The great bubble debate - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Bottling/Kegging > The great bubble debate

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2009, 10:40 PM   #1
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2006
Southwest
Posts: 14,278
Liked 792 Times on 505 Posts



I've seen all sorts of speculation about bubbles in beer. Some think that natural carbonation results in finer bubbles than force carbonation. Others think that priming with table sugar results in coarser bubbles than priming with dextrose or malt extract. Still others say that yeast type will impact bubble "fineness" (i.e., champagne yeast makes fine bubbles, while ale yeast makes bigger ones).

I contend that temperature, dissolved CO2 content, viscosity, sugar content, protein content, hop compounds, etc are the things that impact how a beer "bubbles." After all, dissolved CO2 doesn't care about its source; it simply wants to be in equilibrium, bubbling to the surface when released from the confines of a pressure vessel (i.e., bottle or keg).

Discuss.


__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 11:16 PM   #2
TipsyDragon
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
California
Posts: 2,607
Liked 24 Times on 22 Posts


i agree for the most part. bubbles form in nucleation points, which are just tiny pits in a surface and CO2 is CO2. the composition of the finished beer and what is used to carbonate the beer will coat the inside of the bottle or keg. this will affect the formation of nucleation sights.

temperature and dissolved CO2 content will affect the quantity of bubbles but not their quality.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 02:36 AM   #3
JKoravos
Recipes 
 
Jul 2009
Chelmsford, MA
Posts: 1,203
Liked 73 Times on 54 Posts


I agree, natural vs. force carbonated has no affect on bubble size. If it does, I've never seen any credible argument to support it. From a chemistry perspective it shouldn't matter.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 02:44 AM   #4
Rick500
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
KY
Posts: 2,612
Liked 15 Times on 13 Posts


I generally keg most of a batch and naturally carb 6 or 12 bottles. I haven't noticed any difference in the appearance or feel of the CO2 bubbles between the keg and the bottles.

The recipe has everything to do with the texture of the head and the mouthfeel of the beer.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 02:54 AM   #5
Gremlyn
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,358
Liked 29 Times on 19 Posts


Oh come on guys, we all know that CO2 bubbles are sentient life forms that spring to life in different ways. If you force carb, the CO2 creates different bubble-lives than the CO2 farted out by the yeasties.
Gosh.... IDIOTS!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
I'm a fan of "getting it in the can"!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 03:52 AM   #6
RDWHAHB
Recipes 
 
Oct 2009
Denver
Posts: 836
Liked 14 Times on 12 Posts


I think CO2 is CO2. No matter if a yeast farted it out, or a 20lb tank farted it out. There is likely 100 different factors for bubble size, texture, etc., but I doubt the source of CO2 is one.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 12:36 PM   #7
Spyd3r
Recipes 
 
Aug 2009
Florida
Posts: 159
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


CO2 is CO2. I don't think that anyone would disagree with that concept. The thing that intrigues me is the "source" of co2 and the method of introduction into the beer. Wouldn't the creation point make a difference?

If the CO2 is created within the liquid, and the liquid itself is bubbling, shouldn't it react different than CO2 that is dissolved from the top down?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 12:47 PM   #8
HenryHill
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
HenryHill's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
Perry, MI
Posts: 3,040
Liked 11 Times on 11 Posts


I'd like to know the direct path to finer bubbles when and in whatever beer I choose.

I've noticed it more in my darker beers, but I have no clue why and how, but I like it. Not so much in pales or IPA's...and that's cool, too.

I don't like viscous or sweet in any of my beers, and it would seem protein would be close between the pales, IPA's, browns and stouts that I prefer.

Hasn't this been discussed and solved by at least one of the many brewing book authors?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by orfy
Never mock another man's brewery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrregularPulse View Post
This is HBT of course. Normal Thread that goes every direction but the one intended. This forum should be scientific proof the beer causes ADD

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 01:09 PM   #9
EvilGnome6
Recipes 
 
May 2009
Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 664
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts


Come to think of it, the beers I've made that had really low FGs (1.002-1.006) had coarser bubbles than the beers I've made that had higher FGs (1.010-1.024).

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 03:16 PM   #10
TipsyDragon
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
California
Posts: 2,607
Liked 24 Times on 22 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Spyd3r View Post
If the CO2 is created within the liquid, and the liquid itself is bubbling, shouldn't it react different than CO2 that is dissolved from the top down?
answer... no. it doesn't matter how the CO2 got in there it is still CO2. the only thing that would affect bubbles in beer is the nucleation sites in the bottle. now what affects the nucleation sites on the other hand. the bottle/glass its poured in and the composition of the beer would affect the bubbles.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The great starter debate brewhead General Techniques 45 02-23-2008 11:19 PM


Forum Jump