Efficiency debacle - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Efficiency debacle

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2012, 03:21 PM   #1
SONICYOUTH
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
ARLINGTON, VA
Posts: 76


I brewed an IPA last night with the following:

10# Pale 2-row
4# Muntons
1# 10L
.5# 20L
.125# Carapils

I mashed it for 60 minutes at about 156-158 and then recirculated the first runnings. I sparged with about 5 gallons of water to collect 6 gallons of wort. It should have come out to an efficiency of above 1.07 but I only got it to 1.054. I've even gone as far to get a grain mill to mash my grains better than at the store. WHAT IS GOING ON

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 03:36 PM   #2
Gfei
Recipes 
 
Aug 2009
Richmond VA
Posts: 229
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


Looks like you got an efficiency of 50% ish. I would look at the crush from the mill (did you adjust the rollers?)

Another thing would be to make sure you are stirring the mash really well.

If you're getting a poor crush or not stirring enough your efficiency will suck.
__________________
Chris
Damn Yankee Brewing

|Bar Build|

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:00 PM   #3
SONICYOUTH
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
ARLINGTON, VA
Posts: 76

I did adjust the rollers but how small is too small for the crush? I felt like I was getting either flour or what I got. I stirred plenty well so I'm pretty sure that is not the problem.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:01 PM   #4
gingerdawg
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Posts: 410
Liked 42 Times on 31 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by SONICYOUTH View Post
I brewed an IPA last night with the following:

10# Pale 2-row
4# Muntons
1# 10L
.5# 20L
.125# Carapils

I mashed it for 60 minutes at about 156-158 and then recirculated the first runnings. I sparged with about 5 gallons of water to collect 6 gallons of wort. It should have come out to an efficiency of above 1.07 but I only got it to 1.054. I've even gone as far to get a grain mill to mash my grains better than at the store. WHAT IS GOING ON
So you collected only 1 gallon from the mash and 5 from the sparge? Sounds like a really thick mash. Temperature could come down a couple of degrees, too.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:05 PM   #5
SONICYOUTH
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
ARLINGTON, VA
Posts: 76

How much should I be collecting from the initial mash then?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:20 PM   #6
librewer
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Selden, NY
Posts: 84
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


If you do a batch sparge.... everything from the initial mash. Was the mash tun completely drained? How many gallons did you mash with?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:23 PM   #7
SONICYOUTH
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
ARLINGTON, VA
Posts: 76

I mashed with about 4-5 gallons of water. How much should I be getting BEFORE I sparge?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:44 PM   #8
Piratwolf
 
Piratwolf's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Va Beach, VA
Posts: 2,118
Liked 128 Times on 119 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by librewer View Post
If you do a batch sparge.... everything from the initial mash.
This is not my understanding of batch sparge nor my practice.

When you mash in, you want somewhere between 1.25-2 quarts of mash water per pound of grain. I aim for 1.4qt. In your case, you're looking at ~22 quarts or 5.5 gallons of strike water (initial infusion).

After your mash time expires, you drain the 1st runnings and add the sparge water you've been heating while you wait. Grain absorbs somewhere around .12-.15 gal of water/pound (in your recipe, about 2.4 gallons), so you should get about 3-3.25 gallons first runnings.

If you want to start your boil with 6 gallons, it's simple math from here. 6 gallons pre-boil (goal) - 3.25 1st runnings = 2.75 gallons needed. Since the grain is pretty much full of water, you don't need to worry about absorbtion. Sparge volume is 2.75 gallons... let it sit 10 mins or so while the 1st runnings heat, then drain until you have your 6 gallons pre-boil volume.

The sparge/2nd runnings rinses a lot of sugar that was left behind by the original mash. Should help your efficiency a LOT!
__________________
Piratwolf: "I've heard that Belgian Blondes can be "panty droppers" but they're not particularly high IBU nor cheap."

jmendez29: Haha! I get it! :ban:
Wait. You're not talking about beer, right?
You're talking about beer. That could have been a whole lot more fun.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:45 PM   #9
librewer
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Selden, NY
Posts: 84
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


If you add 4.5 gal to the mash, that is about a 1.5 qt/lb. ratio. The grain will absorb about 1.4 to 1.5 gal leaving you with about 3 gal from the initial mash (first runnings) excluding any loss from dead space in the mash tun.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 04:48 PM   #10
SONICYOUTH
Recipes 
 
Oct 2011
ARLINGTON, VA
Posts: 76

Aha. It sounds like I've been collecting too little from the first draining of my mash and sparging a bit too much. Gracias.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do people report mash efficiency or brewhouse efficiency? thisoneguy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 66 07-25-2012 05:37 AM
Troegs Hopback amber ale debacle cwheel All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 7 08-26-2011 04:26 PM
Increassing efficiency or making up for low efficiency mcarb All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 20 01-12-2011 04:29 PM
109% efficiency? alcibiades All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 10 12-26-2009 04:10 PM
Please help solve 1st All-Grain debacle mangine77 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 18 12-04-2008 06:42 PM


Forum Jump