Wyeast 1450 - Denny's Fave Experiences? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Wyeast 1450 - Denny's Fave Experiences?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-12-2011, 04:40 PM   #1
Strave19
Recipes 
 
May 2010
WA
Posts: 140
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts



Hi Everyone

I just brewed an amber ale yesterday and used 1450 for the first time, I was aiming for something mac and jack's-ish. I had a year old smack pack that I stepped up in a starter from 300ml to 600ml, then couldn't brew for a month, so put it in the fridge. A few days ago I decanted and added about 200ml of 1.040 wort to get it going, pitched last night and it took off within 12hrs! Fat 1.5" Krauzen. I'm never going to worry about old smackpacks or leaving starters in the fridge again...

What have been your experiences with this yeast? Is it estery at all or clean? Problems at higher temps? I'm fermenting at about 68-70 right now. Hopefully its not too hot, its at the high end for this yeast. I'm hoping it will have full mouthfeel, maybe slight esters, and reasonably well attenuated 1.060 to 1.013?

Cheers

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 04:46 PM   #2
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,201
Liked 7705 Times on 5414 Posts


This is my go-to strain! It's not estery at all, but I've never fermented it above 67 degrees or so. It's really "clean" and allows the malt and hops both to shine, without being underattenuative. I really love it in all of my American style beers, and it was really great in my oatmeal stout as well.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 04:47 PM   #3
dale1038
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
Louisville, KY
Posts: 428
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts


I think it's nice and clean even at higher temps. I don't get a lot of esters from it. There is a nice chunky mouthfeel to it though. I've used it 3 times, most recently with an oatmeal stout I have on tap. Give it a good month for that mouthfeel to kick in.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 04:51 PM   #4
bierhaus15
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
, New York
Posts: 1,565
Liked 131 Times on 81 Posts


I had two bad batches due to this yeast. They fermented fine (65-68F) with large starters but both batches refused to flocculate even with near freezing cold crashes and the malt profile was really weird tasting. It really muddled up the hop flavors quite a bit. I haven't used that yeast since.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 05:04 PM   #5
SwampassJ
Recipes 
 
Mar 2010
Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 2,163
Liked 37 Times on 34 Posts


Didn't attenuate as much as I hoped (both batches stopped at .020) but they tasted good, very big mouthfeel but not sweet tasting. Was very clean too.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 06:07 PM   #6
norsk
Recipes 
 
Dec 2010
San Simeon, CA
Posts: 526
Liked 50 Times on 37 Posts


It's a great yeast...which I don't use often enough.
__________________
veteransforpeace.org


VALHALLA BREWERY

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 10:20 PM   #7
weremichael
Recipes 
 
Feb 2006
Posts: 259
Liked 17 Times on 12 Posts


I too found it to not attenuate as well as my go to strain (Pacman #1764). It also doesn't flocculate well enough for me. I am sure that it works well, but not for my recipes. I have always been a fan of a fair amount (12-18%) of carastan, melanoidin, caramunich, brown malt, light chocolate etc. (obviously not in the same beer), I guess that is why Pacman works better for me. I think grain bill and to a lesser extent hop addition is a necessary factor when considering this particular yeast strain.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2011, 04:06 PM   #8
Strave19
Recipes 
 
May 2010
WA
Posts: 140
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Thanks for the feedback. Looks to be mixed opinions.

Im in no hurry so the flocculation issue doesn't concern me. We'll see how it goes.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2011, 06:34 PM   #9
greenbirds
Recipes 
 
May 2008
Posts: 463
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts


For the most part I like the flavor profile that this strain imparts. Pretty neutral and lets the malt take center stage. It is an average attenuator. The times I've used it, it tends to chug along for a long time before reaching final gravity. It is also not a great flocculator and needs some fining or extended cold aging to clear it up.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 11:19 AM   #10
SankePankey
Recipes 
 
Dec 2009
Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 905
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts


+1 for most of what was said. I just finished 4 ferments w/ the Denny's Fav. It doesn't attenuate as much as other yeasts and leaves a mouth filling sweetness which was great for Denny's west coast style RyeIPA. I wouldn't use it for beers you're going for a more dry mouthfeel. It also doesn't flocculate well until about 5 weeks after fermentation, then it flocculates quite well and leaves a very clear beer. This is w/ crash cooling too.

I would have issues using this yeast in a commercial setting, but it was fun and tasty. Not going on my all time fav's list though.

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wyeast 3789PC - Experiences? AmandaK Fermentation & Yeast 1 03-13-2011 10:02 PM
Looking for Wyeast 1450 in CANADA giligson Fermentation & Yeast 6 02-10-2011 12:12 PM
experiences with wyeast 1007 (german ale) JBmadtown Fermentation & Yeast 3 08-02-2010 02:14 PM
Denny's 1450 at 68? swiggarsbrewery Fermentation & Yeast 4 06-01-2010 08:45 PM
Denny's Sub 62F magnj Fermentation & Yeast 2 01-13-2010 03:21 PM


Forum Jump