Secondary Fermentation for Stout - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Secondary Fermentation for Stout

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2010, 05:58 PM   #1
JBZSTL
Recipes 
 
Aug 2009
Saint Louis
Posts: 66


Is it necessary to transfer a stout for secondary fermentation or am I wasting my time? I have been told that with a stout it really isn't necessary and from everything I have read there is no true consensus.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 06:06 PM   #2
JohnnyO
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
Hamden, CT
Posts: 8,999
Liked 917 Times on 857 Posts


I don't believe it's necessary. The only reason I've read that you need to transfer to secondary would be to aid in clearing the beer (no point with a stout) or to dry hop (if you're dry hopping a stout, you are a true visionary my friend).


__________________
Fermenting: Munich Helles, Mole Porter, White IPA, SMaSH 2Row/Jarrylo
Drinking: Cider, Stout
On Deck: TBD

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 06:11 PM   #3
Clonefarmer
Recipes 
 
May 2008
Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,329
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by JBZSTL View Post
Is it necessary to transfer a stout for secondary fermentation or am I wasting my time? I have been told that with a stout it really isn't necessary and from everything I have read there is no true consensus.
If given enough time for the yeast to drop out there is no need. If you wanted to cold crash, add fruit, chocolate or coffee it can be useful.
__________________
"Just remember Scooty Puff Jr. sucks!"....Philip J. Fry

Newsman Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 08:58 PM   #4
JayInJersey
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
JayInJersey's Avatar
Recipes 
 
May 2009
New Jersey
Posts: 594
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


<- Firm believer in one beer one vessel for fermentation .



But this is one of those 6 in one hand half dozen in the other arguments
__________________
Hazard Brewing

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 09:41 PM   #5
JJL
Recipes 
 
Feb 2010
, WI
Posts: 1,291
Liked 30 Times on 23 Posts


It doesn't really matter much either way for a stout. Actually, this is the case with most ales. The benefits you gain from a secondary are mostly cosmetic. I wouldn't bother with the secondary unless you are planning to add some additional ingredients after primary fermentation or you are planning to wait a while before you are going to bottle it. I typically use a secondary, but only because I never know when I am going to get around to bottling.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 12:05 AM   #6
Zamial
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
WI
Posts: 3,183
Liked 176 Times on 157 Posts


I would definitely secondary a stout. I am NOT doubting your skills but rather mine...I know I always get some trub when I siphon but in a beer I could probably not see through well it would probably pretty easy to do. I do not like to chew my beer...
__________________
I'm not drunk, I'm from Wisconsin.
We have been out drinking your state since 1848!

Newsman Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 12:12 AM   #7
TheGeek
Recipes 
 
Feb 2010
Indiana
Posts: 174
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


Racking to secondary is usually more of a pipeline necessity for me, I need the bucket for bottling or something else so I rack to free it up. heh.
__________________
Nerd:Beer is science!
Hippy:Beer is art!
Me:Beer is GOOD!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 01:17 AM   #8
WickedLB
Recipes 
 
Jan 2010
Worcester
Posts: 108

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyO View Post
I don't believe it's necessary. The only reason I've read that you need to transfer to secondary would be to aid in clearing the beer (no point with a stout) or to dry hop (if you're dry hopping a stout, you are a true visionary my friend).
+1 on no secondary. After 3 weeks in the primary, you should have little issue racking to a bottling bucket (or keg) and leaving the trub behind.
__________________
Coming Soon: Saison, Amarillo SMaSH, Oktoberfest
Primary1: APA
Primary2: Belgian Wit
Keg 1: Empty =(
Keg 2: Blonde Ale

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 02:07 AM   #9
BigB
Recipes 
 
Dec 2009
Shelby Twp, MI
Posts: 1,757
Liked 45 Times on 39 Posts


I agree there is no need for a secondary. I personally would leave a stout in the primary for 4 weeks, then bottle. If you use an autosiphon to transfer to the bottling bucket, you should have little to no trub transferred. If you let the bottling bucket sit for 30 minutes after mixing in the priming sugar, then you should get no trub in the bottle. Now if you are kegging, all the more reason to skip the secondary.
__________________
I love the sound of an airlock bubbling in the morning. It sounds like.....VICTORY.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TxBrew
It's now degenerating into nu uh and uh huhs and it no longer serves a point.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 11:00 PM   #10
echotraveler
Recipes 
 
Apr 2010
Puerto Rico
Posts: 96
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


very interesting... if i knew this before! i would have use the glass carboy as fermenter instead of using the plastic bucket.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stout secondary Blackhawkbrew Extract Brewing 2 05-31-2008 06:19 PM
My first stout- should I do a secondary? HoosierDaddy General Techniques 6 04-28-2008 03:25 PM
Secondary a stout? mullimat Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 03-25-2008 02:47 AM
Secondary Carboy Fermentation Vs. Secondary Bottling Fermintation. MntFresh General Techniques 9 05-17-2007 06:58 PM
How long should I let my stout age in secondary? Evan! General Techniques 6 10-08-2006 11:38 PM


Forum Jump