Consequences of a very high evaporation rate and/or boil off - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > Consequences of a very high evaporation rate and/or boil off

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2012, 09:01 PM   #1
Geordan
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 243
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts



I recently assembled an "electrically assisted" 8 gallon kettle -- a 1500w element at full power, plus the stovetop burner at max result in a decent enough boil for my liking at 6+ gallons. I noted on its first run that the boil off was quite substantial: 1.5 gallons an hour (25% or so), versus the 13% of my smaller stainless kettle on the stovetop. I chalked this up to a more vigorous boil and larger kettle opening and went back to my life.

However, listening to an episode of Brew Strong last night, Jamil and Palmer both say quite emphatically that a boiloff/evaporation rate of higher than 15% will result in "bad things" in regards to melanoidan production. They say that "new brewers" (me) run with too vigorous a boil, and really just need a "gentle rolling boil" (paraphrasing). Taking this to heart, I'm running some tests, but it looks like I'm either at full power with stovetop and installed element and getting a decent boil at 1.5 gallons/hour evaporation rate, or I end up with a super wimpy 'boil' that doesn't seem like it will do much of anything.

Does anyone have any input on this subject? I tried searching but didn't see anything directly related to too high a boiloff rate resulting in negative effects on the wort.

NOTE: I have yet to actually brew in the kettle for a variety of reasons. All tests thusfar have been with water.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 12:10 AM   #2
Hammy71
Senior Member
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
Hammy71's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
, Maryland, The Tax Me State
Posts: 5,891
Liked 527 Times on 400 Posts


My system burns off a gallon every 1/2 hour. I've never noticed anything bad about my brews.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 05:23 AM   #3
photogscott
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
Long Beach CA
Posts: 189
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


As long as you're not boiling less than 60 minutes things will be fine

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 03:44 PM   #4
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,231
Liked 7732 Times on 5426 Posts


Boiling off 1-1.5 gallons in an hour isn't really excessive. If you start with 6.5 gallons, and end up with 5 gallons, that's not that bad. Also consider that it's not really a % of boil off, as if you had a taller pot (but the same width) and started with 15 gallons, you'd still only boil off 1.5 gallons per hour. Does that make sense? Start with more wort, and you reduce the % of boil off while the actual amount remains the same.

Is your kettle 8 gallons? If so, that's sort of small and that does limit you. You could try using Fermcap in the boil to prevent boilovers and using more wort at the beginning.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:53 PM   #5
Geordan
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 243
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts


Thanks for your input everyone. Yooper, I'm glad to hear you mention a constant boiloff rate versus a percentage -- up until this point I had thought about my boiloff in absolute values (.75g/hr, 1.5g/hr etc) until listening to Brew Strong and hearing Jamil and Palmer talk about percentage.

To answer your question, the kettle is 8 gallons, which when I bought it seemed huge, and as I contemplate moving from 2.5 to 5 gallon batches starts looking smaller and smaller... I will definitely look at Fermcap. Would you mind expanding on the "using more wort at the beginning" statement? I'm not sure I grasp what you mean.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 02:02 PM   #6
Misplaced_Canuck
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Misplaced_Canuck's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
NE Columbia SC - Formerly, Montreal Canada
Posts: 2,884
Liked 166 Times on 134 Posts


I boil off about 2.75 gallons per hour. No problems here. I don't boil "real hard" either. Just a gentle rolling boil.

MC
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misplaced_Canuck
Carbonic bite? Is that like the bubonic plague?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebstauffer
Needless to say after more than a few drams my mental efficiency matched my mashing efficiency.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 02:09 PM   #7
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,231
Liked 7732 Times on 5426 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Geordan View Post
Thanks for your input everyone. Yooper, I'm glad to hear you mention a constant boiloff rate versus a percentage -- up until this point I had thought about my boiloff in absolute values (.75g/hr, 1.5g/hr etc) until listening to Brew Strong and hearing Jamil and Palmer talk about percentage.

To answer your question, the kettle is 8 gallons, which when I bought it seemed huge, and as I contemplate moving from 2.5 to 5 gallon batches starts looking smaller and smaller... I will definitely look at Fermcap. Would you mind expanding on the "using more wort at the beginning" statement? I'm not sure I grasp what you mean.
When you mash and sparge, if you start with more wort you'll end up with more wort. That's all I meant. If your batches end up with too little wort (4.5 gallons), start with .5 gallons more in the boil kettle by sparging another .5 gallons. That works will all but the smallest grain bills. A taller pot would help, since you're going to be limited to 6.5-6.75 gallon boils with an 8 gallon pot.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 02:54 PM   #8
Geordan
Recipes 
 
Dec 2011
Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 243
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts


Got it Yooper! I think I was just overcomplicating the statement in my head Makes sense now. I'm hoping to build a nicer and larger electric BK in the near future and relegate the existing 8 gallon to an HLT.

Misplaced_Canuck, thanks for the input -- glad to know it's not an issue for you either!

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculating Boil Off Rate johnodon Equipment/Sanitation 14 02-21-2014 02:09 AM
Boil-off rate mrfocus Equipment/Sanitation 17 04-16-2012 09:03 PM
Keggle evaporation rate bmickey Equipment/Sanitation 5 05-18-2011 09:39 PM
What is your boil off rate? AnOldUR Equipment/Sanitation 12 03-05-2011 12:31 AM
Boil kettle and boil off rate question jfkriege Equipment/Sanitation 4 12-11-2009 07:02 PM


Forum Jump