Wort Chiller Material - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > Wort Chiller Material

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2011, 10:28 PM   #1
plbrown44
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 10
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts



Stainless vs. Copper?

Ready, set, discuss.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 10:32 PM   #2
phidelt1499
Recipes 
 
Nov 2010
Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 207
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


In terms of thermodynamic potential for heat exchange... I doubt one could tell the difference on the homebrewing scale.

What can you get for less $$$? If you can get copper for less than you can get stainless, I'd say get the copper and use the saved cash to get nicer SS ball valves or something like that.

Bling might also be a factor, if everything else you have is SS, might as well go that route if you want everything to look the same.

What kind of wort chiller are you intending on building? Immersion, CFC, other?

FWIW, I have a counterflow chiller with a 3/8 copper tube inside a garden hose. Works great for me.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 05:40 AM   #3
plbrown44
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 10
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


At this point I'm looking at immersion chillers. Could easily go and buy one from the local hombrew store but thought this was easy enough of a DIY project. I'll have to check on tubing pricing as well.

Copper is a better conductor so I'll probably go that route as I don't have the "bling" that would warrant SS.

Read an interesting article in a recent BYO mag discussing the science behind chiller efficiency. Probably will go 50' copper and try and coil it myself.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 06:33 AM   #4
JuanMoore
 
JuanMoore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
The Old Pueblo
Posts: 21,986
Liked 3693 Times on 3514 Posts


SS is shiny and can be cleaned with caustic cleaners. Copper is cheaper and easier to bend/cut/solder/etc. Even though copper is a better conductor, the heat transfer is about the same in this situation, primarily because the SS tubing typically used has thinner walls. IMO if you plan on using caustic cleaners (CIP) or want to pay extra for the "bling factor", go with SS, otherwise go with copper.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 03:44 PM   #5
rcrabb22
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
rcrabb22's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
Illinois
Posts: 714
Liked 23 Times on 16 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by plbrown44 View Post
At this point I'm looking at immersion chillers. Could easily go and buy one from the local hombrew store but thought this was easy enough of a DIY project. I'll have to check on tubing pricing as well.

Copper is a better conductor so I'll probably go that route as I don't have the "bling" that would warrant SS.

Read an interesting article in a recent BYO mag discussing the science behind chiller efficiency. Probably will go 50' copper and try and coil it myself.
SS is more rigid and difficult to coil. Forget about making sharp bends easily. If this a DIY project, copper is the way to go.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 08:23 PM   #6
outside92129
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
outside92129's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Apr 2011
Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,224
Liked 63 Times on 51 Posts


SS coil is a b*tch to coil on your own. Go copper. Cheaper too.

http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_12605_SPM2673663502P

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 01:34 AM   #7
Lost
Recipes 
 
Aug 2005
Tampa, FL
Posts: 606
Liked 7 Times on 6 Posts


What is the fascination with SS? I have brass ball valves, a copper coil, and some aluminum kettles. I haven't died yet.

Copper is cheaper, easier to work with, has better thermal properties,.and is a yeast nutrient to boot.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 11:58 AM   #8
SankePankey
 
SankePankey's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2009
Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 905
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts


Any way you cut it, 50 feet of 3/8" stainless tubing is not adequate for 15 gallons. More than an hour of stirring with 60 degree chill water.

Retired as a herms coil and starter chiller. Gone plate instead.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 12:55 PM   #9
Lost
Recipes 
 
Aug 2005
Tampa, FL
Posts: 606
Liked 7 Times on 6 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by SankePankey
Any way you cut it, 50 feet of 3/8" stainless tubing is not adequate for 15 gallons. More than an hour of stirring with 60 degree chill water.

Retired as a herms coil and starter chiller. Gone plate instead.
It takes me less time than that (not much though) with 10 gal batches and 80 deg ground water. Have you tried recirculating, and using a prechiller or pumping ice water through it?

Edit: that time was without much stirring.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 01:20 PM   #10
SankePankey
 
SankePankey's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2009
Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 905
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts


Retired. I did my best. Now with my recirculating plate chill, I get about 20 mins or so to pitch. Except that it's just about the worst idea in the world filtering wise requiring several filter steps (hop spider, etc.) but it sure is neat to see the degrees tick off like seconds. And my whole volume is cooled from the go like the IC does.

It works great as a herms coil and starter chiller though.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump