2ndary question - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > 2ndary question

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2012, 04:01 PM   #1
rstewy2
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Long Beach, CA
Posts: 120
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts



I was recently on a camping trip with my structural geology class and found a grad studemt who also homebrews. He has several years of experience on me, so I was excited to have him try one of my beers. I told hin to be brutally honest. He said he'd just tell me what I could do better.

After tasting it he pointed out some fruity flavors in my stout and said i should keep the fermentation temp down. He guessed that it was around 74 for this particular brew<upon checking at home, it was 74 the entire time.

Here's the real kicker. He said you definitely need to start using a secondary. He could tell just from taste that I only used a primary. I've been subscribing to the master's on here claim that a longer primary and a secondary have no difference in the final product in 5 gallon batches, but the fact thar he was able to pick this stuff out in a yaste while he had already had a few saison ipa's of his own has me questioning the validity of the claims here.

Just looking for input on whether this actually makes sense or if he was just messing with me, a noob.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 04:03 PM   #2
rstewy2
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Long Beach, CA
Posts: 120
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


If this belongs elsewhere, mods, please feel free to move it

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 07:52 PM   #3
dcp27
Recipes 
 
Jan 2010
Medford, MA
Posts: 4,125
Liked 125 Times on 121 Posts


did he give any reasons as to how he knew it was primary only?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 08:02 PM   #4
H-ost
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,746
Liked 72 Times on 53 Posts


I'm just guessing here but he could have just assumed you didn't use secondary and was correct. I find the more "old timers" I debate about secondary vs no secondary, the more I realize that people not using secondary pisses them off. They are all VERY adamant about using secondary and will not dare to try and not secondary no matter what they hear. The whole debate between using one and not is somewhat recent and so there is a pretty bold line in the sand between two schools of thought.

I have no idea what he could have tasted to tell that there was no secondary used, maybe the non-existent autolysis? Other than that, the main argument you hear for secondary is that it will make your beers clearer but there are many things you can do to affect that.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 08:04 PM   #5
Revvy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Revvy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2007
"Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 40,921
Liked 3184 Times on 1883 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by H-ost View Post
I'm just guessing here but he could have just assumed you didn't use secondary and was correct. I find the more "old timers" I debate about secondary vs no secondary, the more I realize that people not using secondary pisses them off. They are all VERY adamant about using secondary and will not dare to try and not secondary no matter what they hear. The whole debate between using one and not is somewhat recent and so there is a pretty bold line in the sand between two schools of thought.
Yup. Great answer. We see it on here.
__________________
Like my snazzy new avatar? Get Sons of Zymurgy swag, here, and brew with the best.

Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman

I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 08:52 PM   #6
johnp
Recipes 
 
Jun 2010
SD
Posts: 139
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


Next time do a secondary on half of your batch and see if he can tell the difference.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 09:48 PM   #7
rstewy2
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Long Beach, CA
Posts: 120
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Thanks for the answers. As I said, I'm definitely on board with the whole primary only idea. I just was completely confused as to how he basically broke down my entire fermentation process with only a taste.

Another thought I had was that, as it was a camping trip, the beer was submitted to significant jostling. He might have noticed more sediment or something.

I will definitely try the split batch. Based on my thread snooping, it seems like you'd make better beer without a secondary. There is more yeast to clean up after itself after all.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 10:35 PM   #8
neko
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Portland, OR
Posts: 570
Liked 18 Times on 16 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by rstewy2 View Post
Another thought I had was that, as it was a camping trip, the beer was submitted to significant jostling. He might have noticed more sediment or something.
There could be something to that. He might have tasted more sediment because of the jostling and then thought "If you had transferred to secondary then there wouldn't have been as much sediment". If he had tasted some brew that had been sitting in the fridge then he might have thought differently.
__________________
Ring ding dong. Ring a ding-ding-ding dong

"We have invented the world's largest laser system" -Ahnold

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2ndary fermentation galvipa General Techniques 4 02-19-2012 08:23 PM
coffee again. do i really need a 2ndary? eatria General Techniques 6 11-18-2007 03:07 PM
2ndary question? GABrewboy General Techniques 2 12-07-2006 04:27 PM
Primary to 2ndary help needed! wheela426 General Techniques 1 11-06-2006 10:30 PM
More time in 2ndary or bottles? captaineriv General Techniques 9 11-10-2005 12:05 AM


Forum Jump