Austin Homebrew Supply Greenbelt v. WLP001 - The experiment begins... - Page 10 - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Austin Homebrew Supply Greenbelt v. WLP001 - The experiment begins...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-17-2011, 07:00 PM   #91
AZ_IPA
PKU
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AZ_IPA's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
The Cold Part of AZ
Posts: 52,665
Liked 8713 Times on 7001 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by KoedBrew View Post
AZ what did the judges say?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearRich View Post
The people need to know, AZ!
see below!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2011, 10:52 PM   #92
NuclearRich
Recipes 
 
Mar 2010
Hamden, CT
Posts: 1,113
Liked 118 Times on 100 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ_IPA View Post
Other commentors in this post have given some good impressions of the differences...
Blind taste testers that are BJCP certified are much better judges than someone who knows which one was brewed with a different yeast. If they didn't really indicate any major differences, I have a hard time believing there is one.
Not to knock the yeast, I am sure it is great, but I don't order from AHS, and was thinking of doing so just for that yeast. No sense in that for me unless it makes a difference.
__________________
Kegged - English Mild
Bottled - 30th birthday barleywine, caramel gingerbread quad, Caramel Quad/RUMCAKE, Lemongrass Diastasis, 2014 "lambic", eisbock, IIPA, oaked lite, Conan cider
Primary - nadda
Aging - 2015 "lambic", barleywine, wild cider, applejack

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 01:15 AM   #93
AZ_IPA
PKU
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AZ_IPA's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
The Cold Part of AZ
Posts: 52,665
Liked 8713 Times on 7001 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearRich View Post
Blind taste testers that are BJCP certified are much better judges than someone who knows which one was brewed with a different yeast. If they didn't really indicate any major differences, I have a hard time believing there is one.
Not to knock the yeast, I am sure it is great, but I don't order from AHS, and was thinking of doing so just for that yeast. No sense in that for me unless it makes a difference.
I'll post the scores and comments from the certified judge

Greenbelt: 32

Aroma: Floral hop boquet, some sweet malt, grassy. Some yeast esters as it warms/settles (9)

Appearance: Muddly light brown, thich white head with excellent retention (1)

Flavor: Sharp hop bitterness, malt sweetness behind with a touch of crystal/caramel (15)

Mouthfeel: Medium body, highly carbonated, lingering astringency (3)

Overall: Base recipe has decent IPA character with perhaps a touch too much crystal. There is a lingering harshness which escapes explanation, possibly some grain flavors? (7)

WLP001: 39

Aroma: Sweet, midly floral, light hops (8)

Appearance: Hazy amber, thick head, good retention (3)

Flavor: Grapefruit, light malt, a touch sour, hint of metallic, finishes with a nice balance (16)

Mouthfeel: Medium-light body, highly carbonated, a little creamy (4)

Overall: Nice clean IPA, hops are sharp, sugars balance reasonably well by are not very notable. Quite a citrus-fest (8)



So - In this case, this judge preferred the beer made with WLP001.....

Reason: Found the yeast info!!!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 03:17 AM   #94
Montanaandy
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
Montana
Posts: 1,013
Liked 19 Times on 14 Posts


I brewed an IPA with Greenbelt shortly after it was released (I had an order with Austin and thought "why not"). I will have to review my notes to make certain, but my present recollection is that the results were good but not great and that I preferred 1056 or 1272 or definitely PacMan to Greenbelt. As another member mentioned, Greenbelt seemed to mute the hops somewhat and I always go heavy on the hops in my IPA/IIPA's.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 02:34 PM   #95
bh10
 
bh10's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
In the brewery, USA
Posts: 715
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts


I kind of did the same experiment, but with Greenbelt vs. 1272. I brewed 7 gallons and split it, both have been on the yeast cake for about 1.5 weeks now. Ill make a thread in about a month, about the two and the results.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 06:26 PM   #96
AZ_IPA
PKU
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AZ_IPA's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
The Cold Part of AZ
Posts: 52,665
Liked 8713 Times on 7001 Posts


The comp organizer got back with me, and provided me the info I needed.

In this case WLP001 wins!

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wlp001 beerjunky828 Fermentation & Yeast 14 06-01-2013 02:03 PM
WLP001 94% attenuation? warnk Fermentation & Yeast 7 10-15-2010 01:59 PM
WLP001 vs. US-05 AviatorTroy Fermentation & Yeast 22 06-27-2010 07:10 PM
wlp001 or nottingham bullinachinashop Fermentation & Yeast 24 03-17-2010 09:13 PM
Is S-05 really WLP001? CharlosCarlies Fermentation & Yeast 15 12-16-2009 07:39 PM


Forum Jump