Okay, What would you do? - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Okay, What would you do?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2010, 11:19 PM   #1
jdp
Recipes 
 
Apr 2009
the other part of california. Pines, not palms
Posts: 231
Liked 34 Times on 14 Posts



I just racked to keg with a steam clone I made a few weeks ago. I am getting ready to make another one. The beer was obviously flat, but no off flavors and pretty tasty. Should I use the smack pack and underpitch (as I have recently learned) or just get a scoopfull of the yeast on the bottom of the bucket and pitch that? How about both? the one in the bucket is white labs, and the yeast that came with the ingredents for tonights batch is wyeast. both are thier California common yeast

with tonights runnings, I am going to reserve some for making a starter on the next batch, but that doesn't help me out tonight.
__________________
Niedrige Klasse Braugesellschaft

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 12:00 AM   #2
barleynhops
Recipes 
 
Nov 2009
Vancouver WA
Posts: 112

I've always been a reuser of yeast. Why not just use the whole yeast cake on your new batch though? That's pretty standard practice and assures a nice, fast, vigorous fermentation.
__________________
Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to make water, a vital ingredient in beer.
-Dave Barry-

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 12:05 AM   #3
TipsyDragon
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
California
Posts: 2,607
Liked 25 Times on 23 Posts


what are you trying to do here? i see allot of questions and no explanation of what your trying to do.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 12:09 AM   #4
danielinva
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
Henrico, VA
Posts: 259
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by barleynhops View Post
I've always been a reuser of yeast. Why not just use the whole yeast cake on your new batch though? That's pretty standard practice and assures a nice, fast, vigorous fermentation.
Would you want a fast, vigorous fermentation with a california common? While that's not a favorite style of mine, I was under the impression that you would want the esters produced during yeast reproduction. Wouldn't using the whole yeast cake make the beer turn out a bit more clean?

I would look into yeast washing. Here's a helpful link to that process.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 12:37 AM   #5
jdp
Recipes 
 
Apr 2009
the other part of california. Pines, not palms
Posts: 231
Liked 34 Times on 14 Posts


thats a good write up, I will try that next time.
Unfornately this time I racked into the keg, poured off the top layer of crud, then scooped up just over a cups worth of yeast with a sanitized measureing cup. I then covered it with sanitized saran wrap and stuck it in the fridge. I haven't popped the smack pack yet, but I can still do it if I need to.
__________________
Niedrige Klasse Braugesellschaft

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 12:45 AM   #6
Doc Robinson
 
Doc Robinson's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
Bonita Springs, Florida
Posts: 2,354
Liked 20 Times on 16 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by TipsyDragon View Post
what are you trying to do here? i see allot of questions and no explanation of what your trying to do.
Yeah...wtf is going on here?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 01:05 AM   #7
jdp
Recipes 
 
Apr 2009
the other part of california. Pines, not palms
Posts: 231
Liked 34 Times on 14 Posts


Quote:
I just racked to keg with a steam clone
This would be the previous batch


Quote:
I am getting ready to make another one.
As in another Steam Clone

Quote:
Should I use the smack pack and underpitch (as I have recently learned) or just get a scoopfull of the yeast on the bottom of the bucket and pitch that
I have learned here that using one smack pack is underpitching yeast, I am just trying trying to find out if it is worth the effort to use some of the yeast from the previous batch, or if I should just use the smack pack.

Quote:
How about both?
I don't know if there would be any advantage to using both yeasts. they are similar strains but different brands.


I realize how this post looks, I am not trying to be an arse. I ramble quite a bit and this post is trying to clarify as much as I can.
__________________
Niedrige Klasse Braugesellschaft

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 01:16 AM   #8
android
 
android's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Ames, Iowa
Posts: 3,062
Liked 44 Times on 35 Posts


i would definitely use some of the yeast from the previous batch. i probably wouldn't use all of it though, that will be overpitching, which isn't all bad, but if you use ~1/2 of it (see mr. malty pitch rate calculator for exact mL of yeast to collect), that should be plenty. from what i've experienced and heard, yeast will progressively produce better beers if you use the same batch.
__________________
primary: APA

ebay temp controller | thermostat temp controller

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 02:32 AM   #9
wyzazz
Recipes 
 
Aug 2009
Atwater, OH
Posts: 4,315
Liked 56 Times on 53 Posts


Wash and repitch. Good stuff!!!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revvy View Post
And I'd like to see my 1.080 beers ready from grain to glass in a week, and served to me by red-headed twin penthouse pets wearing garter belts and fishnet stockings, with Irish accents, calling me "master luv gun," but we can't always get what we want can we? :)

 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 02:47 AM   #10
PT Ray
Recipes 
 
Aug 2005
Posts: 1,373
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


Another vote for repitching. For an average gravity beer I'll pitch from 50-100ml (per 5 gallons of wort) of slurry depending on if it's an ale or lager.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump