Higher OG than expected - 1.152 - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Higher OG than expected - 1.152

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-03-2010, 03:32 PM   #1
rpatton
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Orange County, CA
Posts: 41


Hello,
Last night I made a double IPA kit:

12 lbs ultralight extract
1 oz Glacier (bittering)
1 oz Centennial (flavoring)
1 oz Sterling (aroma)
1 oz Centennial (dry hop secondary)

The expected OG from the kit was 1.082. I came up with 1.152. Quite a surprise. I did a partial boil, 2 gallons. Perhaps that affected the OG? I took my sample from the wort, not from the fermenter. Any thoughts on if that caused the high OG, or what else could have?

Thanks!
Rob



 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 03:33 PM   #2
krelin
Recipes 
 
May 2010
San Diego
Posts: 48
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Did you measure with water added or not?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 03:35 PM   #3
Tlylebrew
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
Posts: 216

I would say the wort did not get completely mixed.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 03:36 PM   #4
TipsyDragon
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
California
Posts: 2,607
Liked 24 Times on 22 Posts


first off did you top off to 5 gallons before you took a reading? next did you pull the sample from the bottom or top of the brew pot?

taking a gravity reading from a 2 gallon wort when it should be 5 gallons will give you a false high reading. also extract has the tendency to want to sit on the bottom of the brew pot. if you took a sample from the bottom of the pot it will give you a false high reading.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 03:37 PM   #5
weirdboy
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Los Angeles
Posts: 8,162
Liked 481 Times on 389 Posts


You took a sample from 2 gallons of wort, for a 5 gallon batch?

Yeah that will definitely affect your gravity reading.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 03:38 PM   #6
bknifefight
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Dec 2009
PA
Posts: 1,956
Liked 109 Times on 82 Posts


That is double what it should be. I am guessing you took the sample before you topped it off to 5 gallons.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 04:40 PM   #7
rpatton
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Orange County, CA
Posts: 41

Yes, I took the sample from the pot, and probably near the bottom due to the wine thief I was using. Thank you for the feedback - I guess I won't worry about the beer, just a shame I don't have an accurate reading. The past two times I sampled from the pot it was right on the expected OG, but it sounds like it is better to bring it to the full 5 gallons first.

Thanks everyone!
Rob

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 05:01 PM   #8
lurker18
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
lurker18's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 640
Liked 23 Times on 22 Posts


If the last two times were right on before adding top off water, then they really weren't right on. Once you add the top off water, the OG will come down depending on the amount of water added. If you didn't add any water, then they would have been right on.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 05:29 PM   #9
krelin
Recipes 
 
May 2010
San Diego
Posts: 48
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


You could probably still try for an OG reading now (be sterile!), unless you've got fermentation already?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 05:53 PM   #10
humann_brewing
More Humann than human
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
humann_brewing's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
the sun
Posts: 15,536
Liked 328 Times on 324 Posts


so you made a 3.4 gallon batch



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FG higher than expected - not sure what to do C2H6O Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 05-25-2010 04:23 PM
Higher Than Expected OG w/Extract Kit? Shooter Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 9 04-13-2009 03:13 AM
Higher than expected OG Badger454 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 8 11-04-2008 02:04 PM
OG higher that expected. Corey_James General Techniques 9 08-31-2008 04:22 AM
OG Higher Than Expected Sluggo All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 5 01-01-2008 03:25 PM


Forum Jump