Whirlpool, worth it? - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Techniques > Whirlpool, worth it?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2012, 03:03 PM   #1
tlazaroff
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Fairfax, VA
Posts: 56


Hi all.
My question is in regards to utilizing a whirlpool. I never have. I just accepted any hop particles into the fermenter, as well as hot break material, etc and RDWHAHB'ed it up. I have never had a problem with the final product, my beer has always good. I have found that any break/hop material just falls out of suspension after fermentation. Is there any reason that I should consider utilizing a whirlpool at all?
__________________

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 03:09 PM   #2
Lucky_Chicken
 
Lucky_Chicken's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Bloomfield, IA
Posts: 795
Liked 37 Times on 27 Posts


I just started, it is nice! The benefit i see for not having it in the bottom of the fermenter is I have less fermenter loss, thus more beer!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 03:18 PM   #3
ArcaneXor
 
ArcaneXor's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
Posts: 4,572
Liked 117 Times on 104 Posts


I don't see much benefit in terms of clarity on my system, but I really like the character whirlpool hop additions lend to a beer. I usually start recirculating the wort through my pump and plate chiller with about 10 minutes left in the boil and let it go for another 10 minutes post-boil before turning on the cold water to chill the wort.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 05:40 PM   #4
tlazaroff
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Fairfax, VA
Posts: 56

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcaneXor View Post
I really like the character whirlpool hop additions lend to a beer.
Is there a difference between a Flame Out and Whirlpool addition of hops? Besides stirring the wort, it's basically the same, no?
__________________

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 05:43 PM   #5
ArcaneXor
 
ArcaneXor's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
Posts: 4,572
Liked 117 Times on 104 Posts


Well, traditional flame-out additions imply relatively rapid cooling shortly after the addition, whereas whirlpooling implies hot steeping for an extended time, but I suppose there is some overlap. Hot steeping seems to create a more intense flavor/aroma and a smooth bitterness.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 05:45 PM   #6
brushvalleybrewer
 
brushvalleybrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2010
Centre Hall, Pennsylvania
Posts: 82
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


After chilling, I've started stirring up a whirlpool and leting the wort sit for 20 minute to get all of the break material to settle out away from the dip tube and have noticed significantly better clarity and easier transfer.

I think the other thing people talk about as an advantage is that if you are doing the whirlpool using a recirculation pump during immersion chilling, then you get better heat transfer and it chills faster.
__________________
In a humble log cabin off an unregarded back road, somewhere, deep in the heart of Pennsylvanias hill country, we find our intrepid hero the Brush Valley Brewer.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whirlpool w lid on? logdrum General Techniques 3 12-01-2011 02:22 PM
Do you whirlpool hot? strat_thru_marshall General Techniques 16 03-01-2011 09:38 PM
Why whirlpool? beerisgood General Techniques 8 10-23-2010 03:54 AM
Whirlpool IC HELP!!! strat_thru_marshall General Techniques 8 07-24-2010 08:28 PM
Whirlpool and DMS Suicided1954 General Techniques 8 04-23-2010 04:30 PM


Forum Jump