Attenuation too high? - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Attenuation too high?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2011, 11:33 PM   #1
Hitokiri
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Seattle, WA
Posts: 64
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts



Last weekend I bottled my second batch of beer and my FG was lower than expected. I used Wyeast 1332 and had an OG of 1.051 and an FG of 1.009. According to my calculations this is 82.3% attenuation and the listed average on the Wyeast site is 67-71% for this strain.

Here is my recipe:

4 Gallon batch
4.54 lbs DME (2 lbs @60 min, 2.54 lbs @15 min)
Amarillo Hops @ 10.4%
.5oz @60
.5oz @20
1oz @5
1oz Dry hop

Wyeast 1332 pitched at 65*. Fermented at 68* and left in the primary for 3 weeks.

Should I be worried about such a high attenuation rate (wild yeasties)?

Thanks!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2011, 11:47 PM   #2
Rushis
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Pasadena, CA
Posts: 289
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


Average attenuation, is just that, an average. Like most living organisms, yeast don't care about statistics

Wyeast 1332 (or WLP005) are beasts so they could attenuate quite well if the conditions are right.

Did you correct for temperature on the FG reading?

Either way not something to be worried about as long as it tastes good.

mrk305 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 05:22 AM   #3
Hitokiri
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Seattle, WA
Posts: 64
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


Thanks. I'm pretty sure it will be fine as well but just thought that was a bit far above the average. This was the first time I used this particular 5 gallon carboy. I think I'll give it a couple days in pbw before using it again just to be sure.

The yeast definitely had a good time in there it seemed and it was a good thing I used a blow off tube. Can't wait to taste the fruits of their their (our) efforts.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 05:43 AM   #4
shafferpilot
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
shafferpilot's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2007
Cincinnati OH
Posts: 1,579
Liked 20 Times on 19 Posts


Three ways (of many) to DECREASE attenuation. First mash at higher temp... doesn't apply to you since you use extract. Two, ferment at slightly lower than ideal temp so the yeast poop out a little earlier. And three, use yeast with lower attenuation.
__________________
A great man knows that he knows NOTHING

doomXsaloon Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 08:42 AM   #5
Clementine
Recipes 
 
May 2011
Waynesboro, PA
Posts: 545
Liked 12 Times on 12 Posts


you did not taste at bottling? I'm always drinking the hydrometer jar, half just because I'm curious and the other half to make sure all is well. What temp did you ferment @

Clem

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 05:14 PM   #6
Hitokiri
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Seattle, WA
Posts: 64
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


I did drink my FG sample and though I am new to tasting young beer, I'm pretty optimistic that this will be a good one. I pitched at 65* and it fermented between 65* and 68*. Sat in the Primary for 3 weeks before bottling.

To Shaffer's point of using a less attenuative (is that a word?) yeast, I certainly didn't expect to get 10% higher than the Wyeast listed average. Whether this turns out to be positive for this specific beer or not, we shall see. But as an extract brewer without much temp control (swamp cooling), would it make more sense to add more non-fermentable steeped grains than to rely on stated yeast strain attenuation rates?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 08:00 PM   #7
pohldogg
Recipes 
 
Apr 2011
louisville, KY
Posts: 287
Liked 32 Times on 18 Posts


You also pitched a good amount of yeast. The smack packs are designed for 5 gal of 1.060 and you pitched into 4 gal of 1.051. It's not quite mrmalty numbers, but with a fresh pack it was a solid pitch that would help with attenuation.

I'd try a few more batches before looking to add too many unfermentables. If you're consistently getting higher attenuation numbers then go for it, but I'd rather have a beer too dry than too sweet or syrupy. Go slow and maybe try carapils to add body and if you really need sweetness then try crystal. Crystal malt can make a beer cloying real quick imo.

doomXsaloon Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2011, 06:48 PM   #8
Marlowefire
Recipes 
 
Aug 2011
Dahlonega, Ga
Posts: 235
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


I plug those gravity numbers into daves dreaded calculator an get an attenuation of 64.5%. How do you get 80 something percent? Am I using the wrong calculator?!?!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2011, 07:08 PM   #9
Beezy
Recipes 
 
Mar 2011
Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,390
Liked 22 Times on 19 Posts


Heh the beer I just bottled for down to 1.004. Poop happens I guess. They ways seem to attenuate high for me. I usually mash at 153 too. Maybe the themometer is off now that I think about it.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2011, 05:58 PM   #10
dcp27
Recipes 
 
Jan 2010
Medford, MA
Posts: 4,125
Liked 125 Times on 121 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlowefire View Post
I plug those gravity numbers into daves dreaded calculator an get an attenuation of 64.5%. How do you get 80 something percent? Am I using the wrong calculator?!?!
well somethings wrong, cuz its def more than 64.5%. (1-9/51)*100 = 82.4%

maybe that was real attenutation vs apparent

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Attenuation with US-05 carp Fermentation & Yeast 26 05-02-2014 05:25 AM
Very high attenuation with WLP002 bolts Fermentation & Yeast 16 06-07-2011 12:36 PM
Need Advice - High Attenuation & Low FG 1.002 Vintage63 Fermentation & Yeast 9 02-14-2011 12:40 AM
S-04 and Way too high attenuation RichBenn Fermentation & Yeast 22 11-04-2010 02:53 AM
High FG and poor attenuation brelic Fermentation & Yeast 2 01-21-2010 07:29 PM


Forum Jump