Coldbreak Brewing HERMS Giveaway!

HomeBrewSupply AMCYL Brew Kettle Giveaway!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Disappearing Gravity
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2012, 07:57 PM   #1
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default Disappearing Gravity

Mash today gave me 6.25 gallons at 1.058 (1.041 @ 145F). Before pitching I had 5.0 gallons at 1.064 (1.062 @ 80F). I would have expected to get 1.072 (i.e. 58 x 6.25 / 5).

Is there a rational explanation for where the sugar is going? I'm as careful with the hydrometer as I can be, and getting the wort mixed well before sampling.


Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 08:04 PM   #2
neosapien
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 714
Liked 143 Times on 102 Posts
Likes Given: 395

Default

my bet is that the sugar never went anywhere. it was never there to begin with. from 1.058 -> 1.064 was just a matter of your boil-off. the fact that you expected to hit 1.072 means your efficiency was just not as high as expected. look to things like mash time/temp, grain mill size, etc. to improve that number. Also, as much as you mix the wort after you top off, it's still possible to find a non-homogenous region in it, so that may account for it as well.


neosapien is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 08:12 PM   #3
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

The 1.058 is after the mash, so mash time, grain mill size etc not a factor after that point. I had 77% mash efficiency , which I'm happy enough with.

I did forget to factor in loss to hop sludge, which I measured at a little over half a quart. Even calling that a whole quart would mean I should have gotten 1.069 (54 * 6.25 / 5.25). I leave nothing in the kettle...
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 08:26 PM   #4
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neosapien
my bet is that the sugar never went anywhere. it was never there to begin with. from 1.058 -> 1.064 was just a matter of your boil-off. the fact that you expected to hit 1.072 means your efficiency was just not as high as expected. look to things like mash time/temp, grain mill size, etc. to improve that number. Also, as much as you mix the wort after you top off, it's still possible to find a non-homogenous region in it, so that may account for it as well.
Sorry, I should have at least said thankyou for the response - was in a hurry to get out the door and to the pub.
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 08:29 PM   #5
ShinyBuddha
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 347
Liked 17 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

So you dump the cold break and the vegetative material from the hops into the fermenter? Why don't you use hop bags? Just curious. I make 6.5 gallon batches to end up with 5 gallon batches in the keg/bottles. I plan on loosing 1 gallon to the brew kettle (trub & cold break) and another .5 gallons to the fermenter (yeast & whatever else settles out).
ShinyBuddha is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 08:42 PM   #6
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShinyBuddha
So you dump the cold break and the vegetative material from the hops into the fermenter? Why don't you use hop bags? Just curious. I make 6.5 gallon batches to end up with 5 gallon batches in the keg/bottles. I plan on loosing 1 gallon to the brew kettle (trub & cold break) and another .5 gallons to the fermenter (yeast & whatever else settles out).
I read somewhere here that you get more flavour out of the hops if you let them roam free. I used to use hop bags and still got a fair amount of sludge. Now I just pour everything through muslin into a bottling bucket before racking to a carboy. I figure anything the muslin doesn't catch will end up in the trub at the bottom of the carboy after three weeks and be left behind before bottling.
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 08:43 PM   #7
neosapien
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 714
Liked 143 Times on 102 Posts
Likes Given: 395

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonraker View Post
Sorry, I should have at least said thankyou for the response - was in a hurry to get out the door and to the pub.
THAT is a worthy cause
neosapien is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 09:24 PM   #8
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UP of Michigan
Posts: 65,440
Liked 6053 Times on 4313 Posts
Likes Given: 1557

Default

Remember that any reading with wort above about 90 degrees is worthless- even with conversion tables/correction software it is notoriously accurate. So I would say the sample at 145 degrees is simply wrong.

Next time, cool the sample in a water/ice bath in a pitcher to under 90 degrees and then take the reading. At that point, it can be temperature corrected to an accurate reading.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

Follow me on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lorena.t.evans
But I'm pretty boring so don't expect much!
https://www.facebook.com/lorena.t.evans
Yooper is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 09:58 PM   #9
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
Remember that any reading with wort above about 90 degrees is worthless- even with conversion tables/correction software it is notoriously accurate. So I would say the sample at 145 degrees is simply wrong.

Next time, cool the sample in a water/ice bath in a pitcher to under 90 degrees and then take the reading. At that point, it can be temperature corrected to an accurate reading.
Ah, this I was not aware of. Excellent, thanks. My faith in physics may be restored.
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 10:12 PM   #10
neosapien
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 714
Liked 143 Times on 102 Posts
Likes Given: 395

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
Remember that any reading with wort above about 90 degrees is worthless- even with conversion tables/correction software it is notoriously accurate. So I would say the sample at 145 degrees is simply wrong.
Whoops! Totally missed that part of the OP. That'll teach me to talk without reading all the words!


neosapien is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what is the secreat to hitting a target starting gravity and final gravity? crookedibrews Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 10 03-05-2012 03:53 AM
The Disappearing Efficiency Dilemma rancidcrabtree Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 11-07-2011 03:33 PM
Fastest Disappearing First Batch smata67 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 08-19-2010 04:45 AM
quick question on 1st batch -- disappearing bubbles ksavitsk Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 03-18-2008 07:31 PM
Disappearing beer! trailmix Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 10-03-2005 12:42 AM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS