Thinner mash for I.P.A. - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Thinner mash for I.P.A.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2009, 04:30 AM   #1
telebrewer
Recipes 
 
Sep 2007
Planet Neptune / San Diego
Posts: 186
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts



Having read the post from 5/5/09 about brewing with a thinner mash, like 2 Qts./per # of grain, would that work for an I.P.A. type brew. Basically for bigger beers.

Also, my water is hard. I get a 7 for ph. Would this have a slight effect on efficiency?

I did a thin mash last brew, 2 qts./# and came out a 66% efficiency.

Thanks...

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 05:00 AM   #2
Yankeehillbrewer
Recipes 
 
Dec 2008
Yankee Hill, CA
Posts: 1,541
Liked 29 Times on 29 Posts


It will work fine. In Designing Great Beers by Ray Daniels he mentions that Pale Ales were historically mashed thick, 1qt/lb. But that is thick as hell, and efficiency would almost definitely suffer. Personally I would mash thinner.

pH will have an effect on your efficiency, I'm not sure how much, but you could search on Kaiser posts. He's one of the Science guru's on here, and I'm sure he's covered this in detail at some point. You might want to think about using a 5.2 buffer, but 7 is a pretty high pH. Some would say the 5.2 buffer wouldn't help, It works good for me and my well water.

Many other things can effect your efficiency as well, Crush being #1, Sparge water temps would probably be #2(and the length of the sparge if you are fly sparging)

Hope that's a little helpful

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 06:15 AM   #3
MVKTR2
Recipes 
 
Dec 2007
Sandy Hook, MS
Posts: 1,303
Liked 100 Times on 78 Posts


Yhb is steering you in the right direction on both accounts.

Your ph is a little high for pale biers, but would possibly work well for stouts/porters and the like. 5.2 buffer is probably a good option. If you've brewed any AG light biers before did they have a grainy flavor?

As for mash thickness I'm becoming more and more of a fan of thinner mashes. I've got a total of I think 14 or 15 brews under my belt, with the last 10 or so being AG. I've always gotten 70-72% effec. until my last 2 batches. I've hit 80% eff. doing the mini-flysparge process and using a higher mash-out temp in combination with a mash/sparge total volume of 3.5 qts. per lb. Thusly I'm a big fan of the 1.75 or 2 qts per lb mash!

Just my $.02

Schlante,
Phillip
__________________
"Perhaps wisdom for me is understanding how truely small I am, and that there is no smug self centered moment of clarity when there is so much more to learn" Anthony Bourdain

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 06:53 AM   #4
nealf
 
nealf's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2008
Hiram, GA
Posts: 1,350
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


I have been doing thinner mashes as well. I really haven't noticed a difference in efficiency, I probably need to crank down my Barley Crusher, but the difference in ease of grain to water integration is enough for me to keep using thin mashes, 1.5 - 2.0 qt/lb.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 11:27 AM   #5
The Pol
Recipes 
 
Feb 2007
Posts: 11,454
Liked 96 Times on 81 Posts


I mash thin too... 2qt/LB. I get 82% eff. regularly.

Mashing thin will help to improve your conversion eff. in the MLT, but the reduction in lauter eff. due to less sparge water, can steal some points from that end.

Basically there is a balance, in your system, where you get nearly 100% conversion eff. and still have enough sparge water left to get great lauter eff.

If you get too crazy with the thin mash, your lauter eff. will suffer (read not enough sparging)

If you get too crazy about sparging, your conversion eff. will suffer (read thick mash)

Some brewers are ALREADY at nearly 100% conversion eff., so when they mash thin, they arent gaining ANYTHING. BUT THEY ARE stealing sparge water from the back end of the process and thusly reducing thier lauter eff. This gives them a NET LOSS in eff.

That being said, the thinner mash REALLY helps to eliminate doughballs and greatly eases the process of mashing in. I love it.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 11:34 AM   #6
Beerrific
 
Beerrific's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Mar 2007
Georgia
Posts: 5,562
Liked 55 Times on 47 Posts


As far as the pH, is that the pH of the mash? Or your water? The pH of the water is not really important, if that is the pH of the mash, then you should work to get that down.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 12:21 PM   #7
SpanishCastleAle
 
SpanishCastleAle's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Central Florida
Posts: 4,345
Liked 36 Times on 36 Posts


Quote:
Some brewers are ALREADY at nearly 100% conversion eff., so when they mash thin, they arent gaining ANYTHING. BUT THEY ARE stealing sparge water from the back end of the process and thusly reducing thier lauter eff. This gives them a NET LOSS in eff.
That's where I'm at. I purposely do it that way with medium to low OG brews to prevent over-sparging.

That sure looks like a water pH and not a mash pH (and besides, mash pH varies with grain bill) and what Beerrific says is true...it's the mash pH that matters. Actually, 7.0 pH doesn't sound high for hard water. My bottled Spring Water is 7.0 pH and the bottled Drinking Water (which is harder) is 7.7 (but when used with the appropriate grain bill my mash pH is 5.2-5.4).
__________________
Early brewers were primarily women, mostly because it was deemed a woman's job. Mesopotamian men, of some 3,800 years ago, were obviously complete assclowns and had yet to realize the pleasure of brewing beer.- Beer Advocate


 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 01:40 PM   #8
conpewter
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
conpewter's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
East Dundee, Illinois
Posts: 5,109
Liked 53 Times on 48 Posts


I have really hard water but it is a PH of 7. PH is such a boiled down number that it does not tell you much about your brewing water. It is helpful to monitor the mash PH though.

The best bet is to get a water report from your water supply or get a Ward Lab report. Then use Palmer's spreadsheet at the bottom of this page
How to Brew - By John Palmer - Residual Alkalinity and Mash pH
along with his other info to get your RA in range and also your flavor affecting ions in range.

What I recently learned is that you should calculate two additions of brewing salts to the water. Make one addition to your mash tun as you mash in, this one is for whatever volume of water you are using to mash. Then make the rest of the additions for your sparge water in the kettle. You may want to acidify the mash water down to a PH of 6, but it is not usually necessary.
__________________
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." - V

Primary: Nothin
Secondary: Shady Lord RIS, Water to Barleywine, Pumpkin wine, burnt mead
Kegged: Crappy infected mild
Bottles: Apfelwein, 999 Barleywine, Oatmeal Stout, Robust Porter, Robust smoked porter, Simcoe Smash

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does Thinner Mash = Higher Efficiency? VTBrewer All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 5 09-27-2009 12:09 PM
Paint thinner and Mash Tun Question zman Equipment/Sanitation 7 09-16-2008 06:35 PM
Paint thinner Mishkin Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 10-20-2006 09:27 PM
Paint thinner? Windaria Cider Forum 13 10-31-2005 09:17 PM
when sparging thinner mashes Steve973 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 0 09-12-2005 02:49 PM


Forum Jump