Thick mash vs. thin mash? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Thick mash vs. thin mash?
Cool Brewing Corny 5G & Mini Giveaway

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2009, 05:53 PM   #1
dsuarez
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 60

Hey there,

I know the consistency of your mash definitely effects the character of the finished beer, but how so. somebody told me that one fosters more proteolytic activity, where the other fosters diastatic activity. Can anybody shine some light on the differences that come from mashing thick vs. thin

FYI I used to mash pretty thin, so that there was a layer of water ontop of the grains, but now I mash on the thicker side, so the mash looks like slightly soupy oatmeal. dont know why though



 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 05:54 PM   #2
malkore
 
malkore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,922
Liked 37 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 9


I believe the idea is that a thicker mash means the enzymes are less diluted, so they are more available to actually convert sugars from the grains.

A thinner mash is easier to rinse the sugars during sparging, but too thin and you sacrifice efficiency. Thus you have to find that happy middle ground.

I could be wrong tho.


__________________
Malkore
Primary: English Mild
On tap: Pale Ale, Lancelot's Wheat, English Brown Ale, Steam Beer, HoovNuts IPA
Bottled: MOAM, Braggot, Raspberry Melomel, Merlot, Apfelwein, Pyment, Sweet mead, Cabernet
Gal in 2009: 27, Gal in 2010: 34, Gal in 2011: 13, Gal in 2012: 10

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 05:55 PM   #3
avaserfi
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 622
Likes Given: 5


There is a bit of discussion on the topic in this thread: http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f36/2qt-lb-mash-97302/
__________________
Andrew

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 05:56 PM   #4
McKBrew
 
McKBrew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hayden, Idaho
Posts: 8,180
Liked 35 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 8


Quote:
Originally Posted by avaserfi View Post
There is a bit of discussion on the topic in this thread: http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f36/2qt-lb-mash-97302/
Hey, I was going to post that link.

No big deal, I figured it would get posted by someone.
__________________
Make Beer, Not War.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 05:58 PM   #5
WortMonger
United States Mashtronaut
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
WortMonger's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Edmond, OK, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,118
Liked 33 Times on 31 Posts
Likes Given: 3


Here you go, very good information here!
__________________
"Beer... Nutritious and Delicious!"

"It's like a 15.5 gallon Mr. Beer!"

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 04:27 AM   #6
humann_brewing
More Humann than human
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
humann_brewing's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: the sun
Posts: 15,494
Liked 325 Times on 321 Posts
Likes Given: 22


well I thought I was going to learn something new here I have already gone through those other threads.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 05:12 AM   #7
GilaMinumBeer
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
GilaMinumBeer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 57,407
Liked 7137 Times on 5912 Posts
Likes Given: 127


"At mashing temperatures the survival and activity of the proteolytic system of enzymes is extremely dependent on mash thickness."


"Changes in mash thickness (liquor/grist ratio) have significant effects on mash performance (Hind, 1950; Hopkins and Krause, 1947; Harris and MacWilliam, 1961; Muller, 1989; 1991; Table 4.14). Very concentrated mashes, (liquor/grist <2:1 ml/g), are difficult to mix and pump, extract recoveries are reduced, starch conversion is slowed down, worts are more concentrated and viscous, TSN and FAN are increased and more high molecular weight nitrogenous substances remain in solution, but a lower proportion of hydrophobic peptides (relative to the amount of extract) are present, causing `high gravity' beers to have poor head retentions (Bryce et al., 1997). In the concentrated mashes both the enzymes and their substrates are more concentrated. Some enzymes (proteolytic enzymes, disaccharidases) are more stable in concentrated mashes producing higher proportions of TSN and hexose sugars respectively."


"The high concentrations of sugars and dextrins present in thick mashes can inhibit the amylases. Enzyme inhibition is due to the reduced availability of free water as well as to the sugars acting as competitive inhibitors."



"As the grist hydrates water is bound, and there is a rise in temperature caused by the release of heat (the `heat of hydration'). As the mash proceeds water is utilized in hydrolyses, a water molecule being consumed when any bond is split. Some water is more or less firmly bound (by hydrogen bonding) to starch, to sugars in solution, to glucans, to pentosans and to other substances reducing the concentration of `free' water. In all-malt mashes and mashes made with 50 : 50 malt and barley or wheat starch the extract recovered falls very sharply as the liquor/grist ratio is reduced below about 2.5 (Fig. 4.14). Generally, altering the liquor/grist ratio at values over 3 has comparatively minor effects, but these are not necessarily negligible. In a particular case mashing with a liquor/grist ratio of 2.5 : 1 gave an extract of 291 l Ž/kg, while at a ratio of 7 : 1 the extract was 311 l Ž/kg. The extent of water binding becomes progressively greater as mashes become more concentrated and there is insufficient free water to permit the gelatinization of much of the starch. The addition of more enzymes to a very thick mash does not quickly convert the ungelatinized starch and so does not enhance the extract obtained."




 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 02:47 PM   #8
david_42
 
david_42's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Willamina & Oak Grove, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25,578
Liked 148 Times on 139 Posts


Homebrewers seem to favor very thick mashes (1.25:1 or so), for reasons I've never understood. Maybe it's the urge to cram as much grain as possible into their systems. When I see people trying to do 14 lb mashes in a 5 gallon tun, I can only wonder.
__________________
Remember one unassailable statistic, as explained by the late, great George Carlin: "Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!"

"I would like to die on Mars, just not on impact." Elon Musk

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 03:03 PM   #9
Kilgore_Trout
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 559

I've gone to a thin mash (2qt/lb) and had better efficiency.

I can't tell a difference, but I brew mostly thinner styles anyway.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 03:08 PM   #10
Donasay
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,563
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts


I crammed 31 lbs into a 10g cooler once, learned never to do that again.


__________________
No matter how rich you are, you can still only drink 16 or 17 liters of beer a day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by quixotic View Post
The true definition of an addiction: not stopping even when a dog is having his way with you.:D
http://www.solutionsinmetal.com/

fred_k_ Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thick Mash vs Thin Mash Drunkagain All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 21 05-01-2016 04:04 PM
thick - thin mash question docmoran Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 04-09-2009 03:56 PM
Thin Mash GrundleCruncher All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 10 09-09-2007 02:12 PM
HELP thin mash what to do?? poetic_entropy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 04-18-2007 12:53 AM


Forum Jump