1.25 qt/lb or 1.5 qt/lb?? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > 1.25 qt/lb or 1.5 qt/lb??
Cool Brewing Giveaway - Supporting Membership Drive & Discount

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2011, 11:55 PM   #1
flabyboy
Recipes 
 
Dec 2010
Dover, MN
Posts: 940
Liked 13 Times on 13 Posts



How does the water to grain ratio in the mash affect the end product? Why do 1.25 vs 1.75 qt/lb or vice versa?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:02 AM   #2
Frodo
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Reno, NV
Posts: 1,033
Liked 28 Times on 27 Posts


I use a lower amount, closer to 1.25 qt/lb. I do it this way for a couple reasons: 1) I can add more boiling water if my mash temp starts falling without the mash getting too thin, 2) I add a mash-out infusion of boiling temp water, and if the original mash ratio is on the lower end my mash-out volume can be lower, then I'm left with being able to use more water for sparging so I get a better rinse of the grains.

EDIT: I don't know if the ratio really affects the end product. Logistically the way I do it helps me get a better efficiency because I can rinse with more sparge water than using that in the mash/mashout. Hope that makes sense...

Second EDIT: I guess if it wasn't obvious I use a cooler MLT, so can't direct fire the MLT to keep the mash temp stable, or to perform the mash-out.



Reason: clarify use of a cooler MLT

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:05 AM   #3
Nateo
Recipes 
 
Jul 2010
Bennett Springs, MO
Posts: 2,050
Liked 39 Times on 30 Posts


If you're interested in the nuts and bolts of mash science, a book like Noonan's New Brewing Lager would be a good place to start.

This is also an interesting read:
http://braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php...fusion_mashing

Noonan says that in thinner mashes, enzymes will be denatured more quickly than in thick mashes. This is a concern when trying to make very dextrinous worts, like for Scottish-style beers.

Noonan says that thinner mashes promote more fermentability, but the experiment on braukaiser indicates little relationship between thickness and fermentability, with a stronger correlation between mash temperature and fermentability.
__________________
To paraphrase Dr. England - "Off-flavors smooth with time. So do mountains. Brew it right from the start!"

My blogsite: http://nateobrew.blogspot.com/

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:42 AM   #4
schweaty
Doe Re Mi Beer
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
schweaty's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
Glass City
Posts: 1,803
Liked 44 Times on 20 Posts


I think the grain to water ratio is very dependant on your brewery. If you have a HERMS system where you constantly recirculate your mash you might want more water. Personally, I prefer the 1.50 qts/per pound as it agrees with my system. On the other hand, if you find yourself adding a lot of water to get to mash temp then go with the 1.25 qts/per pound. In the end I don't think it makes that big of a difference

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:45 AM   #5
r2eng
Recipes 
 
Mar 2008
Eagle, Idaho, Idaho
Posts: 1,432
Liked 32 Times on 28 Posts


I have actually experimented lately with 1.25 and 1.5, and the only difference I have found is higher efficiency with 1.5. Both beers finished the same and taste the same. I mash at 1.5.

The relationship between temp and fermentability is easy to see, but I find no relationship between mash thickness and fermentablity.
__________________
Engineer, Animator, Brewer.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 01:02 AM   #6
sco999
Recipes 
 
Sep 2010
North of Nowhere
Posts: 48

I also agree with the previous replies. When I started brewing all grain I mashed at 1.25qt/lb. I have recently switched to 1.5qt/lb because it works better with my system (better recirculation, and it allows me to single batch sparge on most beers). I have noticed no difference in taste or fermentability. Go with what works best for you system.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 01:12 AM   #7
Northcalais40
Recipes 
 
Jul 2010
south of hardwick
Posts: 425
Liked 7 Times on 6 Posts


I vary my ratio according to the grain bill to allow me enough sparge water,but not too much. With 15 lbs of grain, you don't get much sparge water at 1.5 qts/lb.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 12:37 AM   #8
Sean
 
Sean's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2006
Sandhills of NC
Posts: 1,174
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Northcalais40 View Post
I vary my ratio according to the grain bill to allow me enough sparge water,but not too much. With 15 lbs of grain, you don't get much sparge water at 1.5 qts/lb.
sounds like you need a bigger pot!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 12:56 AM   #9
Judge
Recipes 
 
Aug 2009
San Antonio, TX
Posts: 45
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


I split the difference and use 1.33. Seems to work well for me.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 01:08 AM   #10
Sean
 
Sean's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2006
Sandhills of NC
Posts: 1,174
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts


.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump