is another reason wort chillers work because they keep the lid off - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > is another reason wort chillers work because they keep the lid off

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-27-2009, 12:21 AM   #1
jigidyjim
Recipes 
 
Mar 2009
Oakland, CA
Posts: 696
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts



I was thinking of ways to get my ice-bath time down, and I realized that when you use a wort chiller, the lid isn't flush on the kettle... I wonder how much this has an affect on the chill speed?

maybe I could do something similar when I'm ice-bathing, just crack open the kettle lid with something?



 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 12:45 AM   #2
RogerMcAllen
Recipes 
 
Apr 2009
Decatur, IL
Posts: 623
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts


Just take the lid off.

Evaporation is the most efficient method of cooling since you are removing the most energetic (hottest) water molecules. Imagine a kindergarten class full of screaming kids. If you start to take the kids out one at a time starting with the loudest it gets quiet fairly quickly. If you try to quiet all of them at once it takes a lot longer.



 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 12:51 AM   #3
beersydoesit
Recipes 
 
Nov 2008
Madison, Wi
Posts: 330
Liked 6 Times on 4 Posts


I tried to leave the lid off completely when ice bathing, but there is always the chance something could fall in. ( have a chiller now)

I would take the lid off when the kettle was just sitting there and put it back on whenever I was doing anything around the kettle, like adding/ replacing water or ice.

I should point out that I did it for partial boils in the kitchen sink, or full boils outside in winter. I think both reduce the risks by some amount.


There is some risk but I judged it small in my circumstances. If you just crack the lid the effectiveness and risk will both be diminished.
__________________
Dave in Madison

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 05:17 AM   #4
ifishsum
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
Portland OR
Posts: 1,447
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts


I leave the lid off for cooling, at least for the first 10 minutes or so. With the steam and heat rising from the surface, it's unlikely that anything bad will be able to fall in, and with the lid off you can stir it easier and help it cool that much quicker.
__________________
"If you're gonna be an ape, be a hairy one" - Spyder

Primary 2: Edwort's Robust Porter
Secondary 1: LW Pale Ale
Secondary 1: Blackened Soul RIS
Kegged: Dead Guy Ale
Kegged: Rye Pale Ale
Kegged: Haus Pale Ale
Kegged: Nut Brown Ale
Kegged: Afrikan Amber
Kegged: Jock Scott Ale
Kegged: Afrikan Amber

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 05:53 AM   #5
DRoyLenz
Recipes 
 
Jun 2009
Chicago
Posts: 702
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts


I think the greatest advantage you have to keeping the lid off (as mentioned) is ease of stirring the wort, which in my mind, is the best thing you can do to speed the cooling process. I haven't moved up to a wort chiller yet, I just use an ice bath. That being said, when the kettle is sitting in an ice bath, I notice that the temperature of the wort stays very constant, until I stir it, and stir the ice bath. If I do this every 10-15 minutes, I'll notice a drop of 5-10 degrees in the first minute following stirring.

I think if you leave the lid off of the kettle (or especially just crack it) without stirring the wort, you won't notice much of a difference in cooling times. That's because the cooled wort just hangs out on top of the rest of the wort, and insulates the rest of the wort from the cooling effects of the evaporation.

IMO, wort chiller or not, stir the wort regularly with a sanitized spoon every 10 minutes, and you'll cut down on your cooling time significantly.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 06:16 PM   #6
uncleozzy
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
LI, NY
Posts: 168

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRoyLenz View Post
IMO, wort chiller or not, stir the wort regularly with a sanitized spoon every 10 minutes, and you'll cut down on your cooling time significantly.
Hell, I do partial boils and stir the wort (and ice bath) constantly in my sink. I can cool 3 gallons from boiling to 85F in 10-15 minutes, easy. Top it up with 2 gallons of 40F water, and you're good to pitch.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 06:27 PM   #7
Quikfeet509
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
Kansas City - the mecca of civilization
Posts: 56

I also stumbled across this in my attempt to not by a wort chiller. Last night I was able to get my 3 gallons of wort from 212*F (approximate) to 120*F with an ice bath and stirring in 10 minutes, then added 2 gallons of 40*F water from the fridge and ended at 65*F (overshot a bit).

All in under 15 minutes. I was told a wort chiller does it in 30 minutes, does that sound right? If so, what's the benefit?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 07:48 PM   #8
ifishsum
Recipes 
 
Aug 2008
Portland OR
Posts: 1,447
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Quikfeet509 View Post
All in under 15 minutes. I was told a wort chiller does it in 30 minutes, does that sound right? If so, what's the benefit?
Probably isn't much of one if you're topping up, but for those who do a full boil it will make a huge difference in cooling ability. Those 2-3 gallons of chilled water make a huge difference.
__________________
"If you're gonna be an ape, be a hairy one" - Spyder

Primary 2: Edwort's Robust Porter
Secondary 1: LW Pale Ale
Secondary 1: Blackened Soul RIS
Kegged: Dead Guy Ale
Kegged: Rye Pale Ale
Kegged: Haus Pale Ale
Kegged: Nut Brown Ale
Kegged: Afrikan Amber
Kegged: Jock Scott Ale
Kegged: Afrikan Amber

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 07:49 PM   #9
Whiskey
Recipes 
 
Jul 2007
Granville, Ohio
Posts: 717
Liked 13 Times on 10 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Quikfeet509 View Post
I also stumbled across this in my attempt to not by a wort chiller. Last night I was able to get my 3 gallons of wort from 212*F (approximate) to 120*F with an ice bath and stirring in 10 minutes, then added 2 gallons of 40*F water from the fridge and ended at 65*F (overshot a bit).

All in under 15 minutes. I was told a wort chiller does it in 30 minutes, does that sound right? If so, what's the benefit?
Not having to move 5gallons of boiling syrup across the kitchen/garage for one. This is especially the case once you start doing full boils.
__________________
Insert catchy signature here....


 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 04:10 AM   #10
smackythefrog
Recipes 
 
Jul 2009
ma
Posts: 69
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerMcAllen View Post
Just take the lid off.

Evaporation is the most efficient method of cooling since you are removing the most energetic (hottest) water molecules. Imagine a kindergarten class full of screaming kids. If you start to take the kids out one at a time starting with the loudest it gets quiet fairly quickly. If you try to quiet all of them at once it takes a lot longer.
I don't know why, but just picturing this made me laugh really hard. Little loud bastard kids. Take em' all out. One by one. For some reason it was a midget with a handlebar mustache and a potato sack. That's just me though.


__________________
~~The D!rty Word Brewery~~

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any reason this won't work (Keezer under bar) FairbanksBrewinNoob Bottling/Kegging 7 04-03-2013 04:49 PM
Jet burner - any reason why this wouldn't work? Gordie Equipment/Sanitation 4 05-13-2008 06:53 PM
Wort Chillers efreem01 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 10 06-21-2007 05:55 AM
Using beer to make a starter: is there any reason why this wouldn't work? Bosh General Techniques 10 05-20-2007 06:21 AM
is there a reason this pump won't work? Todd Equipment/Sanitation 6 02-12-2007 07:29 PM


Forum Jump