Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Fermentation & Yeast > Diacetyl Reduction (alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase)
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-22-2009, 09:09 PM   #1
lamarguy
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,657
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default Diacetyl Reduction (alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase)

Background: It's the age old problem - how to reduce or eliminate diacetyl in beer...There's a new product on the market (ALDC enzyme) that actively converts the precursor to diacetyl into a high-threshold flavor compound. This effectively eliminates the need for a "diacetyl rest" and reduces the conditioning time since the yeast don't need to later convert the diacetyl themselves.

Problem: No one seems to carry it in the US. AHS used to carry it, but no longer does.

Proposal: Group buy on ALDC direct from the Chinese manufacturer. I contacted the biochem group and they offered a free 2 kg sample, but we would need to pay the FedEx shipping ($60). Besides, 2 kg would last me a lifetime and the shelf life is only one year (refrigerated).

Is there any interest?

Before someone says it, I realize there are existing methods for reducing diacetyl in beer - diacetyl rest, cold pitching (e.g. 45F), high pitch rate, etc. This discussion is about eliminating the formation of diacetyl altogether.


__________________
Doggfather Brewery

Planned: Lambic, American IPA
Fermenting: 6 gals of 1.090 stout (Belgian) & 6 gals of 1.090 stout (English)
Tapped: Berliner Weisse, Black English IPA, German Pils, & Live Oak Primus
lamarguy is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 03:56 PM   #2
lamarguy
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,657
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Hmmmm....Nada...


__________________
Doggfather Brewery

Planned: Lambic, American IPA
Fermenting: 6 gals of 1.090 stout (Belgian) & 6 gals of 1.090 stout (English)
Tapped: Berliner Weisse, Black English IPA, German Pils, & Live Oak Primus
lamarguy is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 04:10 PM   #3
Bokonon
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 1,297
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts

Default

For $5 or so I would give it a try, but that seems like a bit much to pay for something that really isn't a huge problem for homebrewers. I'm never in a big rush to move stuff out of my fermenters, unlike a pro who has to keep moving product.
Bokonon is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:53 PM   #4
TexLaw
Here's Lookin' Atcha!
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TexLaw's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,698
Liked 27 Times on 26 Posts

Default

No. I have no interest in that. I just use yeast to get rid of unwanted diacetyl, and I'm gonna dance with the one brung me.


TL
__________________
Beer is good for anything from hot dogs to heartache.

Drinking Frog Brewery, est. 1993
TexLaw is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:02 PM   #5
Bob
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christiansted, St Croix, USVI, US Virgin Islands
Posts: 3,932
Liked 133 Times on 100 Posts
Likes Given: 36

Default

I concur with Tex. I reduce diacetyl the old-fashioned way: by brewing, not fiddling with enzymes and chemicals.

If brewing chemistry floats your boat, by all means have fun. But realize that this stuff is developed for humongous commercial beer factories to reduce tank time and make more money.

I'd rather practice my craft than put an additive into my beer that doesn't eliminate the brewing-technique problems of diacetyl-precursor formation. Indeed, from your description it sounds like the product just masks the problem, simply raising the concentration threshold above what is required for humans to detect.

So yeah, old-fart brewers probably aren't going to buy in.

Cheers,

Bob
__________________
Brewmaster
Fort Christian Brewpub
St Croix, US Virgin Islands
Bob is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:17 PM   #6
lamarguy
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,657
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NQ3X View Post
I'd rather practice my craft than put an additive into my beer that doesn't eliminate the brewing-technique problems of diacetyl-precursor formation. Indeed, from your description it sounds like the product just masks the problem, simply raising the concentration threshold above what is required for humans to detect.
Thanks for the comments. One correction - all beers produce diacetyl during fermentation, this enzyme is just a slick method for rapidly accelerating the conditioning process since there will be a significantly reduced amount of yeast by-product to be "consumed".


__________________
Doggfather Brewery

Planned: Lambic, American IPA
Fermenting: 6 gals of 1.090 stout (Belgian) & 6 gals of 1.090 stout (English)
Tapped: Berliner Weisse, Black English IPA, German Pils, & Live Oak Primus
lamarguy is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
subbing hops: target hops (high alpha) for something normal alpha jigidyjim Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 09-27-2009 07:44 AM
Excessive reduction in SG? Wables All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 1 01-24-2009 06:21 AM
AG - Volume Reduction Boiling? Cpt_Kirks Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 12-13-2008 02:13 AM
Reduction of Priming Sugar Chimney Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 07-01-2008 01:36 PM
RPM reduction options? Brewpastor Equipment/Sanitation 16 11-09-2006 11:04 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS