Coldbreak Brewing HERMS Giveaway!

HomeBrewSupply AMCYL Brew Kettle Giveaway!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > General Beer Discussion > 40QT Kettle and Fermcap - Redundant?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2009, 11:06 AM   #1
JoeMama
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,224
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default 40QT Kettle and Fermcap - Redundant?

I recently bought a new brew kettle (with a ball valve no less!!) and I nearly *insert sexual reference here* out of sheer excitement. It was so big and shiny but it also got me to thinking.,,

Sure I have been doing 5 gallon batches and once thought that this would be plenty sufficient, but now that others are showing interest and running out of beer sucks, Ive been contemplating 10 gallon batches.

Okay, to my point... 40QT kettle was initially to upgrade from the turkey fryer cause boilovers are kind of a PITA. Fermcap drops were for this purpose as well. But with such a huge kettle and 5 gallon batches, I dont foresee boilovers being an issue even without Fermcap drops.

And then again 10 gallon batches are in essence not possible in seeing that the capacity of the kettle is 10 gallons and I need a few more for boil off.
*Sigh* The joys of new stuff and its limitations. Its kinda bittersweet
-Me


__________________
Ergo Bibo Sum - I drink, therefore I am.

Eggo Bibo Sum - I drink, therefore I waffle.
JoeMama is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 12:14 PM   #2
JesseRC
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,784
Liked 10 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I ended up buying a 40 qt for 5gal recipes and 60 qt for 10 gal recipes. While I could make 5 gal batches in the 60qt, it was a bit awkward.


__________________
Jesse

Primaries: Mojave Red (AG)
Kegs: Hibiscus Saison (AG), Orange Kolsch (AG) , Cocunut Porter
Future Brew: Wee Heavy
JesseRC is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 02:50 AM   #3
bhatchable
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 406
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

I brew 5 gallon batches in an 8.5 pot and still use it. it keeps the krauzen to max one inch, eliminating the need for a blow-off
__________________
Nunc Est Bibendum
bhatchable is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009, 09:33 AM   #4
adamjab19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkley, MI
Posts: 490
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhatchable View Post
I brew 5 gallon batches in an 8.5 pot and still use it. it keeps the krauzen to max one inch, eliminating the need for a blow-off

That's what I use my fermcap for.

An important point that should be obvious but wasn't to me until after I used fermcap for the first time. A boil over is a boil over. Fermcap doesn't stop a boil from happening so much as it only reduces the foam that comes from a boil, barely. Someone once posted a picture on here boiling what seemed like 8 gallons of wort in an 8.5 gallon brew pot exclaiming that fermcap made it possible. No way! A good vigorous boil for me with or without fermcap brings the wort level up a good inch or two. A few drops of a chemical isn't going to change that. Still gotta adjust the flame for the optimal boil.
__________________
Element Brewing
adamjab19 is offline
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fermcap in the boil = Fermcap in the ferm vessel? JoeMama Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 09-28-2009 07:26 PM
Another redundant question Redweasel Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 02-06-2008 03:33 AM
Vulcan 40qt stainless steel electric kettle olllllo Equipment/Sanitation 6 06-08-2007 06:59 PM
Diacetyl rest for an ale - redundant? Thor General Techniques 3 02-24-2006 05:47 PM


Forum Jump

Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS