Coldbreak Brewing HERMS Giveaway!

HomeBrewSupply AMCYL Brew Kettle Giveaway!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > First "No Sparge"...why haven't I done this before?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2012, 02:22 AM   #1
Newton
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 264
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default First "No Sparge"...why haven't I done this before?

I was feeling extra lazy today, so I did a "no sparge" instead of my typical batch sparge. I've been leary of trying this because my mash tun is only 36 quarts. I had 11 lbs of grain and I filled the cooler to the brim with about 7.5 gallons of water. I collected about 6.25 gallons in one runnings and got an efficiency of 68%. My usual batch sparge efficiency is 75%, so this wasn't too bad. My 5.25 gallon batch was about 1.052 OG...which is about the max for my little mash tun...but 70% of the beers I brew have an OG around this level. Might have to do this more often.


Newton is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 03:09 AM   #2
bbrim
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 836
Liked 35 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

I have also started doing this. I especially like it for low gravity beers where I have had issues with tannin extraction. An added bonus is the amount of time it trims off the brew day.


bbrim is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 04:43 AM   #3
XpeedeeX
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 34
Default

This is a tactic that some breweries use because the first runnings of the mash are of the highest gravity. What you leave behind is small amounts of extract that are stuck between the grains.
XpeedeeX is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 05:31 AM   #4
kable
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 105
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newton
I was feeling extra lazy today, so I did a "no sparge" instead of my typical batch sparge. I've been leary of trying this because my mash tun is only 36 quarts. I had 11 lbs of grain and I filled the cooler to the brim with about 7.5 gallons of water. I collected about 6.25 gallons in one runnings and got an efficiency of 68%. My usual batch sparge efficiency is 75%, so this wasn't too bad. My 5.25 gallon batch was about 1.052 OG...which is about the max for my little mash tun...but 70% of the beers I brew have an OG around this level. Might have to do this more often.
Now take your lazy to the next level.

Ditch the mash tun and drop your grains into a large bag and mash in your boil pot.

With beers lower than 1.055 I get about 85% efficiency and just have to rinse out the bag.
kable is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2012, 05:26 AM   #5
DanaDana
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dracut, MA
Posts: 109
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I was hesitant to try the no sparge method. If you are getting only a small drop in efficiency, I might have to give it a whirl. I wonder how big the drop would be if you're doing 10 or 12 gallon batches.
DanaDana is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2012, 04:41 PM   #6
Palefire
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 1,130
Liked 12 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kable View Post
Now take your lazy to the next level.

Ditch the mash tun and drop your grains into a large bag and mash in your boil pot.

With beers lower than 1.055 I get about 85% efficiency and just have to rinse out the bag.

This. About as easy as it gets. In 10 years I predict that 90% of homebrewers will be doing BIAB.
Palefire is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2012, 04:55 PM   #7
ayoungrad
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,102
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I get 75% extraction efficiency with 2 batch sparges with BIAB.

I am doing my first no sparge for my next batch. I had been assuming about 50% efficiency based on refractometer measurements from prior batches.

How are you guys getting 85% efficiency with no sparge?
ayoungrad is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 02:31 AM   #8
bbrim
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 836
Liked 35 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

I get 62-65% efficiency on no sparge batches.
bbrim is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 03:43 AM   #9
frod1963
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arlington, VT
Posts: 211
Liked 14 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 10

Default

I get 62% eff with a 15 gallon blichmann with false bottom doing no sparge. I love this method for session beers and have been just manually recirculating until the end of the mash.
frod1963 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 03:47 AM   #10
Reelale
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,736
Liked 1374 Times on 1332 Posts
Likes Given: 55

Default

62% average here too. Keggle mash tun with a false bottom and bottom drain. Oh, and a RIMS. I've had one batch at 67%. I've never brewed any other way.


Reelale is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
English "sparge" method Patstarr777 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 44 04-04-2011 03:07 PM
Can I sparge "from the bottom up"? GearJammer All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 10 02-10-2010 02:30 PM
"5.2" in the sparge water AZ_IPA All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 25 09-16-2009 07:39 PM
First "True" PM How long does it take to batch sparge? the_wickster All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 4 10-22-2007 07:35 PM
"No Sparge method" Dark_Ale All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 6 06-10-2006 08:17 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS