Is 70% really that bad? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > Is 70% really that bad?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2011, 08:37 PM   #1
Tuggy
Recipes 
 
Feb 2011
Rockford, IL
Posts: 51
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts



I've been working with my current set up to get the best efficiency. My best has been 76% and my worst has been 68%.

My typical mash step includes single infusion with 2 seperate batch sparges (due to the fact that I have a 5gallon mast tun).

Any recommandations to boost this a little or to keep it out of the 60's?

My very last brew (last night) was 70%. Which in the grand scheme of things is basically .3% alcohol content... Not a big deal.

The grain mill that I use is a general that the LHBS offers to it's customers. The brew master there says it's efficiency is estimated at 75%.

Do you think that it would be better to run the grain through the mill twice or would that break it up too much?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 08:43 PM   #2
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
Thiensville, Wisconsin
Posts: 8,201
Liked 486 Times on 375 Posts


try buying grain from brewmasterswarehouse and see what your efficiency is


__________________
Quote:
The man who intoxicates himself on bad whisky is sometimes moved to kill his wife and set his house on fire, but the victim of applejack is capable of blowing up a whole town with dynamite and of reciting original poetry to every surviving inhabitant.

– "A Wicked Beverage," New York Times, April 10, 1894

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 08:43 PM   #3
Burgs
Recipes 
 
Feb 2010
Decatur, IL
Posts: 937
Liked 12 Times on 10 Posts


Is it really that bad? I say no, who cares.

IMO, it's more important to have a general idea of what kinda efficiency you're getting with your system (which, it sounds like you do) & account for that and shoot for consistent results, rather than just pursuing an arbitrary number.
__________________
No Hunks Brewing Collective

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 08:48 PM   #4
bruin_ale
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Campbell, CA
Posts: 1,436
Liked 21 Times on 21 Posts


70% isn't that bad.. if you get consistency that's what's most important. Could you do better with a finer crush? Yes, probably.. but how much extra grain per batch is that really, a lb or two?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 08:51 PM   #5
mattmcl
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
mattmcl's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Erie, CO
Posts: 731
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts


Ditto. But, what temp are you sparging at? I heat my sparge water to 185F before adding to the MLT. I picked up almost 10% when I started doing that.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 08:54 PM   #6
Pivovar_Koucky
Recipes 
 
Feb 2010
Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 404
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts


If you don't think it's bad than it's not bad

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 09:58 PM   #7
Catt22
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Posts: 4,998
Liked 69 Times on 62 Posts


IMO, 70% or so when batch sparging is not bad at all, especially since it appears to be an honest number. Beware of exaggerated efficiency claims and don't let them bug you. I get about the same when I batch sparge, which is only rarely when making starter wort to can. You are doing just fine and chasing higher efficiency numbers isn't worth the trouble. Use a couple of more pounds of malt, or whatever it takes, and brew on. Consistency is the important thing and if you overshoot your target a little, you get more beer or a higher gravity beer. How bad can that be? IMO, there are way more important brewing things to focus on.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 10:00 PM   #8
noggins
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Sep 2010
San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 783
Liked 122 Times on 85 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by motobrewer View Post
try buying grain from brewmasterswarehouse and see what your efficiency is

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 10:06 PM   #9
Malticulous
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
St. George Utah
Posts: 4,143
Liked 72 Times on 57 Posts


The finished product is what maters. With low efficiency you may end up oversparging and get astringency from tannins. If it tastes good to you it's good enough.

Batch sparging can hit efficiencies over 90% with a good crush, proper pH, good stiring and complete draining...honestly.

Kia covered this better than anyone else.
http://braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php...ing_Efficiency
__________________
Everything is better with a beer.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 10:13 PM   #10
Catt22
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Posts: 4,998
Liked 69 Times on 62 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Malticulous View Post
Batch sparging can hit efficiencies over 90% with a good crush, proper pH, good stiring and complete draining.
The only way I would be convinced of 90% efficiency for a batch sparge would be if I personally did the required measurements and calculations.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump