aluminum immersion chiller - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > aluminum immersion chiller
Cool Brewing Giveaway - Supporting Membership Drive & Discount

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2006, 03:17 AM   #1
dantodd
 
dantodd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2006
San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,157
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts



Any significant disadvantage to using aluminum for an immersion chiller? It is about 1/3 the cost of copper tubing at OSH.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 03:28 AM   #2
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
Southwest
Posts: 14,238
Liked 780 Times on 497 Posts


Nope. Just don't tell the Aluminazis. ...and always sanitize with bleach! (maybe not the aluminum, though...)


__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 03:30 AM   #3
dantodd
 
dantodd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2006
San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,157
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts


That's sort of what I was thinking. Since my kettle is aluminum too I'm sure you can guess where the aluminazis stand on my list...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:22 AM   #4
EvilTOJ
 
EvilTOJ's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2005
Portland, OR, Oregon
Posts: 6,390
Liked 49 Times on 34 Posts


You won't get as good of a heat transfer with aluminium than you would with copper, but if I were in your situation, I'd go for the aluminium tubing too.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:23 AM   #5
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
Southwest
Posts: 14,238
Liked 780 Times on 497 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by eviltwinofjoni
You won't get as good of a heat transfer with aluminium than you would with copper, but if I were in your situation, I'd go for the aluminium tubing too.
INCORRECT! Stainless would be less efficient as a heat conductor, but aluminum is at least as good a heat conductor as copper, if not better.
__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:44 AM   #6
dantodd
 
dantodd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2006
San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,157
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts


Man I love google!

Aluminum, 136 BTU/(hr - ft - dF)
Copper 231 BTU/(hr - ft - dF)

I can easily put twice the aluminum for less than copper. I'm not sure if I really want 2X the tubing for the same cooling though. I also don't know exactly how much faster copper of the same length would cool the wort or how much more aluminum it takes to get similar results.

lots to think about....

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:49 AM   #7
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
Southwest
Posts: 14,238
Liked 780 Times on 497 Posts


Nice find! I guess I was slightly incorrect about aluminum being as efficient as copper. Even so, there's a reason they make aluminum radiators... The heat transfer potential also depends on the thickness of the tubing.
__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:50 AM   #8
Beer Snob
 
Beer Snob's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2005
Farmington
Posts: 2,041
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuri_Rage
INCORRECT! Stainless would be less efficient as a heat conductor, but aluminum is at least as good a heat conductor as copper, if not better.
Not sure if I'd say that... if that was the case wouldn't we see aluminum bottoms on expensive pots instead of copper? Not saying that I know this... just trying to follow the thought of the bottom of expensive pots thats all
__________________
Michael

"Don't worry, have a homebrew." ,"The "Bible"

Cherries in the wheat
Michael's Wheat

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:55 AM   #9
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
Southwest
Posts: 14,238
Liked 780 Times on 497 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer Snob
Not sure if I'd say that... if that was the case wouldn't we see aluminum bottoms on expensive pots instead of copper? Not saying that I know this... just trying to follow the thought of the bottom of expensive pots thats all
I already acknowledged my mistake, but a lot of expensive stainless pots have a sandwiched aluminum core for exactly the same reason.
__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc

 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 02:56 AM   #10
Beer Snob
 
Beer Snob's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2005
Farmington
Posts: 2,041
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuri_Rage
I already acknowledged my mistake, but a lot of expensive stainless pots have a sandwiched aluminum core for exactly the same reason.
Oh sorry. My bad. Did not read far enough down


__________________
Michael

"Don't worry, have a homebrew." ,"The "Bible"

Cherries in the wheat
Michael's Wheat

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Immersion chiller + sirsloop Equipment/Sanitation 17 03-21-2009 03:25 AM
New immersion chiller ghack Chillers & Stir Plates 6 02-16-2009 11:34 PM
Aluminum Immersion Chiller PAbrewer07 Equipment/Sanitation 13 02-10-2008 08:17 PM
New immersion chiller Treekiller Equipment/Sanitation 0 03-03-2006 02:14 AM
Immersion chiller set-up Alestar Equipment/Sanitation 2 12-01-2005 12:21 AM


Forum Jump