Opinions on this recipe - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > Opinions on this recipe

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2009, 01:16 AM   #1
TCJosh
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Posts: 62



Hey guys. I found this recipe for a Cherry "Lambic." From my understanding, true lambics take a long time to condition-this one obviously doesn't. I'm not too worried about the true defenition of lambic, more worried that it will be tasty. What do you think of the recipe?

Dark Cherry Lambic

5 LB. Munton's plain light DME
2 LB. wheat malt extract
3-1/2 oz. malto dextrin
1 oz. Hallertau hops
1 can Oregon Dark Sweet Cherry Puree
Wyeast #3278 Lambic Blend
Dissolve the light malt extract, wheat malt extract and malto dextrin in warm water. Bring to a boil and add hops. Boil for 45 minutes. Strain out hops. Add enough water to the fermenter to make 4.5 gallons and cool to 70 degrees. Pitch yeast, add fruit puree and ferment for 3 weeks Rack into secondary fermenter and condition for a week at 60-65 degrees. Bottle condition using corn sugar for priming.

Would you suggest adding the cherry into the secondary instead of the primary? I want to get a higher ABV out of this beer, would adding brown sugar be worth the try? Thanks for any advice!

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 01:29 AM   #2
Shawn Hargreaves
Recipes 
 
Jun 2008
Seattle
Posts: 344
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts


I don't see the point in using a lambic blend if you're going to drink this after just 4 weeks.

Lambic blend is a mix of regular ale yeast, plus lactobacillus, pediococcus, and brettanomyces. The ale yeast will finish primary fermentation within a couple of weeks, but these other organisms take many months before they will have any flavor effect at all. And once they do kick in a couple of months after the ale yeast is done, they will make the beer look and taste pretty nasty while they are working on it! It takes a long time for them to calm down again and leave something tasty behind.

So if you're going to drink after one month, I question what is the point of adding these bugs at all. You'll just be drinking regular ale, which will have a tiny amount of these other bugs in it but they won't have affected the flavor at all. It'll taste good, but you could get the same result more predictably by using a regular ale yeast.

I also think this recipe would make good beer using the lambic blend. But if you're going to use that, you should wait at least a year for it to do its stuff.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:11 AM   #3
Professor Frink
 
Professor Frink's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2006
San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,085
Liked 19 Times on 16 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Hargreaves View Post
I don't see the point in using a lambic blend if you're going to drink this after just 4 weeks.

Lambic blend is a mix of regular ale yeast, plus lactobacillus, pediococcus, and brettanomyces. The ale yeast will finish primary fermentation within a couple of weeks, but these other organisms take many months before they will have any flavor effect at all. And once they do kick in a couple of months after the ale yeast is done, they will make the beer look and taste pretty nasty while they are working on it! It takes a long time for them to calm down again and leave something tasty behind.

So if you're going to drink after one month, I question what is the point of adding these bugs at all. You'll just be drinking regular ale, which will have a tiny amount of these other bugs in it but they won't have affected the flavor at all. It'll taste good, but you could get the same result more predictably by using a regular ale yeast.

I also think this recipe would make good beer using the lambic blend. But if you're going to use that, you should wait at least a year for it to do its stuff.
Agreed, if you add the lambic blend and bottle it after 4 weeks, you're going to get 2 cases of bottle bombs. If you want a 4 week turnaround, I recommend doing a Cherry Wheat type beer.
__________________
Primary: Cherrywood Smoked Porter
60 Minute IPA
Secondary:
On tap:Amber Ale
Milk Stout

Lagering:


http://www.lazydogbrewery.com

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:14 AM   #4
BierMuncher
...My Junk is Ugly...
HBT_MODERATOR.png
 
BierMuncher's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2007
St. Louis, MO
Posts: 12,415
Liked 795 Times on 438 Posts


Way ...

But when I see the letters L A M B I C all strung together. My mouth kind of waters. And not in a good way.

The kind of way it does when I see a watermelon jolly rancher. Hate the things...but it's an involuntary reaction.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:30 AM   #5
TCJosh
Recipes 
 
Jan 2009
Posts: 62


That's great advice. I'm glad I checked. So If I use ale yeast, what about the fruit? Add to the secondary (as I've heard around here) or to the primary as suggested?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:31 AM   #6
Professor Frink
 
Professor Frink's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2006
San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,085
Liked 19 Times on 16 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by TCJosh View Post
That's great advice. I'm glad I checked. So If I use ale yeast, what about the fruit? Add to the secondary (as I've heard around here) or to the primary as suggested?
I would add it to the secondary.
__________________
Primary: Cherrywood Smoked Porter
60 Minute IPA
Secondary:
On tap:Amber Ale
Milk Stout

Lagering:


http://www.lazydogbrewery.com

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my first recipe, need opinions Gildog Recipes/Ingredients 2 04-29-2009 05:58 PM
Opinions on this recipe... PearlJamNoCode Recipes/Ingredients 5 04-01-2008 02:13 AM
opinions on recipe sconnie Mead Forum 18 09-25-2006 02:07 AM
Opinions on an ESB recipe, please Steve973 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 1 08-10-2006 04:53 PM
Opinions on an ESB recipe, please Steve973 Recipes/Ingredients 11 08-10-2006 04:49 PM


Forum Jump