EBC -> SRM formula; Weyermann malts have wrong colors? - Home Brew Forums

 Home Brew Forums > EBC -> SRM formula; Weyermann malts have wrong colors?

03-30-2009, 08:54 AM   #1
Piotr
Recipes

Jun 2008
Poland, EU
Posts: 463
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

While trying to find substitute for Crystal 60 amongst Wyeyermann caramel malts, and I've noticed something strange: EBC values given for those malts don't match SRM/Lovibond values!

example: for Caramunich III , 160 EBC they give 60 Lovibond
http://www.browamator.pl/zdjecia/3/9...munich_III.pdf
While it should be (SRM=EBC*0.508) around 80 Lov

I contacted Weyermann via my LHBS, and I got the answer:

Andreas Richter, Weyermann quality director explains, that they use formula published by Sibel Institute,
Lovibond = EBC x 0,375 + 0,56

I see this formula here and there in the net, sometimes they explain that this is formula for old EBC norm, abandoned in 1991 and should not be used any more.

Can somebody back me up with some knowledge, which formula is correct, so that I could continue the discussion with Weyermann.

03-30-2009, 11:37 AM   #2
remilard
Recipes

Nov 2008
Kansas City
Posts: 3,654
Liked 43 Times on 41 Posts

Lovibond is not the same as SRM.

SRM was designed to match lovibond well at lower numbers but there is no linear relationship between them.

EBC does related to SRM linearly and, ergo not to lovibond linearly.

03-30-2009, 12:30 PM   #3
Edcculus

Recipes

Jun 2007
Greenville, SC
Posts: 4,546
Liked 50 Times on 46 Posts

I've never looked into it that much, but this is my understanding:

Lovibond is the degree to which malt is roasted
SRM is a measure of how dark or light a beer is (does not indicate color)

03-30-2009, 05:16 PM   #4
menschmaschine

Recipes

Jun 2007
Delaware
Posts: 3,272
Liked 41 Times on 33 Posts

Noonan gives this formula: [EBC = (°L X 2.65) - 1.2] and states:
Quote:
 In the United States, color is expressed in terms of the Standard Research Method (SRM) values set by the ASBC or in °Lovibond, an older method of visual measurement upon which SRM is based (the two measurements are essentially equivalent).
__________________
END TRANSMISSION

03-30-2009, 05:45 PM   #5
remilard
Recipes

Nov 2008
Kansas City
Posts: 3,654
Liked 43 Times on 41 Posts

The Noonan relationship and the Siebel relationship are nearly identical.

Rearrange Noonan

Lov = .377EBC + .45

Compared to Siebel (via Weyermann)

Lov = .375EBC + .56

I would guess they are based on the same data and the Siebel formula was designed to be used by hand, using 3/8 as a convenient multiple.

03-30-2009, 06:18 PM   #6
Piotr
Recipes

Jun 2008
Poland, EU
Posts: 463
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

Noonan? Siebel? It is hard to argue with them...
I'm suprised that two completely different equations exist and nobody noticed it before. A few references for other equation:

wikipedia : Standard Reference Method - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
beersmith (after Ray Daniels) : Beer Color: Understanding SRM, Lovibond and EBC | Home Brewing Beer Blog by BeerSmith
seme other *pedia: Standard Reference Method - Zymipedia - Everything Beer, Wine, Spirits and Fermentation

03-31-2009, 08:59 AM   #7
Piotr
Recipes

Jun 2008
Poland, EU
Posts: 463
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

I've found some sort of explanation of the phenomenon:

EBC controversy

"However many maltsters and brewers still, especially in the US, use and reference to the older SRM-EBC conversion. So for convenience and to avoid some problems the older EBC values were used – hard to break old habits"

Does it mean, that in USA you use differnent EBC's than in Europe?

07-07-2010, 07:59 PM   #8
Mr_B
Recipes

Jul 2010
Winnipeg
Posts: 1
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

You all seem to be ignoring the only answer that was right.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by remilard Lovibond is not the same as SRM. SRM was designed to match lovibond well at lower numbers but there is no linear relationship between them. EBC does related to SRM linearly and, ergo not to lovibond linearly.
The Lovibond system was designed before the spectrometer was invented. To use it, one had to compare a vial of beer to a colored glass slide (with the naked eye).

SRM is ALMOST identical because they chose to measure SRM at a 420nm wavelength.

SRM=1.3546 x Lovibond - 0.76

EBC=SRM x 1.97 (or SRM=EBC x 0.508)

Therefor:
EBC = 1.97(1.3546 x Lovibond -0.76)
or
EBC = 2.66 x Lovibond - 1.5
And
Lovibond = EBC x 1/2.66 + 1.5/2.66
or
Lovibond = EBC x 0.375 + 0.56

Exactly what Weyermann said!

Saluci Likes This
07-07-2010, 08:35 PM   #9
SumnerH
Recipes

Feb 2009
Alexandria, VA, USA
Posts: 2,057
Liked 31 Times on 27 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Piotr I've found some sort of explanation of the phenomenon: EBC controversy "However many maltsters and brewers still, especially in the US, use and reference to the older SRM-EBC conversion. So for convenience and to avoid some problems the older EBC values were used – hard to break old habits" Does it mean, that in USA you use differnent EBC's than in Europe?
The USA doesn't use EBC, we use SRM/Lovibond.

Europe has historically used 2 different EBC scales (IIRC, the newer one came about around 1991). You need to know which one is being used in order to know how to convert it.
__________________
On deck: Little Bo Pils, Bretta Off Dead (Brett pale)
Secondary: Oude Bruin, Red Sky at Morning (Sour brown ale)
On tap: Saison Duphunk (sour), Amarillo Slim (IPA), Earl White (ginger/bergamot wit)
Bottled: Number 8 (Belgian Strong Dark Ale), Eternale (Barleywine), Ancho Villa (Ancho/pasilla/chocolate/cinnamon RIS), Oak smoked porter (1/2 maple bourbon oaked, 1/2 apple brandy oaked)

01-20-2013, 08:09 PM   #10
loetz
Recipes

Dec 2011
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 119
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts

Castle Malting from Belgium has a nice EBC SRM converter on their webpage that seems to be pretty accurate in my experience.

http://www.castlemalting.com/Default...nguage=English