Not only does Cargill produce high quality malt, but they import high quality malt from other world-class maltsters. Your opinion of their corporation or policies (which are COMPLETELY separate from the brewer's supply section) does not mean in any way, shape or form that they produce an inferior product. Look at probrewer.com, you will find glowing reviews of their products and customer service. In 23 years in the industry I have NEVER known a single brewer that chose a malt supplier solely based upon price, I seriously doubt that RR chose Cargill because they are cheaper. Frankly, have doing brewing logs and inventories and price breakdowns that would fill volumes, I can honestly say that malt prices and their differences are amongst the LEAST of a commercial brewery's cost concerns. The difference between pricing on domestic malt suppliers is measured in pennies. Suppliers are often chosen due to warehousing and distribution issues (i.e., who has the closest distribution and, hence, lowest delivered price).
I have not done business with them (Cargill), nor do I personally know anyone who works there. I DO know that you made blatantly false claims against them and RR (another company that I have no ties to) and you have yet to retract those statements. Cargill does not, as you claimed, produce GMO malt.. NO ONE DOES... and, therefore, the malt used by RR is also not GMO. You also claim Cargill malt is "junk"... Proof? As I said, lots of glowing reviews by people using it. Put up or shut up, as they say. If you want to be taken seriously, I suggest you apologize for slandering them both before you continue your campaign. Once you have done so, I would be more than happy to hear a well thought out argument against the quality of Cargill malts... that would, of course, have to include some sort of proof of claims.
