A new wrinkle in the Fly vs Batch debate: FWH - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > A new wrinkle in the Fly vs Batch debate: FWH

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-25-2009, 11:08 PM   #1
jldc
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
jldc's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2008
Posts: 661
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts



I batch sparge. So if I First Wort Hop, the hops only has about 10 min in contact with the first runnings before I start my boil. If somebody else fly sparges, the FWH has maybe 60 or more minutes in the non-boiling wort.

Is this a disadvantage for batch sparging? Does it matter?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 11:33 PM   #2
enderwig
 
enderwig's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
Dickinson Texas
Posts: 1,435
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts


It takes me 30-40 minutes to drain my first runnings, and put both batch sparges through. My FWH go in the kettle before I drain the first runnings, so I am getting at least 40 minutes contact time before it goes on the flame. It usually takes another 20 minutes on the flame to get boiling.
__________________
Read the
Homebrewtalk Wiki!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 12:56 AM   #3
Kaiser
 
Kaiser's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2005
Pepperell, MA
Posts: 3,895
Liked 127 Times on 73 Posts


Denny is a proponent of both batch sparging and FWHing. He should have some input.

I have used FWH with batch sparging myself. Contact time during lauter was about 30 min. Heating time is an additional 15-20 min. Bc I mash and lauter inside I cannot start heating until the lauter is done.

Kai

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2009, 01:01 AM   #4
jldc
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
jldc's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2008
Posts: 661
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


I drain my tun into my kettle and immediately put it on low heat. Then I batch sparge x 2 with little waiting (but lots of stirring), also draining into the kettle.

From opening my ball valve for the first time to full boil is under 30 min.

I suppose I could easily slow this down a bit if I wanted to FWH.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 04:17 PM   #5
jharres
Recipes 
 
Oct 2008
Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 187


Quote:
Originally Posted by jldc View Post
I drain my tun into my kettle and immediately put it on low heat. Then I batch sparge x 2 with little waiting (but lots of stirring), also draining into the kettle.

From opening my ball valve for the first time to full boil is under 30 min.

I suppose I could easily slow this down a bit if I wanted to FWH.
Do you vourlauf? Also, without waiting for the grainbed to settle after the first batch, do you lose or gain any efficiency? Is the beer considerably cloudier?

Sorry for the barrage of questions, I just find this very appealing in terms of cutting down time for brewing. Most of my brewing is done in the evening and this would be a welcome increase in work flow efficiency.

Regards,
Jacob
__________________
Primary: Beer
Secondary: Beer
Bottled: Beer
Drinking: Beer

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:26 PM   #6
malkore
 
malkore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2007
Nebraska
Posts: 6,922
Liked 37 Times on 35 Posts


vourlaufing never takes me more than 5 mins for the grain bed to settle enough to start draining.

I don't have 85% efficiency, but I think that's because I need to tweak my crush.
__________________
Malkore
Primary: English Mild
On tap: Pale Ale, Lancelot's Wheat, English Brown Ale, Steam Beer, HoovNuts IPA
Bottled: MOAM, Braggot, Raspberry Melomel, Merlot, Apfelwein, Pyment, Sweet mead, Cabernet
Gal in 2009: 27, Gal in 2010: 34, Gal in 2011: 13, Gal in 2012: 10

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 07:43 AM   #7
Poindexter
 
Poindexter's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2007
interior Alaska
Posts: 1,195
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts


In my dinky little PM system once I was hooked on FWH I went straight to throwing the hops in the mash tun.

For anything reasonably hoppy from an APA on up the IBU scale I just throw in all my (60) as "FWH" in the mash tun during the acid rest, uisually about an hour before I start heating the tun for the next rest stop.

FWIW my 2.5 gallon takes about 20 minutes to come to a boil on the stove top. FHW is "hoppier" than (60) but getting the hops intothe mash tun really brings out flavor depth I can't get any other way. Bitterness seems to be about the same, but the flavor is improved, dramatically. I suppose it is the low pH inthe tun during the acid rest that helps dissolve the alpha acids.

Mostly I am brewing APA's, I have made 3 IPAs lifetime. Never mind the extract batch. The second was FWH and the third was some in the mashtun and some FWH with the third adition at (1) and then dry hopped. Unless y'all come up with something better in the mean time, I'll repeat the most recent one, it's in my drop down.


 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 09:02 AM   #8
z987k
 
z987k's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Feb 2007
Anchorage
Posts: 3,518
Liked 29 Times on 27 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Poindexter View Post
I suppose it is the low pH inthe tun during the acid rest that helps dissolve the alpha acids.
Two things wrong with that. Alpha acids are more soluble in an alkaline solution(ref), and as temp rises, pH drops so the wort is more acidic in the higher rests and kettle than the acid rest. The acid rest just acidifies the mash, which then becomes more acidic than that as the temp goes up.

Other than that, I agree FW and mash hopping can not be replicated by late additions, it's very different.


 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 03:46 PM   #9
hirschy
Recipes 
 
Jul 2009
Scottsville, NY
Posts: 2

Ack! Phfttt!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 05:53 PM   #10
Denny
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Recipes 
 
Jun 2005
Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,703
Liked 624 Times on 447 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by jldc View Post
Is this a disadvantage for batch sparging? Does it matter?
My experience is no to both of those. You can debate theory, but that's my experience.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

http://www.experimentalbrew.com - "Homebrew All Stars" now shipping!

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools



Forum Jump