Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Brew Science > Infusion vs Step Mash
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-20-2012, 02:52 PM   #1
rinhaak
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 144
Likes Given: 1

Default Infusion vs Step Mash

Not sure if this thread would be better in the "All Grain Mash" section, but I thought I'd pick the brains of the scientists amongst us.

I'm brewing an all-grain tripel this weekend. I've only brewed about 5 or 6 all grain beers so far (a recent convert from extract), so I'm still a novice. However, for all of my earlier beers, I used a step mash. In BLAM, however, Stan suggests using a single infusion mash at 146° for Belgian ales. Why? What would this do? What's the advantages either way?


rinhaak is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 03:32 PM   #2
TyTanium
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,949
Liked 550 Times on 388 Posts
Likes Given: 418

Default

Mainly, fermentability of the wort. Belgians are typically quite dry.

Mashing lower favors beta amylase which favors maltose production, whereas mashing higher favors alpha amylase which makes more dextrins and longer-chain sugars that aren't as readily fermentable.


TyTanium is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 05:21 PM   #3
afr0byte
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,436
Liked 74 Times on 62 Posts
Likes Given: 49

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rinhaak View Post
Not sure if this thread would be better in the "All Grain Mash" section, but I thought I'd pick the brains of the scientists amongst us.

I'm brewing an all-grain tripel this weekend. I've only brewed about 5 or 6 all grain beers so far (a recent convert from extract), so I'm still a novice. However, for all of my earlier beers, I used a step mash. In BLAM, however, Stan suggests using a single infusion mash at 146° for Belgian ales. Why? What would this do? What's the advantages either way?
I don't believe he actually recommends that. If I remember correctly, he quotes someone stating that if you're doing a single infusion mash you should probably do it at 146 and not mash out at all. Anyways, the reason for the 146 temp is what Ty said.
afr0byte is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 02:57 AM   #4
rinhaak
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 144
Likes Given: 1

Default

On page 222, in the "What Works" section, he write: "Mash for attenuation. Use a single-infusion mash between 146 and 149° F or consider a step mash such as at Ommegang. However, remember there is a chance with highly modified malts that a step mash (the protein rest, specifically) may degrade proteins too much and can cause a loss of body and head. With beers that have some sugar in them, the danger is greater."
rinhaak is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 03:32 AM   #5
afr0byte
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,436
Liked 74 Times on 62 Posts
Likes Given: 49

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rinhaak View Post
On page 222, in the "What Works" section, he write: "Mash for attenuation. Use a single-infusion mash between 146 and 149° F or consider a step mash such as at Ommegang. However, remember there is a chance with highly modified malts that a step mash (the protein rest, specifically) may degrade proteins too much and can cause a loss of body and head. With beers that have some sugar in them, the danger is greater."
First, a step mash doesn't have to include a protein rest. I don't know if Ommegang does one or not. However, he's not saying that you shouldn't do a step mash for a Belgian-style beer, he's just saying that if you do a single infusion mash it should be in the 146-149 range. Obviously Ommegang, who produce great Belgian beers, successfully do a step mash.
afr0byte is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 03:59 AM   #6
rinhaak
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 144
Likes Given: 1

Default

True enough (and I've only ever used step before). it seemed, though, that he was favoring single infusion.

Regardless, which method do you think would produce a better tripel? A single mash at 146°, or a step?
rinhaak is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 04:14 AM   #7
afr0byte
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,436
Liked 74 Times on 62 Posts
Likes Given: 49

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rinhaak View Post
True enough (and I've only ever used step before). it seemed, though, that he was favoring single infusion.

Regardless, which method do you think would produce a better tripel? A single mash at 146°, or a step?
I can't really say, as I've always done single infusion mashes. If I remember BLAM correctly, the monks use a step mash, though.


afr0byte is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Step mashing and pH question. a_potter Brew Science 6 06-04-2011 01:59 AM
Step of building my water/ph? HOPCousin Brew Science 13 01-29-2011 10:52 PM
Changing Ph during a step mash brad451 Brew Science 1 01-12-2010 04:59 PM
Step Mash Conversion Sixbillionethans Brew Science 0 08-25-2009 02:17 AM
Why does a mash tend to settle at or near the right pH for mash enzymes Kaiser Brew Science 10 05-20-2009 02:38 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS