Is 2 vessel system basically no-sparge? - Page 4 - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Electric Brewing > Is 2 vessel system basically no-sparge?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2012, 12:10 AM   #31
Dgonza9
Recipes 
 
May 2010
Evanston, Illinois
Posts: 1,182
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby_M View Post
To me, what makes a process "no sparge" is the fact that your total derived preboil wort is derived from a single homogeneous runoff (I know BIAB wort isn't run off but the definition still holds).

A fly sparge has the lauter process where wort runs off at high concentration and slowly gets lower and lower.

A batch sparge has discrete runoffs with concentrations that start high and get lower and lower with each addition of sparge water and runoff. This counts if you run off twice or three times or more.

I don't care how many vessels you use, if you use a voile bag, etc.... if the wort is all the same gravity when it comes out of the tun, or when you remove the grain bag, it's a no sparge process.

The only benefit to holding a mash at a reduced liquid volume is so that you can protect against pH swings by keeping a reasonable buffer in less than optimal water chemistry.
I understand now. It's making me question my typical practice now that I have 3 vessels. I had been draining the mash tun to a separate vessel, then putting all my sparge water into the mash tun, then recirculating for about 20 minutes, then draining and boiling.

I might get better efficiency if I split the sparge water into to two batch sparges. Stirred and let each one sit for 15-20 minutes, etc.


__________________
On Tap: Belgian Barrel Aged Barleywine, Da Yooper's Oatmeal Stout, Breakfast Stout, Hop Your Face Off IIPA, Catcher in the Rye Saison, "Wino-head" Nelsin Sauvin Gumballhead.

Bourbon Barrel Duchesse De Bourgnone
Kegged:

Fermenting English Mild

on Deck: Lager?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 01:17 AM   #32
AnOldUR
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AnOldUR's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
, New Jersey
Posts: 6,886
Liked 844 Times on 609 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dgonza9 View Post
I might get better efficiency if I split the sparge water into to two batch sparges. Stirred and let each one sit for 15-20 minutes, etc.
Better efficiency, yes.

But better beer? You'll have to see for yourself.

If your recipes are calculated for the efficiency you now get, and you're making good beer, is it worth readjusting the recipe to save a couple of bucks in grain. But most important, will it make better beer?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 01:18 AM   #33
SmokingDog
Recipes 
 
Feb 2011
Sheboygan, WI
Posts: 126
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


@ Dgonza9: Yeah, Bobby has a great write-up on his personal blog on his take. Good reading. See the links below his signature.
__________________
"Get that damned Dog off my leg...!"

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 01:23 AM   #34
kjones
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
Upstate, SC
Posts: 253

Thanks sd, that clarifies for me. I just ordered a pump and I already have a temp. Controlled electric mlt and I use propane for boiling so I think I'm gonna put them together to build this.

My plan is to put the elec mlt on top and add my water to it then set my pid to dough in temp then at the end of the mash add "sparge" water to bk and set temp on mlt to 170 then recir until I reach the temp. Least that's my idea anyway, I hope that works and its correct

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 03:32 AM   #35
jpalarchio
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Holly, MI
Posts: 562
Liked 50 Times on 41 Posts


I'm in the process of going from a traditional 3-vessel system to a 2-vessel system.

The "what to call it" question has me stumped but I would have to say that in my opinion it is "no sparge".

I'm starting with my full volume of water and recirculating through a RIMS tube to maintain mash temp. If the liquid never leaves the loop and is just recirculating, I don't see how it's a "true sparge". In a fly sparge or batch sparge, the sparge water is added to the mash and then drained either slowly (fly) or all at once (batch). With a 2-vessel system, it never drains until the final transfer to the kettle.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 04:30 AM   #36
Dgonza9
Recipes 
 
May 2010
Evanston, Illinois
Posts: 1,182
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by AnOldUR View Post
Better efficiency, yes.

But better beer? You'll have to see for yourself.

If your recipes are calculated for the efficiency you now get, and you're making good beer, is it worth readjusting the recipe to save a couple of bucks in grain. But most important, will it make better beer?
Good point, there. I get low 72% or so with recirculating sparge. I'm going to do some experimenting now that I have three vessels. I've always made good beer no sparge, so you are absolutely right. The efficiency does bother me a bit, though.
__________________
On Tap: Belgian Barrel Aged Barleywine, Da Yooper's Oatmeal Stout, Breakfast Stout, Hop Your Face Off IIPA, Catcher in the Rye Saison, "Wino-head" Nelsin Sauvin Gumballhead.

Bourbon Barrel Duchesse De Bourgnone
Kegged:

Fermenting English Mild

on Deck: Lager?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 03:47 AM   #37
kjones
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
Upstate, SC
Posts: 253

I don't think the definition of the word sparge says that it has to be a totally separate process like everyone is arguing



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stovetop 110v single vessel system klyph Electric Brewing 45 09-04-2013 04:59 PM
40 Paces Brewery, Single Vessel e-BIAB howabouttheiris Electric Brewing 31 11-05-2012 10:05 PM
TheDom's Two Vessel RIMS Build TheDom Electric Brewing 36 04-28-2012 01:22 PM
A 3-Vessel 2-Tier 1-Pump E-RIMS for 30A Quaffer Electric Brewing 65 01-25-2012 12:02 AM
What to get for my third vessel? jwb96 Electric Brewing 2 11-10-2011 05:01 PM


Forum Jump