Hello!
I'm putting together a recipe based on this article:
http://www.brewingtechniques.com/library/backissues/issue5.3/urquell.html
It mentions a mash schedule like this:
Mash in at 95°F for acid rest at 1.85l/kg (0.89qt/lb)
Decoct to 127°F for protein rest
Decoct to 143°F for starch conversion
Decoct to 163°F for mash-out
I'll skip the acid rest and mash in directly for the protein rest making it a double decoction mash instead of a triple.
But my concern here is the extremely thick mash.. I'd be inclined to double the amount of water. Why would I want to keep the mash as thick as in the article?
I'm putting together a recipe based on this article:
http://www.brewingtechniques.com/library/backissues/issue5.3/urquell.html
It mentions a mash schedule like this:
Mash in at 95°F for acid rest at 1.85l/kg (0.89qt/lb)
Decoct to 127°F for protein rest
Decoct to 143°F for starch conversion
Decoct to 163°F for mash-out
I'll skip the acid rest and mash in directly for the protein rest making it a double decoction mash instead of a triple.
But my concern here is the extremely thick mash.. I'd be inclined to double the amount of water. Why would I want to keep the mash as thick as in the article?