Tinseth vs Rager - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > Tinseth vs Rager
Cool Brewing Giveaway - Supporting Membership Drive & Discount

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-07-2010, 01:29 PM   #1


I'm curious at what prompted you to use one or the other for Hops calculations? I have been using Rager, but I keep finding my bitterness is always less than I perceive in commercial beer with the same ibus. I switched to Tinseth and it feels (tastes) more consistent. Not a real problem revisiting my old recipes as I just expect the bitterness to calculate low now.

What are you using & why?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 09:45 PM   #2
AnOldUR
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AnOldUR's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
, New Jersey
Posts: 6,869
Liked 842 Times on 607 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedasleeve View Post
What are you using & why?
Tinseth, because it was the default setting in Beersmith.

Bumped this because it'd interesting to hear if others have the same perception as Steve.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 07:13 AM   #3

I use Rager. I had 3 beers in the past that had lab analysis. And while those recipes didn't have perfect notes (exact volumes of water weren't properly noted) for me to input them into BeerSmith, when I did input my best estimate on them, Rager was closest to the actual lab analysis.
__________________
HOMEBREWING SINCE 1997

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 01:14 PM   #4
AnOldUR
fer-men-TAY-shuhn
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
AnOldUR's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
, New Jersey
Posts: 6,869
Liked 842 Times on 607 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by MattHollingsworth View Post
I had 3 beers in the past that had lab analysis. . . Rager was closest to the actual lab analysis.
I had always just trusted the default (Tinseth) in Beersmith, never giving it a second thought. Reading your post made me question this, so I tried switching a couple of recent batches between Tinseth and Rager. Strangely one came out higher and one lower. Probably because one (the APA) emphasized late additions.

Was this the case with the beer you had tested or did your hop schedules produce a consistent raise or fall when switching methods?

IIPA
90 minutes__________Start Boil
60 minutes__________1.5 oz Columbus
30 minutes__________2.0 oz Cascade
15 minutes__________2.0 oz Cascade
5 minutes___________2.0 oz Cascade
0 minutes___________Flame-out
Dry________________2.0 oz Cascade
Tinseth-87 IBU_____Rager-100 IBU

APA
75 minutes__________Start Boil
40 minutes__________.25 oz Chinook
___________________.75 oz Williamette
30 minutes__________.25 oz Chinook
___________________.75 oz Williamette
20 minutes__________.25 oz Chinook
___________________.75 oz Williamette
10 minutes__________.25 oz Chinook
___________________.75 oz Williamette
0 minutes___________.25 oz Chinook
___________________.75 oz Williamette
Dry________________.25 oz Chinook
___________________.75 oz Williamette
Tinseth-45 IBU______Rager- 39 IBU

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 01:14 PM   #5
Brew-boy
 
Brew-boy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2006
Lapeer, Michigan
Posts: 2,273
Liked 15 Times on 12 Posts


I used to use Rager and always felt it was off for my brew house. After listening to Tinseth on Brew Strong podcast I have switched over and I am much happier now with the beers.
__________________
Next:Smoked Pilsner.
Primary:Belgian Red, American Stout w/Roeselare
On Tap:Pale Ale, English Bitter
Aging: Imperial Oatmeal Stout on Vanilla beans.

I rather owe you a dollar than cheat you out of it.."Dad"

http://lapeerareabrewers.com/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LapeerAreaBrewers/

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 01:17 PM   #6
Hoppocrates
Recipes 
 
May 2010
Coralville, IA
Posts: 93

Sierra Nevada recommends Tinseth per BYO article on Torpedo a while back...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 01:33 PM   #7

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnOldUR View Post
I had always just trusted the default (Tinseth) in Beersmith, never giving it a second thought. Reading your post made me question this, so I tried switching a couple of recent batches between Tinseth and Rager. Strangely one came out higher and one lower. Probably because one (the APA) emphasized late additions.

Was this the case with the beer you had tested or did your hop schedules produce a consistent raise or fall when switching methods?
Dunno, sorry. I'd have to take a look and I don't have the time at the moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brew-boy View Post
I used to use Rager and always felt it was off for my brew house. After listening to Tinseth on Brew Strong podcast I have switched over and I am much happier now with the beers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoppocrates View Post
Sierra Nevada recommends Tinseth per BYO article on Torpedo a while back...
You guys have me giving this a second thought. SN has their own lab, so if they're recommending it, perhaps it's worth trying it out for a bit and see what I think.
__________________
HOMEBREWING SINCE 1997

 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 01:40 PM   #8

Rager, b/c the majority of recipes listed in magazines, etc. use that. I had Tenseth as my BeerSmith default, then changed it. Seemed to give me more consistency. It's easy enough to switch back & forth if you find one recipe uses a different formula. And that's all it is is a formula. One is no better than the other and none will match each individual brewhouse.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump