There has to be a reason it hasn't been done, but I can't think of one. Then again my thinker seems to be working slowly these days.
Hi

It's been done many a time.

The gotcha when running high power or fire is a system crash. Making a simple parallel port setup crash proof can be a bit of a pain. It can indeed be done, but it's not as easy as it looks at first.

Bob

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 05:42 AM   #19
helibrewer
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
helibrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2011
Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 3,707
Liked 299 Times on 254 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by carlisle_bob View Post
Hi

If you are like most of us around here, a given configuration of "stuff" will last about six months before there's a "need to modify".

Bob
Amen Brother!!!


__________________
Something is always fermenting....
"It's Bahl Hornin'"

Primary:
Brite Tank/Lagering:
Kegged: Sour Saison, Pale Ale, Aggie Ale, Firestone DBA, De Koninck Blonde
Bottled: Belgian Quad (Grand Reserve), Derangement (Belgian Dark Strong)
On Deck: Pliny the Younger

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump