Accurate FG - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Accurate FG

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-29-2007, 09:35 PM   #1
AnOldUR
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AnOldUR's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
, New Jersey
Posts: 6,888
Liked 847 Times on 612 Posts



After bottling this afternoon I remembered to check the FG. I used what was left in the bottom of the secondary. Even though this was the secondary, there was a fair amount of sediment in the sample I used. Will this have an effect on the accuracy or the measurement?

Just finishing a Pilsner thatís only about four weeks old. (Had to check the carbonation before moving to basement for conditioning.) Itís gonna be REAL hard to stay out of this stuff.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 10:12 PM   #2
Rook
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
Rook's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2007
Bothell, WA
Posts: 381
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


I asked a similar question earlier, and I think that becuase the yeast is in suspension, and not solution, it won't effect the reading.
__________________
Rook

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 10:19 PM   #3
tbulger
Recipes 
 
Jan 2007
MA, NH
Posts: 406
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Considering you put the priming sugar in the bucket prior to the reading that may effect the reading (maybe not by much).

EDIT: nope you took it out of the secondary... should be accurate
__________________
primaries: BRown Ale
secondaries: Rye IPA
Bottled: IPA, Pigs ear brown clone, stovepipe porter, German Alt, Oktober fest ale, Smoked IPA, failed pale ale, 1st AG ESB, belgian wit, Ipa#2, , Lake wheat, fish Red ale, Smoked wheat,
KEGS: blonde Nugs , Sugar pale light, chin nook ale (gone in 1 week)

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 10:50 PM   #4
AnOldUR
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AnOldUR's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
, New Jersey
Posts: 6,888
Liked 847 Times on 612 Posts


Yeah, there was no priming sugar, straight from the secondary. It just looks really thick, so I thought that it might have an effect. Actually kind of hoping it did because it's at 1.018, but it started at 1.062, and there was no activity, so I should be fine. Sure tasted good!

It will be the next beer I drink tonight. When I moved it to the secondary there was not enough room, so I bottled one. It's been a couple of weeks and I'm feeling brave . . . .

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How accurate is Beersmith? exbrit Brewing Software 11 10-02-2009 02:06 PM
Most accurate brewing software Blindguardian Brewing Software 17 05-28-2009 01:48 PM
Pool kits accurate enough? GilaMinumBeer Equipment/Sanitation 5 05-22-2009 03:11 AM
How do I get accurate hydrometer readings? chrispykid Extract Brewing 2 02-18-2009 11:00 PM
How Accurate? FishinDave07 Brewing Software 1 04-24-2008 12:14 PM


Forum Jump