O.K. The "campy factor" turned me off. It makes me think of a show for kids, or a way to keep some people interested. I understand it's appeal and why it was done as such. I think it was a great show. In fact the only other show that was as good, but better in my opinion was "taste" hosted by David Rosengarten (this was the predecessor on food network, mid to late 90's). I liked his style, and the childishness was not present.
Either way the science of food was there. Way more beneficial to those who love food and the way it works than the other less than stellar shows. Consider me jaded though as I am a culinary graduate and on again and off again chef ( carpal tunnel is a *****!! ).
All that said, anything that gets people interested in food beyond the point that we need it to live is great in my book. Better food is like craft beer. It takes passion and care. As well as a desire for something better than "the norm". The pleasure of creating something for someone that garners "this is the best meal I have ever had" makes all of it worth it and more. It is a very gratifying feeling.