What happened to my efficiency? - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > What happened to my efficiency?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2010, 01:42 PM   #1
Photopilot
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Oceanside, CA
Posts: 1,116
Liked 103 Times on 76 Posts



I brewed last an AHB Doppelbock on Saturday. I have had the AG kit sitting around for a while maybe 5 months pre-crushed and in the sealed bag. I have been waiting that long to get the courage up to lager.

So I followed my normal routine which usually gets me in the high 70s for efficiency. The predicted OG was supposed to be 1.088. During my initial runoff I had a reading of 20 on my refractometer so I knew I was in trouble. I fly sparge and when I had about 5 gallons in the brew pot I read took a reading and was still getting about 13 brix so I just kept sparging, since I was still getting sugar. I ended up with about 8.5 gallons in the 1.060 range.

I was showing a friend who was an extract brewer my AG setup and techniques. At this point I suggested he go home to finish his own projects as I was in for a long day. I spent a half hour or so cleaning while skimming hot break, took an hour nap on the couch near the kitchen. When the wort was at 7 gallons I added the hops and started my hour boil.

After a very long day I had 5.5 gallons of 1.088 wort in a carboy, so it all worked out perfectly but why was the mash slow to release its sugary goodness?

My guesses:
  1. Older grain
  2. Improper sparge temp for smaller batch (5 gallon vs normal 10 gallon)

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:17 PM   #2
samc
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
Portland OR
Posts: 5,387
Liked 62 Times on 58 Posts


Different grains then you are used to using I presume. Sparge temps, you did not mention what they were.

Nap, you can actually take a nap while brewing? Doubt I could ever be that relaxed to do so.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:30 PM   #3
Scimmia
Recipes 
 
Oct 2007
QCA, Iowa
Posts: 959
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts


Have you done a strong beer before? You will generally get lower efficiency with a larger grainbill.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:56 PM   #4
JuanMoore
 
JuanMoore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
The Old Pueblo
Posts: 21,907
Liked 3683 Times on 3505 Posts


Probably not the sparge temp, as it has very little effect on efficiency.
http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f36/cold...sparge-110856/

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 04:53 PM   #5
Photopilot
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Oceanside, CA
Posts: 1,116
Liked 103 Times on 76 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by samc View Post
Nap, you can actually take a nap while brewing? Doubt I could ever be that relaxed to do so.
I had to work late the night before, and was on call till even later. Then a family pet decided I should get up at 6am, nap was easy. Also I was figuring on a 3 hour + boil, didn't make sense to stare at a boiling pot while fatigued that long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by samc View Post
Different grains then you are used to using I presume. Sparge temps, you did not mention what they were.
I was definitely using diff grains from my usual. I almost exclusively brew with Western 2-row as my primary grain but this had mostly Munich with some Pilsner 2-row.

Most of my beers are big beers but this is my biggest AG yet. It was about .015 bigger than average.

I think sparge temp had a factor in it. I use a sparge arm and it looses quite a bit of heat. I was still getting decent efficiency before, but was probably sparging too low. I had finally stepped up the temp to get the desired temp in the grain bed. Maybe the extra head space in the 5 gallon batch and the further drop from the sparge arm caused more heat loss.

One issue that seems strange though is my first runnings were low. I am used to the first runnings exceeded the expected OG and the last runnings to be low. Together they should add up to the OG (minus boil off) when you have the pot filled with your preboil amount.

It is not like i did not get my target OG I just had to sparge more than I would have liked, and boiled longer than I would have liked.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 05:06 PM   #6
Photopilot
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Oceanside, CA
Posts: 1,116
Liked 103 Times on 76 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by JuanMoore View Post
Probably not the sparge temp, as it has very little effect on efficiency.
http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f36/cold...sparge-110856/
So maybe sparge temps is not it but reading that thread i got a possible answer. Smaller grain bed, possible channeling and too fast draining leading to low efficiency in my 10 gallon MLT. I had done a few 5 gallon batches when I first started AG with this MLT, but my last 4 batches in which I have been dialing in the system were all 10 gallons.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 01:09 AM   #7
JuanMoore
 
JuanMoore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
The Old Pueblo
Posts: 21,907
Liked 3683 Times on 3505 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Photopilot View Post
So maybe sparge temps is not it but reading that thread i got a possible answer. Smaller grain bed, possible channeling and too fast draining leading to low efficiency in my 10 gallon MLT. I had done a few 5 gallon batches when I first started AG with this MLT, but my last 4 batches in which I have been dialing in the system were all 10 gallons.
Yep, the height to width ratio of the grain bed is an important factor when fly sparging. The added distance the water was dropping from the arm may have caused it to impact the grain bed harder and contributed to channeling as well. I don't know a lot about the specifics because I'm a batch sparger.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 02:26 AM   #8
Beerbuck
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Montreal
Posts: 170
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts


Did u said you were suposse to get 1.088 and you got it? Then whats the problem?? Having such a high gravity like this and reached it is for me, a succes.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 07:00 AM   #9
Photopilot
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Oceanside, CA
Posts: 1,116
Liked 103 Times on 76 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerbuck View Post
Did u said you were suposse to get 1.088 and you got it? Then whats the problem?? Having such a high gravity like this and reached it is for me, a succes.
I agree it was a successful brew day. I just hope to not have to have 3+ hour boils in the future to make my day a success. 2 batch days are a long ways off if each batch is going to take me 8 hours.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2010, 12:54 PM   #10
johndeere
Recipes 
 
Jan 2010
Ohio
Posts: 51

I would also think using older crushed grains that sat for months would make up for small amount of efficiency loss. 5 months is long time to me, though. I'm on edge if I have a crushed bag sitting for 5 days.

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
calculating efficiency vs brewhouse efficiency inchrisin General Beer Discussion 1 01-25-2010 12:50 AM
What happened? Fishin-Jay Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 12 12-19-2009 05:22 AM
what happened when i ran out of CO2? sjlammer Bottling/Kegging 7 07-31-2009 07:07 PM
What happened to? Sherpa FE General Chit Chat 0 01-09-2009 03:38 PM
What Happened? fa1321tx All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 11 08-14-2007 07:06 PM


Forum Jump