Nah dude...Slayer more or less invented thrash metal. Anthrax had some decent songs, but greatest thrash band? Come on. Anal **** is better thrash than they are. Is it just me, or when you listen to Anthrax, do you think speed punk and/or early rap/rock? Decent band, great guys (met them once), but not good thrash. I'll give them the fact that they pretty much invented rap/rock, but
good thrash they are not.
Now they have TRIPLE guitar harmonies!
And? Smashing Pumpkins have been doing that, or quadruple, or quintuple harmonies since the late 80s, and they're not metal in the least bit. Triple guitar harmonies are that impressive? Listen to some Dragonforce.
One of their guitarists can put all of Maiden to shame.
She believes Hetfield is an excellent singer.
???? Sinatra is an "excellent" singer. Hetfield sounds like he had all of 0 seconds of training and eternally needs to take a giant dump. Zero range, and just generally not good. Not terrible, but not good at all.x Now, I haven't had any formal voice training, but hey, neither has oh, idk....99% of successful non-bubblegum-pop singers. If you want to talk about good "metal" singers, not considering sub-genre, you've got...the guy from Dragonforce, an ENORMOUS gap, the guy from Hammerfall, and then another enormous gap, then everyone else. Even if you don't like the way he sings, at least he can carry a tune, which is rare in metal, and he's got ridiculous range.
Slayer, color me stupid but I just don't get it.
I'm of the opinion that if you don't "get" Slayer, you don't "get" metal. That's the same kind of people that hate Slayer, but think screamo = awesome metal. LOL!
dave is cool and much better than james
Though I think both bands are s**t, agreed. I'd much, much rather listen to Megadeth than metallica, but hey...we're talking about metal, which metallica is not, unless overnight "soulless, meaningless, horrible "hard rock" that is trying to be something it isn't, played by entirely too old men" has evolved into a new genre of metal...but I don't think so
. Metallica always trys to make out like they're so hard. Please! Metallica would be hard enough worth noting in the early 70s at the latest.
A couple people have mentioned Disturbed..metal (but barely..more like "pop" metal), and I thought we were talking about GOOD metal. One of the points of metal is that it's not ever supposed to be in a position to where it ever even CAN be overplayed on the radio. When soccer moms like Disturbed, you know they are fail as metal. I'm not going to lie...I hate Metallica, but they're generally talented. Disturbed is godawful. I was that good at guitar in 7th grade.
What ever happened to Phil?
Heroin. Why do you think they broke up?