Stainless Steel Wort Chiller? - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > Stainless Steel Wort Chiller?

Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2007, 03:29 AM   #1
Feb 2007
Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 134

I just saw this on ebay. Has anyone ever tried a stainless steel wort chiller? I would think copper would still be a bit better. Thoughts?
Sam's Choice Hard Cider
Secondary: Empty
Conditioning: Nothing

Drinking: Nothing !

Past brews: Big River Brown Ale, Yooper Chick's Dead Guy Clone

"The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible." - Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 03:29 AM   #2
Jan 2006
Lincoln, NE
Posts: 851
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

I would think copper would have a much better heat transfer rate.

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 03:52 AM   #3
Erbium:YAG's Avatar
Aug 2006
New Jersey
Posts: 426
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts

Stainless steel is actually terrible for heat transfer when compared to copper. That's why good stainless steel cookware is clad with aluminum and/or copper.
24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case, coincidence?
-- Stephen Wright

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 04:39 AM   #4
Dec 2005
San Diego
Posts: 848
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts

So how about aluminum tubing? hmmm, aluminum heater core out of a junk car? A copper heater core would pobably be lead solder. Ohhh . transmission oil coolers? Earls Supply?
So far, I've had more experience thinking than I've had don't think they are mutually exclusive, do you?

72 batches so far,
48 wine, mostly Loquat, peach, plum, prickly pear
23 beers and ciders
1 sauerkraut
1 Tequila, from a prickly pear wine experiment that didn't work. I call it "Prickly Heat"

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 12:20 PM   #5
Apr 2006
Buda, TX
Posts: 442
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts

Use that heater core out of the junk car as a pre-chiller for your immersion wort chiller. I'm not going to talk about how hot it is in Texas because it seems that now everywhere is hotter than all get out but our tap water here in the dead of summer is not what I'd call cool. Last summer I used a pre-chiller and it worked great.

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 12:47 PM   #6
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Jul 2006
Posts: 14,290
Liked 809 Times on 513 Posts

Copper is indeed more efficient, but there's nothing wrong with using stainless - it'll get the job done. For the price, I say go for it.
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 01:36 PM   #7
Ale's What Cures You!
Yooper's Avatar
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,550
Liked 7917 Times on 5542 Posts

So, are you bidding on this? If you aren't, I might consider it. I would prefer copper, but this sure is cheaper as long as the price stays about where it is.

But, I'm not bidding against you. So, if you're not bidding, let me know!
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 02:45 PM   #8
Mar 2007
Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 43

Originally Posted by Nexus555
I just saw this on ebay. Has anyone ever tried a stainless steel wort chiller? I would think copper would still be a bit better. Thoughts?
You might want to see what there is for copper chillers on ebay - if you are patient you can get a deal. I just got one (a couple of weeks ago) from ebay for $47.00, including shipping and handling, and it works really good. I just decided on how much I wanted to spend and kept trying until I found one where no one outbid me. It only took a couple of weeks - the copper ones are showing up all the time. Since the stainless steel chiller is already at almost $35, I'm guessing that when the bidding is over, it won't be much cheaper than a copper one that works better. But if you don't want to wait, go for it!

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 04:01 PM   #9
Feb 2007
Posts: 64
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

copper~231 Btu/hr-ft-deg. F

aluminum~145 Btu/hr-ft-deg. F

stainless~9.3 Btu/hr-ft-deg. F

Translation - Copper removes energy from the wort about 25 times faster than stainless and 1.6 times faster than aluminum

Now because of the other means of heat transfer going on this doesn't mean that it'll take you over 12 hours to cool the wort if you can do it in half an hour using a copper chiller but it would cool much quicker, which is always best. After all, a copper cooler is only about $20 more than the selling price here

Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2007, 04:46 PM   #10
Will work for beer
Dude's Avatar
Jan 2005
Knob Noster, Missouri
Posts: 8,770
Liked 87 Times on 70 Posts

Honestly, I'm not a huge fan of the design of that stainless chiller either. The coils will be too far down into the wort. The majority of the heat stays near the top, so you want the beef of the coils elevated slightly. You are going to lose even more cooling capacity with just the design of that.
On Tap: Lake Walk Pale Ale -- Eternity (Raspberry Stout) -- Nutrocker -- Donnybrook Dark
Primary: Lake Walk Pale Ale
Secondary: Summit IPA
Up Next: Smoked Porter -- Pub Ale -- Watermelon Wheat
Gone But Not Forgotten:

Reply With Quote
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stainless Steel Wort Chiller? irunxcjm General Techniques 38 01-08-2014 12:42 PM
Anyone use the Stainless Steel Wort Chiller? TwoHeadsBrewing Equipment/Sanitation 13 10-03-2011 08:12 PM
looking for some 1/4" stainless steel tubing for chiller thewurzel Chillers & Stir Plates 13 08-10-2009 01:26 AM
stainless steel immersion chiller? wester101 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 06-27-2009 11:02 PM

Forum Jump