racking to a secondary? really? - Home Brew Forums

Register Now!
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Extract Brewing > racking to a secondary? really?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2009, 10:55 PM   #1
bjzelectric
 
bjzelectric's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Feb 2009
Hillsborough, North Carolina
Posts: 202
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts



ive heard that racking to a secondary really isnt worth the risk of oxidation/contamination... is this true or is it worth it?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 10:57 PM   #2
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,229
Liked 7721 Times on 5424 Posts


It depends. I don't do it very often, but not because of risk of contamination or oxidation. I just think that it's not necessary for most lower OG ales. Three weeks in the fermenter is enough for me usually, assuming that fermentation had been finished for a while and the beer had a week or two to clear up some.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 10:58 PM   #3
schweaty
Doe Re Mi Beer
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
schweaty's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2008
Glass City
Posts: 1,808
Liked 45 Times on 20 Posts


This is one of those grey areas around here. Some people don't rack to secondary at all and just leave it in the primary the entire time. Others rack to secondary 3 or so days after fermentation is done. Me personally, I rack to secondary to clear up the beer.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 10:59 PM   #4
rsmith179
 
rsmith179's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Feb 2009
Cleveland, OH
Posts: 934
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


You'll hear tons of different answers in just a few minutes. I "personally" use a secondary, but I guess it's all personal preference. I wait at least two weeks and then transfer out of the primary to a secondary for an additional week. This allows for a somewhat clearer final product. As long as you are sanitary during your transfer process, you should have no problems going over to a secondary.
__________________
"Brewers enjoy working to make beer as much as drinking beer instead of working."
-Harold Rudolph

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:08 PM   #5
SumnerH
Recipes 
 
Feb 2009
Alexandria, VA, USA
Posts: 2,057
Liked 30 Times on 26 Posts


For me it depends on the beer. If it's something I'm struggling to clear, or if I need to dry-hop or add fruit/oak/etc, I'll secondary. If not, I might if it's high-gravity or I want to free up the primary for another brew. Usually I won't.
__________________
On deck: Little Bo Pils, Bretta Off Dead (Brett pale)
Secondary: Oude Bruin, Red Sky at Morning (Sour brown ale)
On tap: Saison Duphunk (sour), Amarillo Slim (IPA), Earl White (ginger/bergamot wit)
Bottled: Number 8 (Belgian Strong Dark Ale), Eternale (Barleywine), Ancho Villa (Ancho/pasilla/chocolate/cinnamon RIS), Oak smoked porter (1/2 maple bourbon oaked, 1/2 apple brandy oaked)

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:13 PM   #6
Stef1966
Recipes 
 
Nov 2008
Quebec, Canada
Posts: 390
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by rsmith179 View Post
You'll hear tons of different answers in just a few minutes. I "personally" use a secondary, but I guess it's all personal preference. I wait at least two weeks and then transfer out of the primary to a secondary for an additional week. This allows for a somewhat clearer final product. As long as you are sanitary during your transfer process, you should have no problems going over to a secondary.

This is exactly what i usually do.
But this last batch in process right now I'm trying it with no secondary racking at all just to see if there is any significant differences or advantages to do so or not.

So far i already see one advantage of the "no secondary" option, which is, less work, less cleaning and sanitizing.
__________________
As long as there is some Beer left, there is Hope.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:16 PM   #7
david_42
 
david_42's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Oct 2005
Willamina & Oak Grove, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25,593
Liked 151 Times on 142 Posts


Risk of oxidation ~0%
Risk of contamination - 0-100% depends on your sanitation

Need - no.
__________________
Remember one unassailable statistic, as explained by the late, great George Carlin: "Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!"

"I would like to die on Mars, just not on impact." Elon Musk

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:36 PM   #8
Jolly McStanson
Recipes 
 
Jan 2008
Newport RI
Posts: 232
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


I made a patch of Cascades/ Orange Pale ale from the recipe section, using just a primary. I dry hopped in the primary and every thing. I left it in there for about a month. It was clear when I kegged it. I aged it in the keg for another 3 weeks.

Its the best beer iv ever brewed to date.
__________________
Ingredients waiting to be brewed: nothing
Primary:
Kegged: half of something from last Spring
Kegged: half of something from last Spring
Kegged: half of something from last Spring

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009, 01:55 AM   #9
Winesburg Ale
Recipes 
 
Nov 2007
Ohio
Posts: 22
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


This is one of my favorite debates. I've tried both methods. I like to use a secondary because it tends to produce beers that look and taste cleaner. As a bonus, using a secondary usually prevents having yeast sediment at the bottom of the beer bottles. On the negative side, I really think it takes longer to carbonate beer that has been in a secondary for very long - maybe a lot of yeast settles out of the brew or just becomes less active due to aging in the high alcohol environment. One other item that warrants discussion is the flocculence of the yeast strain. Some yeasts (S05 is a good example) flocculate out pretty well, so they would be well suited to using without a secondary.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009, 02:00 AM   #10
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jun 2006
UP of Michigan, Winter Texan
Posts: 69,229
Liked 7721 Times on 5424 Posts


I guess my answer wasn't really complete- I "cheat" because I keg most of my beers so that's one reason I'm happy skipping a secondary. I can leave the beer in the keg for a few weeks until I tap it, and end up with crystal clear, well conditioned beer. If I was still bottling, I'd either do a secondary or a much longer primary. If I was doing a "big" beer, I'd definitely secondary it.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

 
Reply With Quote


Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Racking to Secondary wlampe Fermentation & Yeast 8 09-09-2009 07:43 PM
Racking to Secondary CPooley4 General Techniques 7 05-24-2009 02:06 PM
Racking to Secondary kjung Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 06-29-2008 06:44 PM
Racking to Secondary... mhdfj2 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 04-04-2008 11:46 AM
Racking to Secondary rcjmil General Techniques 3 06-18-2007 06:22 PM


Forum Jump